scholarly journals Identification of biology students’ misconceptions in human anatomy and physiology course through three-tier diagnostic test

Author(s):  
Andi ANDARİANA ◽  
Siti ZUBAİDAH ◽  
Susriyati MAHANAL ◽  
Endang SUARSINI
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Miswandi Tendrita

Human Anatomy and Physiology is one of the courses for biology students that is abstract so that not a few students have difficulty studying it. Errors in answering questions can be used as clues to determine the student's mastery of material. This study aims to determine student errors in solving problems in the Human Anatomy & Physiology course. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The data collection method used is the test method. The subjects in this study were biology education students in semester V of the Nineteenth November University Kolaka Academic Year 2019/2020 who took Human Anatomy and Physiology courses. The instrument used in this study was the UAS test questions in the Human Anatomy & Physiology course. The results of the analysis showed that the most difficult questions for students to understand were questions on the function of the eye parts where the points obtained by nine students were only 2 points with the percentage of correct answers only 2%. While the questions on autoimmune disease material got the most correct percentage of answers where the number of points was nine students, namely 31 with a percentage of 34%. From the research results, it can be concluded that by analyzing student errors in answering questions, it can be seen what material is difficult for students to understand so that it can help lecturers to improve the learning process in the following semester.


HAPS Educator ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-515
Author(s):  
Chasity O’Malley ◽  
◽  
Julie Doll ◽  
Catherine Taylor ◽  
Marian Leal ◽  
...  

HAPS Educator ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Vicki Motz ◽  
Timothy Koneval ◽  
Jill Bennett-Toomey ◽  
Rema Suniga ◽  
Jacqueline Runestad Connour

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Brown ◽  
S. White ◽  
N. Power

Using an educational data mining approach, first-year academic achievement of undergraduate nursing students, which included two compulsory courses in introductory human anatomy and physiology, was compared with achievement in a final semester course that transitioned students into the workplace. We hypothesized that students could be grouped according to their first-year academic achievement using a two-step cluster analysis method and that grades achieved in the human anatomy and physiology courses would be strong predictors of overall achievement. One cohort that graduated in 2014 ( n = 105) and one that graduated in 2015 ( n = 94) were analyzed separately, and for both cohorts, two groups were identified, these being “high achievers” (HIGH) and “low achievers” (LOW). Consistently, the anatomy and physiology courses were the strongest predictors of group assignment, such that a good grade in these was much more likely to put a student into a high-achieving group. Students in the HIGH groups also scored higher in the Transition to Nursing course when compared with students in the LOW groups. The higher predictor importance of the anatomy and physiology courses suggested that if a first-year grade-point average was calculated for students, an increased weighting should be attributed to these courses. Identifying high-achieving students based on first-year academic scores may be a useful method to predict future academic performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document