scholarly journals Once more on the Fate of Intellectuals in Nazi Camps

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
George Weisz
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Sandrine Sanos

In 1955, Alain Resnais's now canonical documentary, Nuit et Brouillard (Night and Fog) ended with an ominous question, asking “who, among us, is keeping watch from this strange watchtower [of the ruins of Auschwitz] to warn of the arrival of our new executioners” who might bring about the return of the “concentrationary plague?” One man had already made it his mission to do so: the French writer and former political deportee David Rousset. Rousset had shaken the French world of letters and politics with the 1946 publication of L'univers concentrationnaire (The Concentrationary Universe), which warned of the civilizational and moral cesura that the Nazi camps had been. The term quickly became a widely used conceptual framework. Former deportee and Catholic writer Jean Cayrol borrowed from it to write his voice-over to Night and Fog. In 1949, Rousset published another text that created a scandal in Cold War France: an Appeal to “fellow deportees” calling upon them to “investigate the USSR's concentrationary universe” (Kuby, 46). This indictment fiercely divided the French left. In 1950, he brought a libel suit against another former deportee, communist writer Pierre Daix, who had accused him of amnesiac “apoliticism” (Kuby, 65–6; Dean, 61). Just before, in the wake of his Appeal, Rousset had founded an organization against concentrationary regimes with those, like him, who had been political deportees. In 1951, it put the Soviet Union on trial for crimes against humanity. Rousset and his organization were involved in many trials, eager to denounce the “new executioners” who had revived the “scourge of the camps” in the postwar world. For many today, he is an “exceptional” man because, as philosopher and critic Tzvetan Todorov argues, he was not paralyzed by the memory of “this painful experience”; instead, he harnessed it into action against dehumanizing state violence. For Todorov, Rousset had allowed morality to prevail over base political considerations.


2020 ◽  
pp. 170-205
Author(s):  
Michael Geheran

This chapter discusses the Wannsee Conference and the deportations to and the experiences of Jewish veterans in Theresienstadt. The Wannsee Conference in January 1942 established Theresienstadt as the destination for highly decorated and war-wounded Jewish veterans. The German public's negative reaction to the deportations of Jews that began the previous year, together with interventions by senior officers, pressured the Schutzstaffel (SS) to create a special camp for “privileged” types of German Jews. Theresienstadt was merely a ruse, a way station on the road to Auschwitz. But as the chapter shows, despite the brutal conditions they faced there and at other Nazi camps, Jewish veterans' connection to their former status and their identity did not abruptly end.


Author(s):  
Helen J. Whatmore-Thomson
Keyword(s):  

Chapter 5 examines the period of quiescence in KZ memory which prevailed from the mid 1960s through the 1970s across all three locations. It outlines how practices of remembrance became more routine, with anniversary years providing pops of spectacle and grandeur. It evaluates the locals’ roles and contributions to these standard rites and rituals, which were often national (or otherwise regional) in significance. Amidst the quiet, it examines occasions when locals at Vught and, for the first time, at Neuengamme evidenced a heightened involvement in commemoration. The chapter reviews growing public sensitivities to camp history by the end of the 1970s through the resurgence of an épuration counter-memory at Natzweiler, and the effects of the Holocaust miniseries, which was shown in all locations. The chapter closes with a reminder of the ongoing pragmatic reuses of the camp sites for alternative purposes at Vught and Neuengamme, and the means these provided to constrain and detract from memories of the Nazi camps.


Author(s):  
Helen J. Whatmore-Thomson

Local populations interacted and engaged with their nearby Nazi camps whether in perpetrator or occupied nations, and these interactions continued with whatever became of the camps after the war. The introduction situates the book between historiographical debates that span wartime experience and post-war national memory cultures, and discusses the conceptual relevance of bystanders as a category of analysis. It shifts the perspective of KZ history to the durable intertwinement of camp and community and argues that local engagement with sites of terror is a critical vector in KZ history and memory.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-40
Author(s):  
Gary Weissman
Keyword(s):  

Shofar ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Weissman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document