scholarly journals CHANGES IN RADIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiliano Vialle ◽  
David Schleifer ◽  
Abel Carneiro ◽  
Orlando Colina ◽  
Luiz Roberto Vialle
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterolateral Approach ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Interbody Cage ◽  
Segmental Lordosis ◽  
Radiographic Improvement

Objective : This study aims to evaluate changes in lumbosacral parameters after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether interbody cage shape (crescent shaped or rectangular) would influence the results. Method : Retrospective analysis of 70 patients who underwent one or two level lumbar interbody fusion through a minimally invasive posterolateral approach. This included midline preservation and unilateral facetectomy. Pre- and postoperative (three to six months postoperative) radiographs were used for measuring lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL) at the level of interbody fusion, and sacral slope (SS). Further analyses divided the patients into Roussouly lumbar subgroups. Results : LL was significantly reduced after surgery (59o:39o, p=0.001) as well as the SS (33.8o:31.2o, p=0.05). SL did not change significantly (11.4:11.06, p=0.85). There were no significant differences when comparing patients who received crescent shaped cage (n=27) and rectangular cage (n=43). Hypolordotic patients (Roussouly types 1 and 2) had radiographic improvement in comparison to normolordotic and hyperlordotic groups (types 3 and 4). Conclusion : Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion caused reduction in lumbosacral parameters. Cage shape had no influence on the results.

scholarly journals RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF ANTERIOR INTERNODY ARTHRODESIS ON THE SAGITTAL LUMBOPELVIC PARAMETERS

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-107
Author(s):  
FELIPE DE NEGREIROS NANNI ◽  
EMILIANO NEVES VIALLE ◽  
MARVIN DURANTE BRUNET
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pelvic Parameters ◽  
Segmental Lordosis

ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study is to analyze the radiographs of patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), to compare the values of the lumbopelvic measurements, and to quantify improvements in these parameters achieved through this technique. Methods The radiographs of 42 patients, all submitted to ALIF with a 12° interbody device, were evaluated from a database at a single center. The pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, and regional lordosis angles of each patient were measured in pre- and postoperative radiographs. Results We observed a discreet change in the pelvic parameters and a marked increase in regional lordosis with a mean increase of 5.8° (p>0.001). Segmental lordosis also showed a mean increase of 2.43°. The gain in segmental lordosis was even higher in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and when the operated level was L5-S1. Conclusions The ALIF technique in the lumbar spine is capable of significantly increase the lordosis of a segment, whether at one or two levels. Greater improvement in the lumbopelvic parameters was observed it the procedures performed in level L5-S1 and in cases that presented spondylolisthesis.

Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph H McMordie ◽  
Kyle P Schmidt ◽  
Andrew P Gard ◽  
Christopher C Gillis
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Radiographic Measurements

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. However, its ability to restore lumbar lordosis has been limited. Development of expandable lordotic interbody devices has challenged this limitation, furthering the scope of minimally invasive surgery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the radiographic and clinical effects of expandable lordotic interbody devices placed through an MIS-TLIF approach. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 32 1-level and 18 2-level MIS-TLIFs performed using lordotic expandable interbody devices. Lumbar radiographic measurements, Oswestry Disability Index scores (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale scores (VAS) were obtained at preoperative, 6 wk follow up, and last follow up time points. Last follow up occurred at a mean of 11.5 ± 7.6 mo (mean ± SD). RESULTS At 6-wk follow-up, segmental lordosis, disc height, and foraminal height increased by an average of 3.4°, 6.4 mm, and 4.4 mm, respectively. Only the 2-level group showed a significant increase in lumbar lordosis of 5.8°. No significant changes occurred in sacral slope, pelvic tilt, or pelvic incidence. Average ODI and VAS decreased by −12.0 and −4.5, respectively. Postoperative lumbar lordosis inversely correlated with preoperative lordosis in patients with an initial Pelvic Incidence to Lumbar Lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) of >10°, (r = −0.5, P = .009). CONCLUSION When applied across 2-levels, MIS-TLIF using expandable lordotic interbody devices produced a significant increase in lumbar lordosis. Preoperative lumbar lordosis was found to be a predictor of postoperative lumbar lordotic change in patients with sagittal imbalance.

Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 951-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon B. Carlson ◽  
Philip Saville ◽  
James Dowdell ◽  
Rie Goto ◽  
Avani Vaishnav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Feasibility of Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion through the Posterior Paraspinal Approach: Technical Note and Preliminary Result

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeun-Sung Kim ◽  
Harshavardhan Dilip Raorane ◽  
Pang Hung Wu ◽  
Dong Hwa Heo ◽  
Yeon Jin Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Plain Radiograph ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Paraspinal Approach ◽  
Segmental Lordosis

