Source mechanism and aftershock study of the Colima, Mexico earthquake of January 30, 1973

1979 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1819-1840
Author(s):  
A. Reyes ◽  
J. N. Brune ◽  
Cinna Lomnitz

abstract The Colima earthquake (magnitude 7.5) occurred just inland from the Middle America Trench, 110 km south of the Volcan de Colima and 160 km southeast of Manzanillo, Colima, Mexico. Damage at several cities and towns was severe, 30 people were killed, and hundreds were injured. Four days after the earthquake, a six-station portable seismograph array was set up in the epicentral area as part of a cooperative program between UCSD, the University of Mexico, and the Mexican Federal Power Commission. From about 330 aftershocks recorded in the following 212 weeks, accurate locations were obtained for 50. One large aftershock had a magnitude of 6.2, the others range in local magnitude from 1.5 to 4.5. The locations outline a region approximately 90 km long and 60 km wide, in nearly the same location as the aftershock zone inferred by Kelleher et al. (1973) for the 1941 earthquake. The focal depth of the aftershocks (ranging from 2 to 30 km) and the fault-plane solutions for the main event indicated a shallow dipping thrust plane (about 30°). The seismic moment estimated from mantle rayleigh waves is 3 × 1027 dyne-cm. The pattern of aftershocks was used to estimate the source dimensions. From the moment and source dimensions the average slip was estimated to be about 1.4 m, corresponding to a stress drop of about 8 bars. The occurrence of this earthquake is discussed in terms of the general seismicity of the Middle America Trench, the convergence rate predicted by plate tectonics, and the use of seismic gap theory for earthquake prediction. The fact that this earthquake may have been in the zone of the 1941 earthquake rather than in the adjacent seismic gap, suggests that caution must be taken in using seismic gap theory to predict earthquakes in the region. It further suggests that in the adjacent seismic gap a large earthquake may be eminent, and thus the gap may be an important area for deploying seismic instruments.

1989 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Prol-Ledesma ◽  
V. M. Sugrobov ◽  
E. L. Flores ◽  
G. Ju�rez M. ◽  
Ya. B. Smirnov ◽  
...  

Geosciences ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kervin Chunga ◽  
Franz A. Livio ◽  
Carlos Martillo ◽  
Hernán Lara-Saavedra ◽  
Maria Francesca Ferrario ◽  
...  

We provide a dataset of the landslides induced by the 2016 Pedernales megathrust earthquake, Ecuador (Mw 7.8, focal depth of 20 km) and compare their spatial distribution with mapped bedrock lithology, horizontal peak ground acceleration (PGA-h) and the macroseismic intensity based on earthquake-induced environmental effects (ESI-07). We studied 192 coseismic landslides (classified as coherent, disrupted and lateral spreads) located in the epicentral area, defined by the VII to IXESI-07 isoseismals. Based on our findings, lahar deposits, tuffs and volcanoclastic units are the most susceptible to landslides occurrence. Alluvial plains with fluvial loose fine sand are the most susceptible setting for lateral spreading, with a maximum intensity of IXESI-07. The coherent landslides are frequently found in altered shale and siltstone geological units with moderate slopes (8°–16°), with typical intensity ranging between VII and VIIIESI-07. Our analysis draws a typical framework for slope movements triggered by subduction earthquakes in Ecuador. The most dangerous setting is the coastal region, a relatively highly urbanized area located near the epicenter and where liquefaction can trigger massive lateral spreading events. Coherent and disrupted landslides, dominating the more internal hilly region, can be triggered also in moderate slope settings (i.e., less than 10°). Indeed, the regression analysis between seismic intensity, PGA-h and landslide occurrence shows that most of the events occurred at PGA-h values between 0.4 g and 1.2 g, at a distance of 30 to 50 km from the rupture plane. Our database suggests that lithology and hillslope geometry are the main geological/geomorphological factors controlling coseismic landslides occurrence; while the distance from the rupture plane plays a significant role on determining the landslide size. Finally, we underline that coseismically-triggered landslides are among the most common environmental effects occurring during large subduction events that can be effectively used to properly evaluate the earthquake macroseismic field. The landslide inventory we compiled is suitable for assessing the vulnerability of physical environment from subduction earthquakes in Ecuador, and offers a primary data source for future worldwide analysis.


1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Shapiro ◽  
M. Campillo ◽  
S. K. Singh ◽  
J. Pacheco

1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. McMillen ◽  
Robert H. Enkeboll ◽  
J. Casey Moore ◽  
Thomas H. Shipley ◽  
John W. Ladd

Nature ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 425 (6956) ◽  
pp. 367-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Ranero ◽  
J. Phipps Morgan ◽  
K. McIntosh ◽  
C. Reichert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document