As outlined in Chapter 1, the main intention of this book is to identify and explain forces that catalyze or prevent a more robust diffusion of wind power in the electricity sector. This chapter lays the groundwork for such an analysis by introducing and describing the main features of a common framework that can be used for guiding analysis and development of wind power development policy. The main merit of applying a common framework to case study analysis is that it makes it possible to compare wind power policies in different nations and highlight similarities and differences. In the best case scenario, comparative analysis will unearth sufficient commonalities to construct theory to help us better understand what causes wind power to flourish in one nation and flounder in another. Even if sufficient commonalities are not uncovered, a comprehensive analysis using a common framework will at least provide insight into which issues are of greatest importance in a given national context and the scale and scope of how influential variables interconnect to shape wind power development prospects. In 1983, Thomas Hughes published a book titled Networks of Power in which he described the evolution of electrification in Western society from 1880 to 1930. In undertaking his analysis, Hughes observed that the diffusion of electrification occurred amidst a “seamless web” of social, technical, economic, and political causal factors that engender the development of a specific technological regime. In his own words:. . . Electric power systems embody the physical, intellectual and symbolic resources of the society that constructs them. Therefore, in explaining changes in the configuration of power systems, the historian must examine the changing resources and aspirations of organizations, groups and individuals. Electric power systems made in different societies—as well as in different times—involve certain basic technical components and connections, but variations in the basic essentials often reveal variations in resources, traditions, political arrangements, and economic practices from one society to another and from one time to another. In a sense, electric power systems, like so much other technology, are both causes and effects of social change. . . . Power systems reflect and influence the context, but they also develop an internal dynamic. . . .
Wind power variability and power system reserves in South Africa
