Anthropometric and Anthroposcopic Findings of the Nasal and Facial Region in Cleft Patients before and after Primary Lip and Palate Repair

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie G. Farkas ◽  
Karel Hajniš ◽  
Jeffrey C. Posnick
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Nasal Bridge ◽  
Facial Region ◽  
Nasal Tip ◽  
Flat Nasal Bridge ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Upper Face ◽  
Palate Repair

Two populations were studied and compared to determine the effects of cleft lip and palate surgery on the nose and face. In the first, three anthropometric measurements, two nasal and one facial, were taken before primary lip repair from infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). In the second, ten measurements were taken from the nose and face of patients surgically treated for UCLP and BCLP. The high frequency of noses disproportionately wide in relation to their height in both cleft types before primary lip repair greatly decreased after surgery. Among the residual deformities after surgery for UCLP, nostril floor width asymmetry was the most frequent, followed by columella length asymmetry, flat nasal bridge, wide soft nose, flat nasal tip, and small nasal tip protrusion. In the BCLP patients, nostril floor width asymmetry was also the most common stigma, followed by flat nasal tip, wide soft nose, columella length asymmetry, flat nasal bridge and bilaterally angled alae, and small nasal tip protrusion. A subnormally flat upper face inclination was observed in UCLP and BCLP patients. Quantitative determination of these nasal stigmata in cleft lip and palate patients who have undergone primary lip repair provides valuable information for surgical correction of the cleft soft-tissue deformities.

scholarly journals Determination of occlusal connections in patients with congenital cleft lip and palate before and after their orthopedic rehabilitation

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
Roman Ilyk ◽  
Markiyan Oliynyk
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Occlusal Contact ◽  
Contact Points ◽  
Orthopedic Rehabilitation ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Congenital Cleft

The aim of this study was to define and analyze the reproducibility of occlusal relationships according to the results of occlusogram in jaw closure using quantitative analysis of occlusion in adult patients with congenital cleft lip and palate before and after their prosthesis with different versions of dentures and types of their constructive features. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on 37 patients with congenital cleft lip and palate, 11 (29.73 %) of whom had right-sided clefts, 11 (29.73 %) – left-sided and 15 (40.54 %) – bilateral. The number of occlusal contact points was measured for all patients before the treatment and after the orthopaedic rehabilitation. Research results. Significant differences were found between the number of occlusal contact points before (unusually small number) and after orthopaedic treatment (significant increase), regardless of the type of cleft (p<0.001). Such conditions in the oral cavity significantly complicate the tactics of orthopaedic rehabilitation, which affects the need to find more complex options for combinations of fixed and removable orthopaedic structures. Conclusion. Based on the conditions and objectives of this study, the application of the basic principles of a multidisciplinary approach determine the possibility of rehabilitation of such patients by orthopedic methods by making different versions of orthopedic structures. Adequate and high-quality prosthesis for defects and deformations of the teeth rows and occlusion in patients with CCLP leads to improved occlusal relationships and increase in the number of occlusal contact points.

Treating Velopharyngeal Inadequacy Using Bilateral Buccal Flap Revision Palatoplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-892
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Napoli ◽  
Linda D. Vallino
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Buccal Flap

Purpose The 2 most commonly used operations to treat velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) are superiorly based pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, both of which may result in hyponasal speech and airway obstruction. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the bilateral buccal flap revision palatoplasty (BBFRP) as an alternative technique to manage VPI while minimizing these risks and (b) conduct a systematic review of the evidence of BBFRP on speech and other clinical outcomes. A report comparing the speech of a child with hypernasality before and after BBFRP is presented. Method A review of databases was conducted for studies of buccal flaps to treat VPI. Using the principles of a systematic review, the articles were read, and data were abstracted for study characteristics that were developed a priori. With respect to the case report, speech and instrumental data from a child with repaired cleft lip and palate and hypernasal speech were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Eight articles were included in the analysis. The results were positive, and the evidence is in favor of BBFRP in improving velopharyngeal function, while minimizing the risk of hyponasal speech and obstructive sleep apnea. Before surgery, the child's speech was characterized by moderate hypernasality, and after surgery, it was judged to be within normal limits. Conclusion Based on clinical experience and results from the systematic review, there is sufficient evidence that the buccal flap is effective in improving resonance and minimizing obstructive sleep apnea. We recommend BBFRP as another approach in selected patients to manage VPI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9919352

Repair of Recurrent Cleft Palate with Free Vastus Lateralis Muscle Flap

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G. Christiano ◽  
Amir H. Dorafshar ◽  
Eduardo D. Rodriguez ◽  
Richard J. Redett
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Vastus Lateralis ◽  
Muscle Flap ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Vastus Lateralis Muscle ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Lateralis Muscle ◽  
Palate Repair

A 6-year-old girl presented with a large recalcitrant oronasal fistula after bilateral cleft lip and palate repair and numerous secondary attempts at fistula closure. Incomplete palmar arches precluded a free radial forearm flap. A free vastus lateralis muscle flap was successfully transferred. No fistula recurrence was observed at 18 months. There was no perceived thigh weakness. The surgical scar healed inconspicuously. Free flaps should no longer be considered the last resort for treatment of recalcitrant fistulas after cleft palate repair. A free vastus lateralis muscle flap is an excellent alternative, and possibly a superior option, to other previously described free flaps.

