Conservative Management of Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Vahid Hosseini ◽  
Seyed Hesamaddin Banihashemi ◽  
Shahla Fereidooni
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2686
Author(s):  
Magdy Ahmed Loulah ◽  
Asem Fayed Mostafa ◽  
Osama Soliman El-Balky ◽  
Abdel-Rahman Mohamed Mohamed Mohamed El-Meligi

Background: The aim of the study is to study the reliability of selective conservative management of the penetrating stab abdominal wounds. Trauma is one of the most important reasons of mortality. The mechanism that underlies the penetrating trauma relates to the mode of injury. The early diagnosis of hollow viscus injuries is difficult and a delay in the diagnosis of such injuries may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is an effective for screening and initial classification of stable patients and confirmed by CT scan. The management of stable patients was either surgical exploration or selective non-operative interference with the optimal management of patients is yet to be fully elucidated for abdominal stab wounds (ASW).Methods: A prospective study of 40 patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds between June 2017 and February 2018, at Damanhour Medical National Institute.Results: The mean age of our patients was 51.9±13.3 years with predominance of males and without predominance of any side to be affected and non-significant deviation from the normal values of hemodynamic signs. The presence of air under diaphragm in X-ray films signify abdominal penetration and ultrasonographic examination (FAST) document the diagnosis and help in following up of cases. Most of hemodynamically stable patients passed conservatively with a little rate of laparotomy.Conclusions: We concluded that there is still a role for conservative management in managing stable cases of penetrating stab abdominal wound. 


1983 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Bernath ◽  
Heinrich Schutte ◽  
Rafael R.D. Fernandez ◽  
Joseph C. Addonizio

Trauma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  
Laura Cottey ◽  
Hannah Downing

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e239
Author(s):  
Bassem Abou Hussein ◽  
Labib Al Ozaibi ◽  
Alya Al Mazrouei ◽  
Faisal Badri

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
KSS Dayananda ◽  
VY Kong ◽  
JL Bruce ◽  
GV Oosthuizen ◽  
GL Laing ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION Selective non-operative management (SNOM) of abdominal stab wounds is well established in South Africa. SNOM reduces the morbidity associated with negative laparotomies while being safe. Despite steady advances in technology (including laparoscopy, computed tomography [CT] and point-of-care sonography), our approach has remained clinically driven. Assessments of financial implications are limited in the literature. The aim of this study was to review isolated penetrating abdominal trauma and analyse associated incurred expenses. METHODS Patients data across the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) are captured prospectively into the regional electronic trauma registry. A bottom-up microcosting technique produced estimated average costs for our defined clinical protocols. RESULTS Between January 2012 and April 2015, 501 patients were treated for an isolated abdominal stab wound. Over one third (38%) were managed successfully with SNOM, 5% underwent a negative laparotomy and over half (57%) required a therapeutic laparotomy. Over five years, the PMTS can expect to spend a minimum of ZAR 20,479,800 (GBP 1,246,840) for isolated penetrating abdominal stab wounds alone. CONCLUSIONS Provided a stringent policy is followed, in carefully selected patients, SNOM is effective in detecting those who require further intervention. It minimises the risks associated with unnecessary surgical interventions. SNOM will continue to be clinically driven and promulgated in our environment.


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1665-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. ZUBOWSKI ◽  
M. NALLATHAMBI ◽  
R. IVATURY ◽  
W. STAHL

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 690
Author(s):  
D.Z. Liou ◽  
A. Gangi ◽  
D. Chou ◽  
G. Barmparas ◽  
E.J. Ley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document