RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF ANTERIOR INTERNODY ARTHRODESIS ON THE SAGITTAL LUMBOPELVIC PARAMETERS

ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study is to analyze the radiographs of patients who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), to compare the values of the lumbopelvic measurements, and to quantify improvements in these parameters achieved through this technique. Methods The radiographs of 42 patients, all submitted to ALIF with a 12° interbody device, were evaluated from a database at a single center. The pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, and regional lordosis angles of each patient were measured in pre- and postoperative radiographs. Results We observed a discreet change in the pelvic parameters and a marked increase in regional lordosis with a mean increase of 5.8° (p>0.001). Segmental lordosis also showed a mean increase of 2.43°. The gain in segmental lordosis was even higher in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and when the operated level was L5-S1. Conclusions The ALIF technique in the lumbar spine is capable of significantly increase the lordosis of a segment, whether at one or two levels. Greater improvement in the lumbopelvic parameters was observed it the procedures performed in level L5-S1 and in cases that presented spondylolisthesis.

Download Full-text

Radiographic comparison of lordotic and hyperlordotic implants in L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2021.7.spine202221 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

S. Harrison Farber ◽

Soumya Sagar ◽

Jakub Godzik ◽

James J. Zhou ◽

Corey T. Walker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Disc Space ◽

Single Level ◽

Single Segment ◽

Upright Standing ◽

Segmental Lordosis ◽

Level Fusion

OBJECTIVE Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) used at the lumbosacral junction provides arthrodesis for several indications. The anterior approach allows restoration of lumbar lordosis, an important goal of surgery. With hyperlordotic ALIF implants, several options may be employed to obtain the desired amount of lordosis. In this study, the authors compared the degree of radiographic lordosis achieved with lordotic and hyperlordotic ALIF implants at the L5–S1 segment. METHODS All patients undergoing L5–S1 ALIF from 2 institutions over a 4-year interval were included. Patients < 18 years of age or those with any posterior decompression or osteotomy were excluded. ALIF implants in the lordotic group had 8° or 12° of inherent lordosis, whereas implants in the hyperlordotic group had 20° or 30° of lordosis. Upright standing radiographs were used to determine all radiographic parameters, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc space lordosis, and disc space height. Separate analyses were performed for patients who underwent single-segment fixation at L5–S1 and for the overall cohort. RESULTS A total of 204 patients were included (hyperlordotic group, 93 [45.6%]; lordotic group, 111 [54.4%]). Single-segment ALIF at L5–S1 was performed in 74 patients (hyperlordotic group, 27 [36.5%]; lordotic group, 47 [63.5%]). The overall mean ± SD age was 61.9 ± 12.3 years; 58.3% of patients (n = 119) were women. The mean number of total segments fused was 3.2 ± 2.6. Overall, 66.7% (n = 136) of patients had supine surgery and 33.3% (n = 68) had lateral surgery. Supine positioning was significantly more common in the hyperlordotic group than in the lordotic group (83.9% [78/93] vs 52.3% [58/111], p < 0.001). After adjusting for differences in surgical positioning, the change in lumbar lordosis was significantly greater for hyperlordotic versus lordotic implants (3.6° ± 7.5° vs 0.4° ± 7.5°, p = 0.048) in patients with single-level fusion. For patients receiving hyperlordotic versus lordotic implants, changes were also significantly greater for segmental lordosis (12.4° ± 7.5° vs 8.4° ± 4.9°, p = 0.03) and disc space lordosis (15.3° ± 5.4° vs 9.3° ± 5.8°, p < 0.001) after single-level fusion at L5–S1. The change in disc space height was similar for these 2 groups (p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS Hyperlordotic implants provided a greater degree of overall lumbar lordosis restoration as well as L5–S1 segmental and disc space lordosis restoration than lordotic implants. The change in disc space height was similar. Differences in lateral and supine positioning did not affect these parameters.

Download Full-text

Comparing Radiographic Parameters for Single-Level L5-S1 Interbody Fusion: Anterior Lumbar (ALIF) Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyz310_823 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Caleb S Edwards ◽

Andrew Kai-Hong Chan ◽

Dean Chou ◽

Praveen V Mummaneni

Keyword(s):

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Pelvic Incidence ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Central Canal ◽

