Focus on azelaic acid in topical rosacea therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Ju.S. Kovaleva ◽  
S.V. Reshetova ◽  
M.G. Nikolaeva
Keyword(s):  
1993 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-322
Author(s):  
Koichiro KAMEYAMA ◽  
Chie SAKAI ◽  
Shigeo KONDO ◽  
KohZoh YONEMOTO
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Buonomo ◽  
Jenna L. Ruggiero ◽  
Erin Warshaw

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 567
Author(s):  
Ivona Tomić ◽  
Sandra Miočić ◽  
Ivan Pepić ◽  
Dubravka Šimić ◽  
Jelena Filipović-Grčić

Acne vulgaris is a common, multifactorial, inflammatory skin disease affecting the pilosebaceous unit. Topical therapy is the first choice in the treatment of mild to moderate acne, and azelaic acid (AZA) is one of the most commonly used drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a low-dose azelaic acid nanocrystal (AZA-NC) hydrogel in the treatment of mild to moderate facial acne. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to treatment with AZA-NC hydrogel, 10%, or AZA cream, 20%, administered in quantities of approximately 1 g twice daily for 8 weeks. Efficacy of therapy was measured by the number of lesions and safety by the frequency and severity of adverse events. At week 8, the success rate of treatment with AZA-NC hydrogel, 10%, was 36.51% (p < 0.001) versus 30.37% (p < 0.001) with AZA cream. At week 8, treatment with AZA-NC hydrogel, 10%, resulted in a significant reduction in total inflammatory lesions from baseline of 39.15% (p < 0.001) versus 33.76% (p < 0.001) with AZA cream, and a reduction in non-inflammatory lesions from baseline of 34.58% (p < 0.001) versus 27.96% (p < 0.001) with AZA cream, respectively. The adverse event rate was low and mostly mild.


1988 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 1774-1777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Folahan O. Ayorinde ◽  
Gamal Osman ◽  
Robert L. Shepard ◽  
Fiona T. Powers
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document