Impact of cleft palate repair on speech and development of dentoalveolar deformities

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Stebeleva ◽  
◽  
Ad.A. Mamedov ◽  
Yu.O. Volkov ◽  
A.B. McLennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Normal Functioning ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Congenital Cleft ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Late Postoperative Period

Surgical repair of cleft palate is quite difficult because it aims not only to eliminate the anatomical defect of the palate, but also to ensure normal functioning, including speech. Moreover, successful surgery implies no or minimal deformation of the middle face that can be corrected in the late postoperative period. No doubt that primary surgery (both in terms of technique and time) is crucial for further growth and development of the maxilla. However, surgical techniques and the age of primary cleft palate repair vary between different clinics, which makes this literature review highly relevant. Key words: cleft palate repair, cleft palate, congenital cleft lip and palate

Timing of palate repair affecting growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. e358-e362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Xu ◽  
Qian Zheng ◽  
Dawei Lu ◽  
Ning Huang ◽  
Jingtao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Palate Repair

Morphologic Effect of Preoperative Maxillofacial Orthopedics (T-Traction) on the Maxilla in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Larson ◽  
Kjell-Ove Sällström ◽  
Ola Larson ◽  
John Mcwilliam ◽  
Margareta Ideberg
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
External Device ◽  
Normal Anatomy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Dental Casts

Sixty-eight children born with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate were studied using dental casts taken at ages 0-0,1; 0,2-0,4; and 0,5-0,6 years of age. They were all treated with preoperative maxillofacial orthopedics using an external device (T-traction). The treatment was started after the first model was taken. Dental casts were analyzed regarding the morphology of the cleft region and the maxillary segments before and after treatment. The measurements were compared with measurements on dental casts of nontreated cleft children of similar age. The results suggest that a more normal anatomy of the cleft region occurs during the first 6 months of life whether preoperative maxillofacial orthopedics (T-traction) is used or not. However, this normalized growth seems to occur faster with the T-traction.

scholarly journals Corelation Of Parents’ Profiles Of Children With Late Cleft Repair In Surabaya Cleft Lip And Palate Centre (January 2015 – December 2017)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Laras Puspita Ningrum ◽  
Iswinarno Doso Saputro ◽  
Lobredia Zarasade
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Speech Disorders ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Background : Optimal time of  Cleft palate repair is during the 10 to 12  month of age. In this time produce far natural results in terms of speech because it enabled the maturation of scar tissue postoperatively. The soft palate must function properly before the patient starts learning to talk, otherwise speech disorders such as persistent rhinolalia aperta might arise. In pediatric patients, the role of parents is very important on adherence to therapy.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The first study group was parents of patients who had surgical repair before two years old and the second group was the parents of patients who had repair after two years old. We compared age, monthly income, education level, number of children, and residential distance from Surabaya of the two groups.Results : The data of this study were obtained from the medical records of patients with cleft lip surgery at CLP Center Surabaya in 2015th – 2017th with total of 358 patients, 172 were female and 186 were male. 52 patients with delayed cleft palate surgery. Patients’ parents in both groups were mostly 31-40 years old, were high school graduated, has one child, earned less than 1.5 million rupiah a month, and lived less than 100 kms from Surabaya. From the statistical results, parent’s income has the strongest correlation with the patient’s age in cleft palate surgery (-2.7). A negative coefficient means that the less parent’s income, the more patient likely had delayed cleft palate surgery. While other factors found weak and very weak correlations.Conclusions: The results form patient's parents' interview, concluded that besides economic factors, the lack of information cleft palate treatment is the key factors that contributed to the delay of cleft palate repair. The education level does not affect the delay in cleft palate surgery, because even in high educated parents, sometimes they don’t understand the stages of cleft lip and palate treatment. This study emphasized the necessity to educate about the stages of surgery by primary care physicians, to minimize delays.

scholarly journals Antropometric Evaluation Of Gentur's Cheiloplasty Method In Unilateral Cleft Lip

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-60
Author(s):  
Rani Septrina ◽  
Gentur Sudjatmiko
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Anthropometric Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Palate Patient ◽  
Vertical Height ◽  
Rotation Advancement

Background: Cheiloplasty, the earliest surgical procedure in cleft lip and palate patient, has impact on functional and aesthetical appearance1. The Gentur’s technique is a method of cleft lip surgery that has been developed by him and has been used in RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo/Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia2. It uses the rotation-advancement, small triangular, preventing notching concepts with some other details to overcome the wide cleft. This study was conducted to answer whether the Gentur’s technique gives symmetrical result in anthropometric measurements. Methods: Cross sectional analytic study will be taken from medical record in 14 unilateral cleft lip patients underwent cheiloplasty procedure. Direct anthropometric data before and after procedure were analyzed using SPSS17. Anthropometric data such as cupid’s bow, vertical height, horizontal height, vermillion and nostril were noted. Results: From 14 patients, we found 9 patients who underwent surgery in 3 months of age (64.3%) are mostly female (n=9, 64.3%), have complete defect (n=12, 85.8%) and left sided defect (n=8, 57.1%). Gentur’s technique is able to produce significant lip and nose symmetry (CI 95%, pvalue <0.005) in cupid’s bow, vertical height, horizontal height, thickness of vermillion and nose. By doing this technique, the author is able to create good lip and nose symmetry (78.57%) even in wide defect (64.3%) and palatal collapse (57.1%). Conclusion: Gentur’s technique is able to utilize tissue deficiency to create ideal lip and nose in unilateral cleft lip repair even in patients with wide gap.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document