Disc Height ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Single Level ◽

Segmental Lordosis

Abstract INTRODUCTION The lumbosacral junction acts as a transition point between the mobile lumbar spine and the rigid pelvis. It is thereby susceptible to degenerative changes necessitating fusion at L5-S1. In this study, we compared radiographic outcomes observed from single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at this level. METHODS Retrospective review of single-level ALIF and TLIF with up to one level PSF at L5-S1 between May 2007 and October 2018 was undertaken. X-ray measurements were gathered for lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, anterior/posterior disc height, and sagittal vertical axis. Computed tomography /magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine central canal area, sagittal diameter, foraminal height, and foraminal area. RESULTS A total of 47 ALIF patients and 50 TLIF patients were included. Patients averaged 53.7 ± 10.1 yr of age for ALIF and 49.4 ± 14.7 yr old for TLIF (P = .094) with significant differences (P = .0017) seen with gender as ALIF had 60.4% males and TLIF 70.0% females. Single-level ALIF led to significantly (P = .0010) more segmental lordosis (+5.75° ± 7.31°) than TLIF (+0.25° ± 6.55°), though differences in lumbar lordosis were not statistically significant (P = .52). ALIF significantly increased both anterior (+10.4 ± 4.32 mm vs +4.30 ± 3.55 mm; P < .0001) and posterior disc height (+4.33 ± 3.32 mm vs + 2.98 ± 2.07 mm; P = .043) than TLIF. Changes in sagittal vertical axis also significantly differed (P = .030) with ALIF decreasing sagittal vertical axis by 17.8 ± 26.4 mm from +60.3 mm to + 42.5 mm, and TLIF increasing by 0.95 ± 25.8 mm from 39.9 mm to 40.9 mm. Pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch had no significant differences. No statistically significant differences were observed with central canal area, sagittal diameter, foraminal height or foraminal area between ALIF and TLIF. CONCLUSION At L5-S1, the ALIF approach leads to increased segmental lordosis, disc height, while also decreasing sagittal vertical axis to a significant degree than TLIF. However, these two approaches were no different with regards to pelvic parameters and measures of central canal and foraminal decompression.

Download Full-text

CHANGES IN RADIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION

Coluna/Columna ◽

10.1590/s1808-185120151404152744 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 14 (4) ◽

pp. 265-267 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Emiliano Vialle ◽

David Schleifer ◽

Abel Carneiro ◽

Orlando Colina ◽

Luiz Roberto Vialle

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Retrospective Analysis ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Posterolateral Approach ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Interbody Cage ◽

Segmental Lordosis ◽

Radiographic Improvement

Objective : This study aims to evaluate changes in lumbosacral parameters after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether interbody cage shape (crescent shaped or rectangular) would influence the results. Method : Retrospective analysis of 70 patients who underwent one or two level lumbar interbody fusion through a minimally invasive posterolateral approach. This included midline preservation and unilateral facetectomy. Pre- and postoperative (three to six months postoperative) radiographs were used for measuring lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL) at the level of interbody fusion, and sacral slope (SS). Further analyses divided the patients into Roussouly lumbar subgroups. Results : LL was significantly reduced after surgery (59o:39o, p=0.001) as well as the SS (33.8o:31.2o, p=0.05). SL did not change significantly (11.4:11.06, p=0.85). There were no significant differences when comparing patients who received crescent shaped cage (n=27) and rectangular cage (n=43). Hypolordotic patients (Roussouly types 1 and 2) had radiographic improvement in comparison to normolordotic and hyperlordotic groups (types 3 and 4). Conclusion : Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion caused reduction in lumbosacral parameters. Cage shape had no influence on the results.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices

Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/neuros/nyz402 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Joseph H McMordie ◽

Kyle P Schmidt ◽

Andrew P Gard ◽

Christopher C Gillis

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Pelvic Incidence ◽

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Clinical Effects ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Radiographic Measurements

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. However, its ability to restore lumbar lordosis has been limited. Development of expandable lordotic interbody devices has challenged this limitation, furthering the scope of minimally invasive surgery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the radiographic and clinical effects of expandable lordotic interbody devices placed through an MIS-TLIF approach. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 32 1-level and 18 2-level MIS-TLIFs performed using lordotic expandable interbody devices. Lumbar radiographic measurements, Oswestry Disability Index scores (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale scores (VAS) were obtained at preoperative, 6 wk follow up, and last follow up time points. Last follow up occurred at a mean of 11.5 ± 7.6 mo (mean ± SD). RESULTS At 6-wk follow-up, segmental lordosis, disc height, and foraminal height increased by an average of 3.4°, 6.4 mm, and 4.4 mm, respectively. Only the 2-level group showed a significant increase in lumbar lordosis of 5.8°. No significant changes occurred in sacral slope, pelvic tilt, or pelvic incidence. Average ODI and VAS decreased by −12.0 and −4.5, respectively. Postoperative lumbar lordosis inversely correlated with preoperative lordosis in patients with an initial Pelvic Incidence to Lumbar Lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) of >10°, (r = −0.5, P = .009). CONCLUSION When applied across 2-levels, MIS-TLIF using expandable lordotic interbody devices produced a significant increase in lumbar lordosis. Preoperative lumbar lordosis was found to be a predictor of postoperative lumbar lordotic change in patients with sagittal imbalance.

