Alveolar Bone Graft: Clinical Profile and Risk Factors for Complications in Oral Cleft Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Macedo Pessoa Erica Alexandra ◽  
Braune Andre ◽  
Ladeira Casado Priscila ◽  
Nivoloni Tannure Patricia
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Oral Cleft

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate clinical aspects and predisposing factors for alveolar bone graft complications in persons born with oral clefts. Design A total of 105 patients, aged 7 to 57 years old, who received alveolar bone graft at the Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery Center in the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO), Rio de Janeiro (RJ) from 2009 to 2014 were selected. Data were collected concerning the type of oral cleft, family history of cleft, medical and dental exam, donor area, type of graft material, repaired surgical treatment done, and postoperative follow-up examinations. Results Postoperative complications developed in 31 patients (32.9%). The mean age at grafting was 16.79 years for the group without complications (n = 63) and 20.13 years for the group with postoperative complications (n = 31). There was a positive association between age and type of graft and cases with alveolar bone graft complications. Patients aged 12 years or more had a four times more chance of developing alveolar bone graft complications. Particulate bone graft from iliac crest demonstrated better results compared with block graft or mixed graft. Conclusion Patients with cleft lip and palate who were 12 years or older had a greater chance of developing complications after grafting the alveolar bone. Furthermore, particulate alveolar graft from iliac crest had significantly better outcomes.

Racial Disparities Affect Timing of Alveolar Bone Grafting for Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: An Analysis of the 2012 Kids’ Inpatient Database

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162110485
Author(s):  
Alfredo Cepeda ◽  
Mary T. Austin ◽  
Phuong D. Nguyen ◽  
John F. Teichgraeber ◽  
Matthew R. Greives
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Sociodemographic Factors ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Income Quartile ◽  
Inpatient Database

Objective: The timing of alveolar bone graft (ABG) for patients with cleft lip and palate is critical to the success of the operation. Sociodemographic factors have been implicated in delaying surgery for other diagnoses but their impact on patients undergoing ABG is unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the association of sociodemographic factors on the age of patients undergoing ABG. Methods: The Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) from 2012 was used to define a cohort of patients with cleft lip and/or palate between the ages of 5 and 14. Patients were selected using ICD-9 procedure codes for repair of oronasal fistula and bone graft. Gender, race, income quartile, hospital region, and type of insurance were used as independent variables. Time to ABG was then calculated as hazard ratios (HR) of having surgery using Cox regression models with 95% confidence intervals. Results: A cohort of 395 patients was identified. Median age at ABG was 9 ± 0.15 years. On univariate analysis, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients underwent surgery later than Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (11.13 ± 0.44 years vs 9.67 ± 0.19 years, P = .0026). Patients in the higher 2 income quartiles were more likely to have an early surgery as compared to those in the lowest quartile (9.16 ± 0.43 and 9.32 ± 0.43 years vs 10.20 ± 0.33, P = .016 and 0.043 respectively). No factor was significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Patients who are NHB are associated with delayed time to ABG as compared to NHW. Conversely, those in the upper income quartile by zip code underwent surgery at an earlier age. While this study identifies demographic factors associated with delay of ABG, more research is needed to understand the direct causal effects for this delay in surgery and its implication for future growth and need for orthognathic surgery.

Long-Term Stability of Alveolar Bone Graft in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Arezoo Jahanbin ◽  
Elaheh Kamyabnezhad ◽  
Mohammad Ali Raisolsadat ◽  
Fahimeh Farzanegan ◽  
Erfan Bardideh
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Term Stability ◽  
Long Term Stability

Iliac Crest Donor Site for Children With Cleft Lip and Palate Undergoing Alveolar Bone Grafting

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wheeler ◽  
Megan Sanders ◽  
Stanley Loo ◽  
Zac Moaveni ◽  
Glenn Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

scholarly journals Eruption of Impacted Teeth in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients following Alveolar Bone Graft

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1072-1075
Author(s):  
Matheus C Bandeca ◽  
Alvaro H Borges ◽  
Mateus R Tonetto ◽  
Suellen L Lima ◽  
Andreza MF Aranha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Impacted Teeth

scholarly journals Effects of Different Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft on Craniofacial Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Brudnicki ◽  
Ewa Sawicka ◽  
Renata Brudnicka ◽  
Piotr Stanisław Fudalej
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Retrospective Assessment ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Negative Effect

Objective: To evaluate the effect of the timing of secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) on craniofacial morphology in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Design: Single-center retrospective assessment of consecutively treated nonsyndromic patients with complete UCLP. Participants: One hundred sixty-seven patients (108 males, 59 females) with complete UCLP in whom the cleft was repaired with 1-stage method at approximately 8 months of age. The age of 128 patients at SABG varied from 1.4 to 11.5 years (SABG group), while 39 patients still awaited SABG at the moment of cephalometric evaluation (no-SABG group). Methods: Craniofacial morphology was assessed on lateral cephalograms taken at 10 years of age (standard deviation = 0.8; range: 7.5-12.3) using linear and angular measurements. T tests and regression models were made to analyze data. Results: Regression models demonstrated that the effect of SABG on the craniofacial morphology was limited—cephalometric variables which were statistically significantly different between SABG and no-SABG groups showed no association with the timing of SABG when (1) age of primary repair of the cleft, (2) age of cephalometric evaluation, (3) cleft side, (4) gender, and (5) operator were controlled for. Only the length of the maxilla (Condylion-point A) was affected—1-year delay of SABG corresponded with an increase in Co-point A distance by 0.52 mm. However, adjusted R 2 of the model was 0.11. Conclusions: Our findings cautiously indicate that SABG performed before 8 years of age can have limited negative effect on craniofacial morphology. Nevertheless, our results should be confirmed by cleft centers practicing alternative surgical repairs of the cleft.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document