Protein assessment by the Bradford method v1 (protocols.io.rutd6wn)

protocols.io ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Maciel
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
pp. 50-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Qian ◽  
Hongxia Dong ◽  
Xiaojing Hu ◽  
Hong Tian ◽  
Linfeng Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nuria Pedrol Bonjoch ◽  
Pilar Ramos Tamayo

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Farias ◽  
Katia L. Yasunaga ◽  
Romulo V.R. Peixoto ◽  
Micaella P. Fonseca ◽  
Wagner Fontes ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to compare two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification. Tear samples were collected from 29 healthy dogs (58 eyes) using Schirmer tear test (STT) strip and microcapillary tubes. The samples were frozen at -80ºC and analyzed by the Bradford method. Results were analyzed by Student's t test. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with microcapillary tube were 4.45mg/mL ±0.35 and 4,52mg/mL ±0.29 for right and left eyes respectively. The average protein concentration and standard deviation from tears collected with Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip were and 54.5mg/mL ±0.63 and 54.15mg/mL ±0.65 to right and left eyes respectively. Statistically significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the methods. In the conditions in which this study was conducted, the average protein concentration obtained with the Bradford test from tear samples obtained by Schirmer Tear Test (STT) strip showed values higher than those obtained with microcapillary tube. It is important that concentration of tear protein pattern values should be analyzed according the method used to collect tear samples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document