Download Full-text

Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/2017.8.focus17423 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 43 (6) ◽

pp. E6 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Pooria Hosseini ◽

Gregory M. Mundis ◽

Robert K. Eastlack ◽

Ramin Bagheri ◽

Enrique Vargas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Pelvic Incidence ◽

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis ◽

Common Complication ◽

Sagittal Malalignment ◽

Junctional Kyphosis

OBJECTIVESagittal malalignment decreases patients’ quality of life and may require surgical correction to achieve realignment goals. High-risk posterior-based osteotomy techniques are the current standard treatment for addressing sagittal malalignment. More recently, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment (ALIF ACR) has been introduced as an alternative for correction of sagittal deformity. The objective of this paper was to report clinical and radiographic results for patients treated using the ALIF-ACR technique.METHODSA retrospective study of 39 patients treated with ALIF ACR was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, radiographic parameters, neurological assessments, outcome measures, and preoperative, postoperative, and mean 1-year follow-up complications were studied.RESULTSThe patient population comprised 39 patients (27 females and 12 males) with a mean follow-up of 13.3 ± 4.7 months, mean age of 66.1 ± 11.6 years, and mean body mass index of 27.3 ± 6.2 kg/m2. The mean number of ALIF levels treated was 1.5 ± 0.5. Thirty-three (84.6%) of 39 patients underwent posterior spinal fixation and 33 (84.6%) of 39 underwent posterior column osteotomy, of which 20 (60.6%) of 33 procedures were performed at the level of the ALIF ACR. Pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence were not statistically significantly different between the preoperative and postoperative periods and between the preoperative and 1-year follow-up periods (except for PT between the preoperative and 1-year follow-up, p = 0.018). Sagittal vertical axis, T-1 spinopelvic inclination, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch, intradiscal angle, and motion segment angle all improved from the preoperative to postoperative period and the preoperative to 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05). The changes in motion segment angle and intradiscal angle achieved in the ALIF-ACR group without osteotomy compared with the ALIF-ACR group with osteotomy at the level of ACR were not statistically significant. Total visual analog score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Scoliosis Research Society–22 scores all improved from preoperative to postoperative and preoperative to 1-year follow-up. Fourteen patients (35.9%) experienced 26 complications (15 major and 11 minor). Eleven patients required reoperation. The most common complication was proximal junctional kyphosis (6/26 complications, 23%) followed by vertebral body/endplate fracture (3/26, 12%).CONCLUSIONSThis study showed satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes at the 1-year follow-up. Proximal junctional kyphosis was the most common complication followed by fracture, complications that are commonly associated with sagittal realignment surgery and may not be mitigated by the anterior approach.

Download Full-text

The impact of increasing interbody fusion levels at the fractional curve on lordosis, curve correction, and complications in adult patients with scoliosis

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2020.6.spine20256 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-10

Author(s):

Dominic Amara ◽

Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽

Shane Burch ◽

Vedat Deviren ◽

Christopher P. Ames ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Pelvic Incidence ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Curve Correction ◽

Surgery Rates

OBJECTIVERadiculopathy from the fractional curve, usually from L3 to S1, can create severe disability. However, treatment methods of the curve vary. The authors evaluated the effect of adding more levels of interbody fusion during treatment of the fractional curve.METHODSA single-institution retrospective review of adult patients treated for scoliosis between 2006 and 2016 was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: fractional curves from L3 to S1 > 10°, ipsilateral radicular symptoms concordant on the fractional curve concavity side, patients who underwent at least 1 interbody fusion at the level of the fractional curve, and a minimum 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes included changes in fractional curve correction, lumbar lordosis change, pelvic incidence − lumbar lordosis mismatch change, scoliosis major curve correction, and rates of revision surgery and postoperative complications. Secondary analysis compared the same outcomes among patients undergoing posterior, anterior, and lateral approaches for their interbody fusion.RESULTSA total of 78 patients were included. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, prior surgery, fractional curve degree, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence − lumbar lordosis mismatch, sagittal vertical axis, coronal balance, scoliotic curve magnitude, proportion of patients undergoing an osteotomy, or average number of levels fused among the groups. The mean follow-up was 35.8 months (range 12–150 months). Patients undergoing more levels of interbody fusion had more fractional curve correction (7.4° vs 12.3° vs 12.1° for 1, 2, and 3 levels; p = 0.009); greater increase in lumbar lordosis (−1.8° vs 6.2° vs 13.7°, p = 0.003); and more scoliosis major curve correction (13.0° vs 13.7° vs 24.4°, p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences among the groups with regard to postoperative complications (overall rate 47.4%, p = 0.85) or need for revision surgery (overall rate 30.7%, p = 0.25). In the secondary analysis, patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) had a greater increase in lumbar lordosis (9.1° vs −0.87° for ALIF vs transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF], p = 0.028), but also higher revision surgery rates unrelated to adjacent-segment pathology (25% vs 4.3%, p = 0.046). Higher ALIF revision surgery rates were driven by rod fracture in the majority (55%) of cases.CONCLUSIONSMore levels of interbody fusion resulted in increased lordosis, scoliosis curve correction, and fractional curve correction. However, additional levels of interbody fusion up to 3 levels did not result in more postoperative complications or morbidity. ALIF resulted in a greater lumbar lordosis increase than TLIF, but ALIF had higher revision surgery rates.

