scholarly journals Correlation of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [TI-RADS] and fine needle aspiration: experience in 1,000 nodules

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Rahal Junior ◽  
Priscila Mina Falsarella ◽  
Rafael Dahmer Rocha ◽  
João Paulo Bacellar Costa Lima ◽  
Matheus Jorge Iani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Data System ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Bethesda Classification ◽  
The Bethesda System

ABSTRACT Objective To correlate the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the Bethesda system in reporting cytopathology in 1,000 thyroid nodules. Methods A retrospective study conducted from November 2011 to February 2014 that evaluated 1,000 thyroid nodules of 906 patients who underwent ultrasound exam and fine needle aspiration. Results A significant association was found between the TI-RADS outcome and Bethesda classification (p<0.001). Most individuals with TI-RADS 2 or 3 had Bethesda 2 result (95.5% and 92.5%, respectively). Among those classified as TI-RADS 4C and 5, most presented Bethesda 6 (68.2% and 91.3%, respectively; p<0.001). The proportion of malignancies among TI-RADS 2 was 0.8%, and TI-RADS 3 was 1.7%. Among those classified as TI-RADS 4A, proportion of malignancies was 16.0%, 43.2% in 4B, 72.7% in 4C and 91.3% among TI-RADS 5 (p<0.001), showing clear association between TI-RADS and biopsy results. Conclusion The TI-RADS is appropriate to assess thyroid nodules and avoid unnecessary fine needle aspiration, as well as to assist in making decision about when this procedure should be performed.

scholarly journals Comparison of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Thyroid Lesions using The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology with Ultrasonography using Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudeep Regmi ◽  
Archana Tiwari ◽  
Rupesh Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Data System ◽  
Substantial Agreement ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Lesions

Introduction: Thyroid nodule is a common presentation. The estimated prevalence of thyroid nodules is 4-7% by clinical examination and 50-60% on ultrasonographic (USG) evaluation. Most are benign without any symptoms or cosmetic concerns. Only around 5% are found to be malignant. Methods: This prospective study evaluated a total of 54 patients with thyroid lesions presenting to Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery and Internal Medicine out-patient departments of a tertiary hospital for a period of nine months. The thyroid lesions were categorized into different categories using Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) by USG and The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) by fine needle aspiration (FNA). The agreement between TIRADS and TBSRTC was evaluated using Cohen's kappa statistics. Results: By FNA, 68.5% were benign lesions whereas 7.4% were malignant. Follicular Neoplasm (FN) or Suspicious for FN and Suspicious for Malignancy category comprised 5.6% each. 1.9% of the lesions showed Atypia of Unknown Significance (AUS). 11.1% of the lesions were non-diagnostic or unsatisfactory for evaluation. Overall agreement between the cases by USG and FNA using the TIRADS and TBSRTC respectively was 77.77%. There was a substantial agreement between the diagnosis made by these systems, kappa (κ)= .633 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.85, p<0.05). Conclusion: This study observed a substantial agreement between the diagnosis made by TIRADS on USG and TBSRTC on FNA. Our study advocates the stratification of thyroid lesions according to TIRADS so that only suspicious lesions undergo FNA.

scholarly journals Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) for Fine Needle Aspiration of Thyroid: Is It Helpful?

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ahmed K. Aly ◽  
Mahmoud A. Ali ◽  
Apoorva Sharma ◽  
Michael A. Gubbels ◽  
Xing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Site Evaluation ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Introduction: Thyroid nodules are very common. Many are detected incidentally due to increased head and neck imaging. The majority are benign; however, malignancy can’t be excluded in many cases and tissue sampling is needed. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration is an easy and effective way to sample g thyroid nodules. Inadequate sampling was reported in 10-40% of the cases. Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) was proposed to assess obtained sample for adequacy. The aim of this study is to identify the benefit of applying ROSE with US-FNA of thyroid nodules within our institution. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent FNA for thyroid nodules with ROSE availability documented in their procedure note between January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively included. All procedures were done by experienced radiologists. Aspirated material was Diff Quik stained for immediate evaluation. The final cytological diagnosis and specimen adequacy was based on The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Specimen adequacy was compared between ROSE and non-ROSE groups. Results: 442 thyroid nodules were biopsied. ROSE was available for 65 nodules. Non-diagnostic rate with ROSE was 10.8% compared to 13.8% without ROSE with the difference being statistically insignificant. ROSE availability improved sample adequacy of nodules less than 3 cm with statistically significant difference of 100.0% with ROSE vs. 87% without ROSE. Conclusion: The current study does not justify the routine use of ROSE. However, ROSE availability is beneficial with smaller sized thyroid nodules and less experienced radiologists performing the procedure. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2021-0301-1 Full Text: PDF

GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION ON FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION FOR THYROID NODULES: FOCUSING ON MICRONODULES

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1017-1025
Author(s):  
Si Eun Lee ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
Hee Jung Moon ◽  
Jung Hyun Yoon ◽  
Vivian Youngjean Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodule ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Data System ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Thyroid Imaging

