scholarly journals Exploring the Racial Wealth Gap Using the Survey of Consumer Finances

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (76) ◽  
pp. 1-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Thompson ◽  
◽  
Gustavo A. Suarez
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Williams

Recognizing the specific ways that systemic racism has and continues to function in our society is essential to developing a political economy that effectively examines contemporary problems and issues, whatever they may be. To do so, this paper identifies key elements of an anti-racist perspective and uses them to illuminate critical aspects of our racial wealth gap. Given the nature of wealth – its inherent durability and transferability across generations – this paper demonstrates how the current racial wealth gap is the result of past wealth policies that privileged whites. Further, it demonstrates how our current wealth policies are not simply encouraging the concentration of wealth among the 1 percent, but also recreating a system of racial segmentation. In a time in which overtly racialized policies and laws are often illegal, our wealth policies now function as a modern version of past Jim Crow laws and norms. This paper relies on the Survey of Consumer Finances and Joint Committee on Taxation data to document its claims.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Seamster ◽  
Raphaël Charron-Chénier

Analyses of the recent surge in racial wealth inequality have tended to focus on changes in asset holdings. Debt patterns, by contrast, have remained relatively unexplored. Using 2001-2013 data from the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), we show that after peaking in 2007, debt levels for most debt types had returned to pre-financial crisis levels for blacks and whites by 2013. The primary exception to this is education debt, on which this paper focuses. We show that educational debt has increased substantially for blacks relative to whites in the past decade. We also show that this increase in debt is not attributable to differences in educational attainment across racial groups. These trends, we argue, reflect a process of predatory inclusion, where lenders and financial actors offer needed services to black households, but on exploitative terms that limit or eliminate their long-term benefits. Predatory inclusion, we propose, is one of the mechanisms behind the persistence of racial inequality in contemporary markets.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Signe-Mary McKernan ◽  
Caroline Ratcliffe ◽  
Margaret Simms ◽  
Sisi Zhang

1965 ◽  
Vol 60 (309) ◽  
pp. 370
Author(s):  
James C. Byrnes ◽  
George Katona ◽  
Charles A. Lininger ◽  
Eva Mueller

2021 ◽  
pp. JFCP-19-00022
Author(s):  
Kyoung Tae Kim ◽  
Sherman D. Hanna ◽  
Dongyue Ying

The Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) has included a 4-level risk tolerance measure since 1983. In 2016, the SCF also included an 11-level risk tolerance measure. We compare the two measures, and develop suggestions for using the new measure. While the new measure is seemingly simpler than the old measure, we demonstrate that it does not have a monotonic relationship with owning stock assets, with a pattern similar to the relationship of the old measure to stock ownership. We also identify complex patterns of factors related to different levels of the new measure, for instance education has a negative relationship at one level but positive at another level. Those using the new measure should consider the complex patterns we demonstrate.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra J. Huston ◽  
Michael S. Finke ◽  
Hyrum L. Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document