Download Full-text

Posterior fixation can further improve the segmental alignment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with oblique lumbar interbody fusion

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-021-04086-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jingye Wu ◽

Tenghui Ge ◽

Ning Zhang ◽

Jianing Li ◽

Wei Tian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interbody Fusion ◽

Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽

Reduction Ratio ◽

Posterior Fixation ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Slip Ratio ◽

Radiographic Parameters ◽

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽

Segmental Lordosis

Abstract Background For patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, whether additional posterior fixation can further improve segmental alignment is unknown, compared with stand-alone cage insertion in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure. The aim of this study was to compare changes of the radiographical segmental alignment following stand-alone cage insertion and additional posterior fixation in the same procedure setting of OLIF for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods A retrospective observational study. Selected consecutive patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent OLIF procedure from July 2017 to August 2019. Five radiographic parameters of disc height (DH), DH-Anterior, DH-Posterior, slip ratio and segmental lordosis (SL) were measured on preoperative CT scans and intraoperative fluoroscopic images. Comparisons of those radiographic parameters prior to cage insertion, following cage insertion and following posterior fixation were performed. Results A total of thirty-three patients including six males and twenty-seven females, with an average age of 66.9 ± 8.7 years, were reviewed. Totally thirty-six slipped levels were assessed with thirty levels at L4/5, four at L3/4 and two at L2/3. Intraoperatively, with only anterior cage support, DH was increased from 8.2 ± 1.6 mm to 11.8 ± 1.7 mm (p < 0.001), DH-Anterior was increased from 9.6 ± 2.3 mm to 13.4 ± 2.1 mm (p < 0.001), DH-Posterior was increased from 6.1 ± 1.9 mm to 9.1 ± 2.1 mm (p < 0.001), the slip ratio was reduced from 11.1 ± 4.6% to 8.3 ± 4.4% (p = 0.020) with the slip reduction ratio 25.6 ± 32.3%, and SL was slightly changed from 8.7 ± 3.7° to 8.3 ± 3.0°(p = 1.000). Following posterior fixation, the DH was unchanged (from 11.8 ± 1.7 mm to 11.8 ± 2.3 mm, p = 1.000), DH-Anterior and DH-Posterior were slightly changed from 13.4 ± 2.1 mm and 9.1 ± 2.1 mm to 13.7 ± 2.3 mm and 8.4 ± 1.8 mm respectively (P = 0.861, P = 0.254), the slip ratio was reduced from 8.3 ± 4.4% to 2.1 ± 3.6% (p < 0.001) with the slip reduction ratio 57.9 ± 43.9%, and the SL was increased from 8.3 ± 3.0° to 10.7 ± 3.6° (p = 0.008). Conclusions Compared with stand-alone cage insertion, additional posterior fixation provides better segmental alignment improvement in terms of slip reduction and segmental lordosis in OLIF procedures in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Download Full-text

Feasibility of Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion through the Posterior Paraspinal Approach: Technical Note and Preliminary Result

10.21203/rs.3.rs-28307/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Hyeun-Sung Kim ◽

Harshavardhan Dilip Raorane ◽

Pang Hung Wu ◽

Dong Hwa Heo ◽

Yeon Jin Yi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Plain Radiograph ◽

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Disc Height ◽

Graft Material ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Paraspinal Approach ◽

