scholarly journals Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP) - Part 5: Institutional outcomes assessment and the role of the Laboratory of Physiology

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Alberto de Souza Freitas ◽  
Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam ◽  
Daniela Gamba Garib ◽  
Lucimara Teixeira das Neves ◽  
Ana Lucia Pompeia Fraga de Almeida ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Alberto de Souza Freitas ◽  
Daniela Gamba Garib ◽  
Marchini Oliveira ◽  
Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho Lauris ◽  
Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Alberto de Souza Freitas ◽  
Lucimara Teixeira das Neves ◽  
Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida ◽  
Daniela Gamba Garib ◽  
Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam ◽  
...  

Dental Update ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 547-554
Author(s):  
Sharan Reddy ◽  
Catherine Liu ◽  
Mina Vaidyanathan ◽  
Nabina Bhujel

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is the most common of craniofacial anomalies in humans. CLP results from disruption of embryonic processes during orofacial development; while syndromic clefts may have clearer aetiology, non-syndromic clefts are heterogeneous in aetiology. It is important for GDPs to understand the classification of CLP and the structure of centralized cleft centres in order to communicate with cleft teams. This article aims to clarify the role of GDPs within cleft management and discusses challenges in maintaining oral health in this group of patients, including increased risk of dental caries and periodontal disease, dental anomalies and psychosocial considerations. CPD/Clinical Relevance: The GDP should be responsible for maintaining good oral health for the patient with cleft lip and palate, focusing on prevention from a young age and restorative work if needed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Alberto de Souza Freitas ◽  
Daniela Gamba Garib ◽  
Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam ◽  
Roberta Martinelli Carvalho ◽  
Thais Marchini Oliveira ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Alberto de Souza FREITAS ◽  
Ana Lucia Pompeia Fraga de ALMEIDA ◽  
Simone SOARES ◽  
Lucimara Teixeira das NEVES ◽  
Daniela Gamba GARIB ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Gamba Garib ◽  
Julia Petruccelli Rosar ◽  
Renata Sathler ◽  
Terumi Okada Ozawa

Introduction:Cleft lip and palate are craniofacial anomalies highly prevalent in the overall population. In oral clefts involving the alveolar ridge, variations of number, shape, size and position are observed in maxillary lateral incisors. The objective of this manuscript is to elucidate the embryonic origin of maxillary lateral incisors in order to understand the etiology of these variations.Contextualization: The hypothesis that orofacial clefts would split maxillary lateral incisor buds has been previously reported. However, recent studies showed that maxillary lateral incisors have dual embryonic origin, being partially formed by both the medial nasal process and the maxillary process. In other words, the mesial half of the lateral incisor seems to come from the medial nasal process while the distal half of the lateral incisor originates from the maxillary process. In cleft patients, these processes do not fuse, which results in different numerical and positional patterns for lateral incisors relating to the alveolar cleft. In addition to these considerations, this study proposes a nomenclature for maxillary lateral incisors in patients with cleft lip and palate, based on embryology and lateral incisors position in relation to the alveolar cleft.Conclusion:Embryological knowledge on the dual origin of maxillary lateral incisors and the use of a proper nomenclature for their numerical and positional variations renders appropriate communication among professionals and treatment planning easier, in addition to standardizing research analysis.


1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 436-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Anderson ◽  
Anthony L.H., Moss

The incidence of dental abnormalities in the cleft lip and palate population has been reported to be much higher than in the normal population. The role of genes in the production of a cleft lip and palate, and dental anomalies is thought to be complex, with autosomal dominant, recessive, and x-linked genes all playing a role. Noncleft parents can carry some of the cleft lip and palate genes, which produce clinically subtle manifestations in their facial skeleton. The purpose of this study was to look for evidence of increased dental anomalies in the non-cleft parents of cleft lip and palate children. The dentitions of the parents of 60 children with different types of cleft lip and palate were examined prospectively to see whether or not they exhibited features found more readily in the cleft lip and palate rather than did the normal population. Their dentitions were studied to record the following dental features: congenitally missing teeth, supernumerary teeth, or morphologic changes of the crowns of the permanent teeth. The number and position of any frenal attachments were also recorded. The results of this study did not show any differences in incidence of dental anomalies from the noncleft population. There was no evidence to support the hypothesis that congenital absence of lateral incisors is a microform of cleft lip and palate. Further, these results also failed to reveal any consistent pattern in the number and position of frenal attachments.


Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (21) ◽  
pp. e26101
Author(s):  
Yangyang Lin ◽  
Tao Song ◽  
Elsa M. Ronde ◽  
Gang Ma ◽  
Huiqin Cui ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document