TURBULENT PRANDTL NUMBER IN THE NEAR-WALL REGION: STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF THE MOLECULAR PRANDTL NUMBER, TRANSPIRATION AND LONGITUDINAL PRESSURE GRADIENT

Author(s):  
Alexander Leontiev ◽  
Valerii G. Lushchik ◽  
Mariia Makarova
Author(s):  
Pranav Joshi ◽  
Xiaofeng Liu ◽  
Joseph Katz

In this study we focus on the effect of mean and fluctuating pressure gradients on the structure of boundary layer turbulence. Two dimensional, time-resolved PIV measurements have been performed upstream of and inside an accelerating sink flow for inlet Reynolds number of Reθ = 3071, and acceleration parameter of K=1.1×10−6. The time-resolved data enables us to calculate the planer projection of pressure gradient by integrating the in-plane components of the material acceleration of the fluid (neglecting out-of-plane contribution). We use it to study the effect of boundary layer scale fluctuating pressure gradients ∂p′~/∂x, which are expected to be mostly two-dimensional, on the flow structure. Due to the imposed mean favorable pressure gradient (FPG) within the sink flow, the Reynolds stresses normalized by the local freestream velocity decrease over the entire boundary layer. However, when scaled by the inlet freestream velocity, the stresses increase close to the wall and decrease in the outer part of the boundary layer. This trend is caused by the confinement of the newly generated vortical structures in the near-wall region of the accelerating flow due to combined effects of downward mean flow, and stretching by velocity gradients. Within both the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) and FPG boundary layers, sweeping motions mostly occur during positive fluctuating pressure gradients ∂p′~/∂x>0 as the fluid moving towards the wall is decelerated by the presence of the wall. Vorticity is depleted in the near-wall region, as the wall absorbs −ω′ from the flow by viscous diffusion. On the other hand, ejections occur mostly during periods of favorable fluctuating pressure gradients ∂p′~/∂x<0. During these periods, there is more viscous flux of vorticity −ω′ into the flow, since ∂−ω′/∂y<0 at the wall. Large scale ejection motions associated with ∂p′~/∂x<0 are more likely to transport smaller scale turbulence to the outer region of the boundary layer, while turbulence remains largely confined close to the wall due to the sweeping motions accompanying ∂p′~/∂x>0. During periods of ∂p′~/∂x>0 in the ZPG boundary layer, sweeps tend to increase the momentum in the near-wall region, whereas the adverse pressure gradient decelerates the fluid. These competing effects result in an unstable ω′<0 shear layer which rolls up into coherent vortical structures and increases ω′ω′ near the wall as compared to periods of ∂p′~/∂x<0. Due to the strong mean acceleration of the flow and weaker sweeps in the FPG boundary layer, the formation of an unstable shear layer, and hence vortical structures, is suppressed, decreasing the enstrophy close to the wall as compared to periods of ∂p′~/∂x<0.


2012 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zambri Harun ◽  
Mohamad Dali Isa ◽  
Mohammad Rasidi Rasani ◽  
Shahrir Abdullah

Single normal hot-wire measurements of the streamwise component of velocity were taken in boundary layer flows subjected to pressure gradients at matched friction Reynolds numbers Reτ ≈ 3000. To evaluate spatial resolution effects, the sensor lengths are varied in both adverse pressure gradient (APG) and favorable pressure gradient (FPG). A control boundary layer flow in zero pressure gradient ZPG is also presented. It is shown here that, when the sensor length is maintained a constant value, in a contant Reynolds number, the near-wall peak increases with (adverse) pressure gradient. Both increased contributions of the small- and especially large-scale features are attributed to the increased broadband turbulence intensities. The two-mode increase, one centreing in the near-wall region and the other one in the outer region, makes spatial resolution studies in boundary layer flow more complicated. The increased large-scale features in the near-wall region of an APG flow is similar to large-scales increase due to Reynolds number in ZPG flow. Additionally, there is also an increase of the small-scales in the near-wall region when the boundary layer is exposed to adverse pressure gradient (while the Reynolds number is constant). In order to collapse the near-wall peaks for APG, ZPG and FPG flows, the APG flow has to use the longest sensor and conversely, the FPG has to use the shortest sensor. This study recommends that the empirical prediction by Huthins et. al. (2009) to be reevaluated if pressure gradient flows were to be considered such that the magnitude of the near-wall peak is also a function of the adverse pressure gradient parameter.


1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. W. Coleman ◽  
R. J. Moffat ◽  
W. M. Kays

Heat transfer behavior of a fully rough turbulent boundary layer subjected to favorable pressure gradients was investigated experimentally using a porous test surface composed of densely packed spheres of uniform size. Stanton numbers and profiles of mean temperature, turbulent Prandtl number, and turbulent heat flux are reported. Three equilibrium acceleration cases (one with blowing) and one non-equilibrium acceleration case were studied. For each acceleration case of this study, Stanton number increased over zero pressure gradient values at the same position or enthalpy thickness. Turbulent Prandtl number was found to be approximately constant at 0.7–0.8 across the layer, and profiles of the non-dimensional turbulent heat flux showed close agreement with those previously reported for both smooth and rough wall zero pressure gradient layers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document