Segmental Lordosis

Abstract Background: The implement of endoscopic spinal surgery into degenerative spinal disease has minimized the requirement of fusion procedures. However, it is still necessary to develop endoscopic spine surgery in certain patients requiring fusion such as instability. We performed a full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(eTLIF) through a conventional paraspinal approach. The feasibility of procedure and early outcome were evaluated.Materials and Methods: eighteen consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar disease underwent eTLIF through a conventional paraspinal approach. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated with visual analog scale(VAS) leg pain score, Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) and the MacNab's criteria; radiological outcome measured with segmental lordosis, global lumbar lordosis, disc height on plain radiograph and percentage of potential fusion mass on CT scan at pre-operative, post-operative and final follow up period. intra operative and post-operative complications noted.Results: Mean age was 63. 71 years and Mean follow-up periods was 7.78 months. According to the level, L2-3 (1 case), L3-4 (4 cases), L4-5 (13 cases) and L5-S1 (2 cases). In the X-ray result, mean segmental lordosis angle(SLA) improved in pre-operative/post-operative/follow-up period 9.87±2.74 degree/ 11.79±3.74 degree/ 10.56±3.69 degree (p > 0.01); mean lumbar lordosis angle(LLA) improved 37.1±7.04 degree/ 39.2±7.13 degree/ 35.7±7.25 degree(p > 0.01). Mean preoperative disc height(DH) improved from 8.97±1.49 mm/ 12.34±1.39 mm/ 11.44±1.98 mm (p < 0.01). In the CT result, Average percentage of fusion mass was 42.61%. VAS was improved significantly, 7.67 / 3.39 / 2.5 and ODI was improved significantly, 74.9 / 34.56 / 27.76 by each preoperative / postoperative / final follow-up. In the clinical result, excellent was 5 cases and good was 13 cases. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, eTLIF was competent enough to perform as open TLIF. and good results were obtained in the form of endplate preservation, disc height restoration, minimal blood loss and post-operative pain with early mobilization. In addition, the fusion volume including the cage and the bone graft material occupies 40% to 50% of disc space is expected to give sufficient fusion by using 3D printed cages which gives the high fusion rate. In conclusion, eTLIF is considered to be a viable surgical procedure.

Download Full-text

Repeated adjacent-segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2014.2.spine13800 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 20 (5) ◽

pp. 538-541 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Shinya Okuda ◽

Takenori Oda ◽

Ryoji Yamasaki ◽

Takafumi Maeno ◽

Motoki Iwasaki

Keyword(s):

Interbody Fusion ◽

Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽

Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Adjacent Segment ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Primary Operation ◽

The Third

One of the most important sequelae affecting long-term results is adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Although several reports have described the incidence rate, there have been no reports of repeated ASD. The purpose of this report was to describe 1 case of repeated ASD after PLIF. A 62-year-old woman with L-4 degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent PLIF at L4–5. At the second operation, L3–4 PLIF was performed for L-3 degenerative spondylolisthesis 6 years after the primary operation. At the third operation, L2–3 PLIF was performed for L-2 degenerative spondylolisthesis 1.5 years after the primary operation. Vertebral collapse of L-1 was detected 1 year after the third operation, and the collapse had progressed. At the fourth operation, 3 years after the third operation, vertebral column resection of L-1 and replacement of titanium mesh cages with pedicle screw fixation between T-4 and L-5 was performed. Although the patient's symptoms resolved after each operation, the time between surgeries shortened. The sacral slope decreased gradually although each PLIF achieved local lordosis at the fused segment.

Download Full-text

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF): Technique Video: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Operative Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/ons/opaa132 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 19 (4) ◽

pp. E404-E404 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Pingguo Duan ◽

Jeremy M V Guinn ◽

Brenton Pennicooke ◽

Ratnesh N Mehra ◽

Chih-Chang Chang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Surface Area ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Ventral Surface ◽

Surgical Anatomy ◽

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Direct Access ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Disc Space ◽

Implant Size ◽

Segmental Lordosis

Abstract This surgical video demonstrates the technique of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). This video demonstrates the surgical approach, technical nuances of ALIF, and pearls. The main surgical anatomy and approach-related risks are discussed. The video demonstrates the nuances of ALIF, discussing the importance of the release of the disc space to allow for height restoration and lordosis, endplate preparation to enhance arthrodesis, and choice of implant size. The incision is made via a left paramedian approach with a retroperitoneal dissection and mobilization of the vasculature for access to the disc space. The ALIF provides direct access to the ventral surface of the exposed disc, allowing for an incision of the anterior longitudinal ligament, bilateral release of the annulus fibrosus, and access to a large surface area of the vertebral endplate. This anterior access allows for the placement of implants with a greater surface area for fusion, and this facilitates restoration of segmental lordosis, disc height improvement, and foraminal height increase. We have received informed consent from this patient for the video of this case.

Download Full-text