In-plane shear behaviour of thin low reinforced concrete panels for earthquake re-construction

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 841-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Palermo ◽  
L. M. Gil-Martín ◽  
T. Trombetti ◽  
E. Hernández-Montes
2004 ◽  
Vol 228 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 225-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Ozaki ◽  
Shodo Akita ◽  
Hiroshi Osuga ◽  
Tatsuo Nakayama ◽  
Naoyuki Adachi

Author(s):  
Kazuo KURIHARA ◽  
Nobutsugu OHMORI ◽  
Toshio TAKAHASHI ◽  
Haruji TSUBOTA ◽  
Norio INOUE ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nobutsugu Ohmori ◽  
Toshio Takahashi ◽  
Haruji Tsubota ◽  
Norio Inoue ◽  
Kazuo Kurihara ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 350 ◽  
pp. 116-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akemi Nishida ◽  
Zuoyi Kang ◽  
Minoru Nagai ◽  
Haruji Tsubota ◽  
Yinsheng Li

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-194
Author(s):  
Luís Bernardo ◽  
Saffana Sadieh

In previous studies, a smeared truss model based on a refinement of the rotating-angle softened truss model (RA-STM) was proposed to predict the full response of structural concrete panel elements under in-plane monotonic loading. This model, called the “efficient RA-STM procedure”, was validated against the experimental results of reinforced and prestressed concrete panels, steel fiber concrete panels, and reinforced concrete panels externally strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymers. The model incorporates equilibrium and compatibility equations, as well as appropriate smeared constitutive laws of the materials. Besides, it incorporates an efficient algorithm for the calculation procedure to compute the solution points without using the classical trial-and-error technique, providing high numerical efficiency and stability. In this study, the efficient RA-STM procedure is adapted and checked against some experimental data related to reinforced concrete (RC) panels tested under in-plane cyclic shear until failure and found in the literature. Being a monotonic model, the predictions from the model are compared with the experimental envelopes of the hysteretic shear stress–shear strain loops. It is shown that the predictions for the shape (at least until the peak load is reached) and for key shear stresses (namely, cracking, yielding, and maximum shear stresses) of the envelope shear stress–shear strain curves are in reasonably good agreement with the experimental ones. From the obtained results, the efficient RA-STM procedure can be considered as a reliable model to predict some important features of the response of RC panels under cyclic shear, at least for a precheck analysis or predesign.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document