scholarly journals Use of laparoscopy in patients with Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds

Trauma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  
Laura Cottey ◽  
Hannah Downing
2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e239
Author(s):  
Bassem Abou Hussein ◽  
Labib Al Ozaibi ◽  
Alya Al Mazrouei ◽  
Faisal Badri

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
KSS Dayananda ◽  
VY Kong ◽  
JL Bruce ◽  
GV Oosthuizen ◽  
GL Laing ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION Selective non-operative management (SNOM) of abdominal stab wounds is well established in South Africa. SNOM reduces the morbidity associated with negative laparotomies while being safe. Despite steady advances in technology (including laparoscopy, computed tomography [CT] and point-of-care sonography), our approach has remained clinically driven. Assessments of financial implications are limited in the literature. The aim of this study was to review isolated penetrating abdominal trauma and analyse associated incurred expenses. METHODS Patients data across the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) are captured prospectively into the regional electronic trauma registry. A bottom-up microcosting technique produced estimated average costs for our defined clinical protocols. RESULTS Between January 2012 and April 2015, 501 patients were treated for an isolated abdominal stab wound. Over one third (38%) were managed successfully with SNOM, 5% underwent a negative laparotomy and over half (57%) required a therapeutic laparotomy. Over five years, the PMTS can expect to spend a minimum of ZAR 20,479,800 (GBP 1,246,840) for isolated penetrating abdominal stab wounds alone. CONCLUSIONS Provided a stringent policy is followed, in carefully selected patients, SNOM is effective in detecting those who require further intervention. It minimises the risks associated with unnecessary surgical interventions. SNOM will continue to be clinically driven and promulgated in our environment.


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1665-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. ZUBOWSKI ◽  
M. NALLATHAMBI ◽  
R. IVATURY ◽  
W. STAHL

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 690
Author(s):  
D.Z. Liou ◽  
A. Gangi ◽  
D. Chou ◽  
G. Barmparas ◽  
E.J. Ley

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. e240
Author(s):  
Desire Pantalone ◽  
Alessio Crocetti ◽  
Gianni Virgili ◽  
Giovanni Alemanno ◽  
Gherardo Maltinti ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-118
Author(s):  
Patrick Greiffenstein ◽  
Paul R. Hastings

The late 1960s was a period of significant upheaval of social, cultural, and scientific norms. The generally accepted notion of mandatory laparotomy for all penetrating abdominal injuries was among those norms being called into question across the country and many advocated expectant management of selected patients presenting with this type of injury. Leaders of the surgical community published opinions on either side of the argument. The house staff at Charity Hospital during this period was among the busiest in the nation in treating these injuries, many of them inmates of the Louisiana State Penitentiary who used self-inflicted stab wounds to the abdomen as a means of temporary respite from the inhumane conditions in the prison. Inspired, in part, by the overabundance of negative laparotomies among this group, F. Carter Nance went on to systematically challenge the standard of care. This effort constitutes one of the major forces for change of the surgical dogma of mandatory laparotomy for all abdominal stab wounds. It is the first major study to show conclusively that delayed laparotomy for perforated viscous was not significantly detrimental and posed less of a risk than unnecessary laparotomy. The circumstances surrounding this initiative constitute a powerful and heretofore unknown chapter in the history of surgical innovation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document