Objective: We investigated patients who were referred to our institution after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at outside clinics to evaluate how many nodules satisfied the FNA indications of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and compare that to the number of thyroid nodules that satisfy the FNA indications of the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 2,628 patients were included in our study. The included patients were those referred for thyroid surgery after having a suspicious thyroid nodule. We retrospectively applied the three guidelines to each thyroid nodule and determined whether each nodule satisfied the FNA indications. We compared the proportion of nodules satisfying the FNA indications of each guideline using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equation. Results: The median size of the 2,628 thyroid nodules was 0.9 cm (range, 0.2 to 9.5 cm). We found that FNA was not indicated for 54.1%, 47.7%, and 19.1% of nodules and 87.3%, 99.0%, and 97.8% among them were micronodules (<1 cm) according to the ACR-TIRADS, ATA guideline, and K-TIRADS, respectively. The proportion of micronodules which satisfied the FNA indications was significantly higher for the K-TIRADS (65.1%) compared to the ACR TIRADS (12.1%) and ATA guideline (12.1%) ( P<.001). Conclusion: Among patients referred for thyroid surgery to our institutions, about 35% of the micronodules underwent FNA despite not being appropriate for indications by the K-TIRADS. Systematic training for physicians as well as modifications to increase the sensitivity of the guideline may be needed to reduce the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancers, especially for micronodules. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; K-TIRADS = Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; LN = lymph node; TIRADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; US = ultrasound

scholarly journals Fine Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules Using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: An Institutional Experience in a Rural Setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aili Guo ◽  
Yuuki Kaminoh ◽  
Terra Forward ◽  
Frank L. Schwartz ◽  
Scott Jenkinson
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Rural Setting ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Fna ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Background. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) remains the first-line diagnostic in management of thyroid nodules and reduces unnecessary surgeries. However, it is still challenging since cytological results are not always straightforward. This study aimed to examine the results of thyroid FNA using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) to establish the level of accuracy of FNA procedures in a rural practice setting. Method. A retrospective chart review was conducted on existing thyroid FNA performed in a referral endocrine center between December 2011 and November 2015. Results. A total of 159 patients (18–88 years old) and 236 nodule aspirations were performed and submitted for evaluation. 79% were benign, 3% atypia/follicular lesion of unknown significance (AUS/FLUS), 5% follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN), 4% suspicious for malignancy (one case was indeed an atypical parathyroid neoplasm by surgical pathology), 2% malignant, and 7% nondiagnostic. Two cases also had advanced molecular analysis on FNA specimens before thyroidectomy. Conclusion. The diagnostic yield of FNA cytology from our practice in a rural setting suggests that accuracy and specificity are comparable to results from larger centers.

scholarly journals O31: CORRELATION BETWEEN THYROID FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY (FNAC) SCORES AND CANCER INCIDENCE ON FINAL HISTOPATHOLOGY – A MULTI-CENTRE RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Iwegbulem ◽  
Z Razzaq ◽  
F Crowley ◽  
M Majeed ◽  
D Cagney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Abstract Introduction Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is the best diagnostic tool for evaluating thyroid nodules pre-operatively. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cyto-pathology (TBSRTC) in America and THY classification in Europe are standardized reporting systems for thyroid FNAC specimens using six categories. As compared to the first edition in 2009, a second edition of TBSRTC published in 2017 has revised risk of malignancy (ROM) for these categories, with focus on atypia of unknown significance (Thy3A) upgraded to 10-30% from previously 5-15%, and suspicion for follicular neoplasm (Thy3F) 25-40% from previous 15-30%. Method A three-year audit of thyroid surgeries performed in two high volume thyroid institutions from January 2016 to September 2019, was performed retrospectively. The FNAs were performed by thyroid specialist radiologists with a cytopathology technician in attendance for rapid on-site evaluation and reported as per TBSRTC and Thy classification, by a Consultant Cyto-pathologist from a single institution. Result A total of 702 patients were examined. There were 552 patients who had corresponding FNAC prior to surgery (mean age 53.6 years, females 79%). The rates of malignancy were, Thy1: 9.3%, Thy2: 4.6%, Thy3A: 10.8%, Thy3F: 28.7%, Thy4: 82.3% and Thy5: 100%. The main types of thyroid malignancy were Papillary (73.6%), Follicular (14.1%), Medullary (4%), Anaplastic (4.7%) and others (3.6%). Conclusion Pre-operative diagnosis of thyroid nodules using TBSRTC was comparable and the criteria helped avoid misinterpretation of results. Our results were comparable with the risk of malignancy in 2009 edition of TBSRTC, as compared to the 2017 revision. Take-home message Pre-operative diagnosis of thyroid nodules using The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cyto-pathology (TBSRTC) was comparable and the criteria helped avoid misinterpretation of results. Our results were comparable with the risk of malignancy in 2009 edition of TBSRTC, as compared to the 2017 revision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document