International Policy Issues

Author(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 85-104
Author(s):  
Ryan Lebans ◽  
Lauren Peirce ◽  
Kevin Verberne

The traditional conception of watertight compartmentalization between “domestic” and “international” policy issues is simply no longer realistic. The advent of globalization has fundamentally altered how we perceive of policy-making. as Sidney Tarrow put it, “[i]n today’s world, we can no more draw a sharp line between domestic and international politics than we can understand national politics in the United states apart from its local roots” (Tarrow, 2005: 2). The rise of the international importance of the climate change issue is perhaps the most prominent example of the breakdown of the traditional local versus global policy distinction.


2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 1550001
Author(s):  
K. C. Fung ◽  
Nathalie Aminian ◽  
Alicia Garcia-Herrero

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (02) ◽  
pp. 473-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica F. Green ◽  
Thomas N. Hale

ABSTRACT Despite the increasing urgency of many environmental problems, environmental politics remains at the margins of the discipline. Using data from the Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) project, this article identifies a puzzle: the majority of international relations (IR) scholars find climate change among the top three most important policy issues today, yet fewer than 4% identify the environment as their primary area of research. Moreover, environmental research is rarely published in top IR journals, although there has been a recent surge in work focused on climate change. The authors argue that greater attention to environmental issues—including those beyond climate change—in IR can bring significant benefits to the discipline, and they discuss three lines of research to correct this imbalance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document