Abstract Background: The implement of endoscopic spinal surgery into degenerative spinal disease has minimized the requirement of fusion procedures. However, it is still necessary to develop endoscopic spine surgery in certain patients requiring fusion such as instability. We performed a full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(eTLIF) through a conventional paraspinal approach. The feasibility of procedure and early outcome were evaluated.Materials and Methods: eighteen consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar disease underwent eTLIF through a conventional paraspinal approach. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated with visual analog scale(VAS) leg pain score, Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) and the MacNab's criteria; radiological outcome measured with segmental lordosis, global lumbar lordosis, disc height on plain radiograph and percentage of potential fusion mass on CT scan at pre-operative, post-operative and final follow up period. intra operative and post-operative complications noted.Results: Mean age was 63. 71 years and Mean follow-up periods was 7.78 months. According to the level, L2-3 (1 case), L3-4 (4 cases), L4-5 (13 cases) and L5-S1 (2 cases). In the X-ray result, mean segmental lordosis angle(SLA) improved in pre-operative/post-operative/follow-up period 9.87±2.74 degree/ 11.79±3.74 degree/ 10.56±3.69 degree (p > 0.01); mean lumbar lordosis angle(LLA) improved 37.1±7.04 degree/ 39.2±7.13 degree/ 35.7±7.25 degree(p > 0.01). Mean preoperative disc height(DH) improved from 8.97±1.49 mm/ 12.34±1.39 mm/ 11.44±1.98 mm (p < 0.01). In the CT result, Average percentage of fusion mass was 42.61%. VAS was improved significantly, 7.67 / 3.39 / 2.5 and ODI was improved significantly, 74.9 / 34.56 / 27.76 by each preoperative / postoperative / final follow-up. In the clinical result, excellent was 5 cases and good was 13 cases. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, eTLIF was competent enough to perform as open TLIF. and good results were obtained in the form of endplate preservation, disc height restoration, minimal blood loss and post-operative pain with early mobilization. In addition, the fusion volume including the cage and the bone graft material occupies 40% to 50% of disc space is expected to give sufficient fusion by using 3D printed cages which gives the high fusion rate. In conclusion, eTLIF is considered to be a viable surgical procedure.

Radiographic comparison of lordotic and hyperlordotic implants in L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
S. Harrison Farber ◽  
Soumya Sagar ◽  
Jakub Godzik ◽  
James J. Zhou ◽  
Corey T. Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Upright Standing ◽  
Segmental Lordosis ◽  
Level Fusion

OBJECTIVE Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) used at the lumbosacral junction provides arthrodesis for several indications. The anterior approach allows restoration of lumbar lordosis, an important goal of surgery. With hyperlordotic ALIF implants, several options may be employed to obtain the desired amount of lordosis. In this study, the authors compared the degree of radiographic lordosis achieved with lordotic and hyperlordotic ALIF implants at the L5–S1 segment. METHODS All patients undergoing L5–S1 ALIF from 2 institutions over a 4-year interval were included. Patients < 18 years of age or those with any posterior decompression or osteotomy were excluded. ALIF implants in the lordotic group had 8° or 12° of inherent lordosis, whereas implants in the hyperlordotic group had 20° or 30° of lordosis. Upright standing radiographs were used to determine all radiographic parameters, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc space lordosis, and disc space height. Separate analyses were performed for patients who underwent single-segment fixation at L5–S1 and for the overall cohort. RESULTS A total of 204 patients were included (hyperlordotic group, 93 [45.6%]; lordotic group, 111 [54.4%]). Single-segment ALIF at L5–S1 was performed in 74 patients (hyperlordotic group, 27 [36.5%]; lordotic group, 47 [63.5%]). The overall mean ± SD age was 61.9 ± 12.3 years; 58.3% of patients (n = 119) were women. The mean number of total segments fused was 3.2 ± 2.6. Overall, 66.7% (n = 136) of patients had supine surgery and 33.3% (n = 68) had lateral surgery. Supine positioning was significantly more common in the hyperlordotic group than in the lordotic group (83.9% [78/93] vs 52.3% [58/111], p < 0.001). After adjusting for differences in surgical positioning, the change in lumbar lordosis was significantly greater for hyperlordotic versus lordotic implants (3.6° ± 7.5° vs 0.4° ± 7.5°, p = 0.048) in patients with single-level fusion. For patients receiving hyperlordotic versus lordotic implants, changes were also significantly greater for segmental lordosis (12.4° ± 7.5° vs 8.4° ± 4.9°, p = 0.03) and disc space lordosis (15.3° ± 5.4° vs 9.3° ± 5.8°, p < 0.001) after single-level fusion at L5–S1. The change in disc space height was similar for these 2 groups (p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS Hyperlordotic implants provided a greater degree of overall lumbar lordosis restoration as well as L5–S1 segmental and disc space lordosis restoration than lordotic implants. The change in disc space height was similar. Differences in lateral and supine positioning did not affect these parameters.

scholarly journals Effects of Lordotic Angle of a Cage on Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcome in One Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Ho Lee ◽  
Dong-Oh Lee ◽  
Jae Hyup Lee ◽  
Hee Jong Shim
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Segmental Lordosis

This study aims to assess the differences in the radiological and clinical results depending on the lordotic angles of the cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). We reviewed 185 segments which underwent PLIF using two different lordotic angles of 4° and 8° of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. The segmental lordosis and total lumbar lordosis of the 4° and 8° cage groups were compared preoperatively, as well as on the first postoperative day, 6th and 12th months postoperatively. Clinical assessment was performed using the ODI and the VAS of low back pain. The pre- and immediate postoperative segmental lordosis angles were 12.9° and 12.6° in the 4° group and 12° and 12.0° in the 8° group. Both groups exhibited no significant different segmental lordosis angle and total lumbar lordosis over period and time. However, the total lumbar lordosis significantly increased from six months postoperatively compared with the immediate postoperative day in the 8° group. The ODI and the VAS in both groups had no differences. Cages with different lordotic angles of 4° and 8° showed insignificant results clinically and radiologically in short-level PLIF surgery. Clinical improvements and sagittal alignment recovery were significantly observed in both groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document