scholarly journals Removable Singularities of Separately Harmonic Functions

Author(s):  
Sevdiyor A. Imomkulov ◽  
Sultanbay M. Abdikadirov

Removable singularities of separately harmonic functions are considered. More precisely, we prove harmonic continuation property of a separately harmonic function u(x, y) in D \ S to the domain D, when D ⊂ Rn(x) × Rm(y), n,m > 1 and S is a closed subset of the domain D with nowhere dense projections S1 = {x ∈ Rn : (x, y) ∈ S} and S2 = {y ∈ Rm : (x, y) ∈ S}.

1975 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Masaru Hara

Given a harmonic function u on a Riemann surface R, we define a period functionfor every one-dimensional cycle γ of the Riemann surface R. Γx(R) denote the totality of period functions Γu such that harmonic functions u satisfy a boundedness property X. As for X, we let B stand for boundedness, and D for the finiteness of the Dirichlet integral.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
M. T. Mustafa

For Riemannian manifoldsMandN, admitting a submersionϕwith compact fibres, we introduce the projection of a function via its decomposition into horizontal and vertical components. By comparing the Laplacians onMandN, we determine conditions under which a harmonic function onU=ϕ−1(V)⊂Mprojects down, via its horizontal component, to a harmonic function onV⊂N.


2003 ◽  
Vol DMTCS Proceedings vol. AC,... (Proceedings) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Karlsson

International audience We obtain a new result concerning harmonic functions on infinite Cayley graphs $X$: either every nonconstant harmonic function has infinite radial variation in a certain uniform sense, or there is a nontrivial boundary with hyperbolic properties at infinity of $X$. In the latter case, relying on a theorem of Woess, it follows that the Dirichlet problem is solvable with respect to this boundary. Certain relations to group cohomology are also discussed.


1948 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Verblunsky

If H(ξ, η) is a harmonic function which is defined and positive in η > 0, then there is a non-negative number D and a bounded non-decreasing function G(x) such that(For a proof, see Loomis and Widder, Duke Math. J. 9 (1942), 643–5.) If we writewhere λ > 1, then the equationdefines a harmonic function h which is positive in υ > 0. Hence there is a non-negative number d and a bounded non-decreasing function g(x) such thatThe problem of finding the connexion between the functions G(x) and g(x) has been mentioned by Loomis (Trans. American Math. Soc. 53 (1943), 239–50, 244).


2019 ◽  
Vol 149 (6) ◽  
pp. 1577-1594
Author(s):  
Clifford Gilmore ◽  
Eero Saksman ◽  
Hans-Olav Tylli

AbstractWe solve a problem posed by Blasco, Bonilla and Grosse-Erdmann in 2010 by constructing a harmonic function on ℝN, that is frequently hypercyclic with respect to the partial differentiation operator ∂/∂xk and which has a minimal growth rate in terms of the average L2-norm on spheres of radius r > 0 as r → ∞.


1997 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaihui Chen ◽  
Paul M. Gauthier

AbstractFor ameromorphic (or harmonic) function ƒ, let us call the dilation of ƒ at z the ratio of the (spherical)metric at ƒ(z) and the (hyperbolic)metric at z. Inequalities are knownwhich estimate the sup norm of the dilation in terms of its Lp norm, for p > 2, while capitalizing on the symmetries of ƒ. In the present paper we weaken the hypothesis by showing that such estimates persist even if the Lp norms are taken only over the set of z on which ƒ takes values in a fixed spherical disk. Naturally, the bigger the disk, the better the estimate. Also, We give estimates for holomorphic functions without zeros and for harmonic functions in the case that p = 2.


1862 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Everett

1. It is a well-known property of simple harmonic functions, that the sum of any two or more of them having the same period, is itself a simple harmonic function having the same period as its components. The same thing must be true of their mean, since this is equal to the sum divided by a constant; and it will still be true when the number of components is indefinitely great, and the mean becomes an integral.


1949 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Verblunsky

1. Let z = reiθ, and let h(z) denote a (regular) positive harmonic function in the unit circle r < 1. Then h(r) (1−r) and h(r)/(1 − r) tend to limits as r → 1. The first limit is finite; the second may be infinite. Such properties of h can be obtained in a straightforward way by using the fact that we can writewhere α(phgr) is non-decreasing in the closed interval (− π, π). Another method is to writewhere h* is a harmonic function conjugate to h. Then the functionhas the property | f | < 1 in the unit circle. Such functions have been studied by Julia, Wolff, Carathéodory and others.


Author(s):  
E. T. Copson

In 1902, Professor E. T. Whittaker gave a general solution of Laplace's equation in the formwhere f is an arbitrary function of the two variables. It appears that this is not the most general solution, since there are harmonic functions, such as r−1Q0(cos θ), which cannot be expressed in this form near the origin. The difficulty is naturally connected with the location of the singular points of the harmonic function. It seems therefore to be worth while considering afresh the conditions under which Whittaker's solution is valid.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document