scholarly journals Superpixel Segmentation Based on Global Similarity and Contour Region Transform

2020 ◽  
Vol E103.D (3) ◽  
pp. 716-719
Author(s):  
Bing LUO ◽  
Junkai XIONG ◽  
Li XU ◽  
Zheng PEI
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Wang ◽  
Bernard De Baets

Superpixel segmentation can benefit from the use of an appropriate method to measure edge strength. In this paper, we present such a method based on the first derivative of anisotropic Gaussian kernels. The kernels can capture the position, direction, prominence, and scale of the edge to be detected. We incorporate the anisotropic edge strength into the distance measure between neighboring superpixels, thereby improving the performance of an existing graph-based superpixel segmentation method. Experimental results validate the superiority of our method in generating superpixels over the competing methods. It is also illustrated that the proposed superpixel segmentation method can facilitate subsequent saliency detection.


Author(s):  
Janith Bandara Senanayaka ◽  
Dilshan Thilanka Morawaliyadda ◽  
Shehan Tharuka Senarath ◽  
Roshan Indika Godaliyadda ◽  
Mervyn Parakrama Ekanayake

IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 4607-4615
Author(s):  
Tingzhao Yu ◽  
Qiuming Kuang ◽  
Junnan Hu ◽  
Jiangping Zheng ◽  
Xiaoyong Li

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 481-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian-Zhu Xiang ◽  
Gui-Song Xia ◽  
Xiang Bai ◽  
Liangpei Zhang

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Daniels ◽  
Gerry Johnson

In his critique of Daniels et al. (2002), Hodgkinson (2001a) raises a number of issues concerning the use and comparison of ideographic cognitive maps. Hodgkinson claims that there are problems associated with global similarity ratings, and that ideographic methods should be replaced by methods that have some nomothetic component. In reply, we show that the specific issues raised by Hodgkinson are not at all problematic in the context of the research questions addressed by Daniels et al. We examine Hodgkinson's proposed alternative and explain why it would not be appropriate for the questions addressed by Daniels et al. We then argue that Hodgkinson' s approach, far from being a panacea for problems in cognitive mapping research, will deflect from the issues of real debate in this area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document