scholarly journals Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer

Author(s):  
Paulo Moacir de Oliveira Campoli ◽  
Flávio Hayato Ejima ◽  
Daniela Medeiros Milhomem Cardoso ◽  
Paulo Adriano de Queiroz Barreto ◽  
Rafael de Deus Pires ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed as proposed by Gauderer et al. in 1980, has been used quite frequently in patients with head and neck tumors. Some authors believe that this so-called pull technique would be associated to the risk of a tumor implantation in the wound as well as high levels of peristomal wound infection. Although some alternative techniques provide better results, doubts about their technical applicability in daily practice still persists. AIM: To assess the feasibility, safety and morbidity of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed through a well-defined and standardized technique in patients with nonresectable or advanced head and neck cancer. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who had either nonresectable or advanced tumors and were unable to be fed orally were submitted to an oncologic-hospital-based tertiary-referral endoscopy practice. Tubes were implanted through an introducer technique comprised of two main stages. The first consisted of the application of two stitches aiming to fixate the anterior gastric wall to the abdominal wall, and the second being the inserting of the gastrostomy tube. RESULTS: Between February 2003 and May 2004, 129 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies were performed. This study included 60 patients. They were all able to receive food on the same day. Operative morbidity was observed in six patients (10%) and one procedure-related mortality was also observed (1.6%). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is both feasible and safe, associated to low morbidity, and to acceptable mortality rates.

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna P. Y. Kwong ◽  
Edith J. Stokes ◽  
Elaine C. Posluns ◽  
Margaret I. Fitch ◽  
Alison McAndrew ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. v54
Author(s):  
Tomoya Yokota ◽  
Tsuyoshi Onoe ◽  
Hirofumi Ogawa ◽  
Satoshi Hamauchi ◽  
Tomomi Hikosaka ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (07) ◽  
pp. E630-E634
Author(s):  
Louise Di Palma ◽  
Gustavo Mello ◽  
Cindy Granados ◽  
Ricardo Glória ◽  
Caroline Dalbem ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Performing a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients can be challenging because of the presence of trismus, pharyngeal obstruction by tumor, and pharyngoesophageal strictures or fistula. Pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is a major postoperative concern in patients submitted to total laryngectomy (TL). In the medical literature to date, the cervical fistula has been used as an access to PEG in only four reports. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of cervical fistula for insertion of a PEG tube. Patients and methods Retrospective study at a single tertiary referral center, regarding the technical feasibility, safety and outcomes of a PEG tube introduced by a cervical fistula in HNC patients with obstructive lesions of the oropharynx. Results The procedure was technically successful in all 21 patients. A PEG tube was used for a minimum of 1 month and a maximum of 120 months. Twelve patients died while using the PEG tube, 8 had it taken out because it was no longer needed, and only 1 had the tube still in use. Adverse events occurred in 8 patients: granuloma (19 %), dermatitis (9.5 %), accidental late removal of the tube (9.5 %), periprocedural gastric wall hematoma (9.5 %), peristomal wound infection (4.7 %), buried bumper syndrome (4.7 %), and traumatic gastric ulcer (4.7 %). Conclusion A postoperative cervical fistula can successfully work as a reliable and safe access for a PEG tube procedure in HNC patients, avoiding unnecessary surgery and reducing costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document