V.—On Whittaker's Solution of Laplace's Equation

Author(s):  
E. T. Copson

In 1902, Professor E. T. Whittaker gave a general solution of Laplace's equation in the formwhere f is an arbitrary function of the two variables. It appears that this is not the most general solution, since there are harmonic functions, such as r−1Q0(cos θ), which cannot be expressed in this form near the origin. The difficulty is naturally connected with the location of the singular points of the harmonic function. It seems therefore to be worth while considering afresh the conditions under which Whittaker's solution is valid.

1925 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
E. T. Copson

§1. Whittaker has shewn that a general solution of Laplace's Equationmay be put in the formwhere f (v, u) denotes an arbitrary function of the two variables u and v; such a representation is valid only in the neighbourhood of a regular point.


1945 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-82
Author(s):  
E. T. Copson

The functionis, as is well-known, a general solution of Laplace's equation of degree −1 in (x, y, z). In 1926* I proved that the particular solution r−1Q0 (z/r) cannot be represented in this form whereas the solution r−1Q0 (y/r) can. In the present note I find a very simple expression for the latter solution in the form (1.1), and I deduce from it an apparently new integral formula for Qn (cos θ).


1914 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 118-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. B. Jeffery

In a paper recently read before this Society, Mr E. Blades obtained a general formula for spheroidal harmonics in the form of the general solution of Laplace's equation given by Professor Whittaker,If spheroidal coordinates r, θ, φ are defined bythe result obtained is


1916 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. B. Jeffery

Whittaker has shown that a general solution of Laplace's equation, ∇2V = 0, may be expressed in the formSince the harmonic property of a function is in no way dependent upon any particular set of axes it follows that the same solution must be capable of being expressed in the formwhere X, Y, Z are any second set of rectangular coordinates.


In the 'Proceedings' of the Society, vol. 87, p. 109, Mr. Jeffery obtains a general solution of Laplace’s equation in a form suitable for physical problems in connection with two spheres. As an illustration he applies his solution to the problem of finding the capacity coefficients of two equal spheres, obtaining a result which he shows to be equivalent to one of Maxwell’s series formulæ. He then computes a table of the numerical values of these coefficients.


Author(s):  
J. Pierrus

This chapter begins by proving some important properties of (i) conductors in electrostatic equilibrium, and (ii) harmonic functions. These results underpin most of the remaining questions of Chapter 3. The coefficients of capacitance for an arbitrary arrangement of conductors are introduced at an early stage, and numerical calculations then follow in a number of subsequent questions. Some important techniques (both analytical and numerical) for finding solutions to Laplace’s equation are considered. These include: the Fourier method, the relaxation method, themethod of images and the method of conformal transformation. All of these are discussed in some detail, and with appropriate examples.


1948 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Verblunsky

If H(ξ, η) is a harmonic function which is defined and positive in η > 0, then there is a non-negative number D and a bounded non-decreasing function G(x) such that(For a proof, see Loomis and Widder, Duke Math. J. 9 (1942), 643–5.) If we writewhere λ > 1, then the equationdefines a harmonic function h which is positive in υ > 0. Hence there is a non-negative number d and a bounded non-decreasing function g(x) such thatThe problem of finding the connexion between the functions G(x) and g(x) has been mentioned by Loomis (Trans. American Math. Soc. 53 (1943), 239–50, 244).


1949 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Verblunsky

1. Let z = reiθ, and let h(z) denote a (regular) positive harmonic function in the unit circle r < 1. Then h(r) (1−r) and h(r)/(1 − r) tend to limits as r → 1. The first limit is finite; the second may be infinite. Such properties of h can be obtained in a straightforward way by using the fact that we can writewhere α(phgr) is non-decreasing in the closed interval (− π, π). Another method is to writewhere h* is a harmonic function conjugate to h. Then the functionhas the property | f | < 1 in the unit circle. Such functions have been studied by Julia, Wolff, Carathéodory and others.


1984 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jang-Mei G. Wu

In [3], Barth, Brannan and Hayman proved that if u(z) is any non-constant harmonic function in ℝ2, ø(r) is a positive increasing function of r for r ≥ 1 andthen there exists a path going from a finite point to ∞, such that u(z) > ø(|z|) on Γ. Moreover, they showed by example that the integral condition above cannot be relaxed.


1939 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Ruse

This paper is a sequel to an earlier one containing a tensor formulation and generalisation of well-known solutions of Laplace's equation and of the classical wave-equation. The partial differential equation considered waswhere is the Christoffel symbol of the second kind, and the work was restricted to the case in which the associated line-elementwas that of an n-dimensional flat space. It is shown below that similar solutions exist for any n-dimensional space of constant positive or negative curvature K.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document