scholarly journals Comparison between oral ferrous ascorbate and colloidal iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 694
Author(s):  
Diksha Asati ◽  
Arvind Kumar Yadav ◽  
Sanjay Mandot

Background: Anemia is a global health issue. There is association of impaired cognition and iron deficiency anemia. Ferrous and ferric forms of oral iron preparations are available for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia. This study was conducted with an aim to compare the efficacy and safety of oral ferrous ascorbate and colloidal iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia.Methods: It was a prospective interventional study with 12 weeks of treatment protocols alternatively assigned to children diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia. Patients received either of two iron preparation used in study and they were assessed at week 0, 4, 8 and 12.Results: Hemoglobin (gm%) significantly increased from 7.40 to 12.87 in ferrous ascorbate group and from 7.24 to 11.32 in colloidal iron group at the end of 12 weeks of treatment (p<0.05). There was significant increase in corrected reticulocyte count (%) from 0.52 to 1.39 in ferrous ascorbate group and from 0.42 to 1.27 in colloidal iron group (p<0.05). Serum ferritin (mcg/liter) was also significantly increased from 11.54 to 21.53 in ferrous ascorbate group and from 10.57 to 20.52 in colloidal iron group at the end of 12 weeks (p<0.05).Conclusions: The present study concluded that the ferrous ascorbate is an efficient oral iron supplement in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in the pediatric age group compared to colloidal iron. 

2009 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Cinemre ◽  
Cemil Bilir ◽  
Feyzi Gokosmanoglu ◽  
Talat Bahcebasi

Abstract Context: In patients with coexisting iron-deficiency anemia and subclinical hypothyroidism, anemia does not adequately respond to oral iron therapy. Objective: We studied whether iron-deficiency anemia might indicate treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism. Design: Patients were assigned to a control or experimental group: 240 mg/d oral iron alone (iron group) or 240 mg/d oral iron plus 75 μg/d levothyroxine (iron/levothyroxine group). Levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, serum iron levels, ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, TSH, and free T4 were measured before and after treatment. Setting: The study was conducted at a university hospital outpatient clinic. Patients: Fifty-one patients with coexisting iron-deficiency anemia and subclinical hypothyroidism participated in the study. Intervention: Patients were treated as described above in either the iron group or the iron/levothyroxine group. Main Outcome Measure: A clinically satisfactory increase in hemoglobin was regarded as successful. Results: Mean hemoglobin levels increased by 0.4 g/dl in the iron group [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2–0.7, P = 0.001], whereas it increased by a mean of 1.9 g/dl in the iron/levothyroxine group (95% CI 1.5–2.3, P &lt; 0.0001). The increase in serum iron was greater in the iron/levothyroxine group by a mean of 47.6 μg/dl (95% CI 34.5–60.6, P &lt; 0.0001). Increases in hemoglobin, red blood cells, hematocrit, and serum ferritin levels after treatment were statistically significantly greater in the iron/levothyroxine group (P &lt; 0.0001). Starting hemoglobin and increase in hemoglobin were negatively correlated in the iron/levothyroxine group (r = −0.531, P = 0.006). Conclusions: Subclinical hypothyroidism should be treated in iron-deficiency anemia patients when both conditions coexist. This would provide a desired therapeutic response to oral iron replacement and prevent ineffective iron therapy.


Author(s):  
Satish Kumar

Introduction: Anemia is the commonest major contributing factor in maternal mortality and morbidity in developing countries and according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, it contributes to 20% of maternal deaths. Anemia in pregnancy defined as hemoglobin level <11 gm/dl (7.45 mmol/L) and hematocrit less than 33% (WHO). Aim: To compare the efficacy of oral iron ferrous sulphate therapy with intravenous iron sucrose therapy in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia during postpartum period. Material & Methods: This was a prospective randomized comparative clinical trial single center study conducted on 200 postpartum women aged >18 years (after normal delivery or LSCS) within 10 days of delivery with Hb level more or equal to 6 gm/dl but less than 10 gm/dl were included in the study. This was a one year study conducted during 1st December 2018 to 30th November 2019. Results : There was a significant increase in the hemoglobin level in both the groups i.e. in IV iron group, from 8.26 ±1.03gm/dl on day 1 to 11.62±0.94gm/dl on day 45 as compared to oral iron group, from 8.24±1.09gm/dl on day 1 to 11.07±1.14gm/dl on day 45; and serum ferritin level from 41.69±40.45ng/ml on day 1 to 77.34±41.60ng/ml on day 45 in IV iron group as compared to the oral iron group from 22.20±8.82ng/ml on day 1 to 31.72±9.72 ng/ml on day 45. So, there was a rapid increase in both hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in IV iron group as compared to the oral iron group. Conclusion: Intravenous iron sucrose administration increases the hemoglobin level and serum ferritin more rapidly in compare to the oral intake of ferrous sulphate in women with iron deficiency anemia in postpartum women in our study. Keywords: Iron deficiency anemia, Intravenous iron sucrose, Serum ferritin, Maternal mortality.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4737-4737
Author(s):  
Nilupa Gaspe Mudiyanselage ◽  
Tarek Elrafei ◽  
Beth Lewis ◽  
Mary King ◽  
Marianna Strakhan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Prior studies have indicated that transfusion is unusual (2%) in pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia. Nonetheless, compliance with oral iron replacement can be an issue and physicians may wish to use IV iron therapy in markedly anemic pregnant women. Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of adding intravenous iron sucrose concentrate (ISC) to pregnant patients already taking oral iron in terms of effect on hemoglobin, effect on ferritin levels, rates of transfusion, and cost. Methods: We analyzed all referrals from Obstetrics to Hematology clinic and Obstetrics consultation (Internal medicine) clinic from January 2014 to June 2016. Of the 176 pregnant patients, 98 were referred for anemia, including 81 patients with Hgb < 12 g/dl and ferritin < 20 ug/L. All had previously been given oral ferrous sulfate prescriptions. Patients with hemoglobinopathy were excluded. All 81 patients were advised to continue on the oral iron, and 40 were given IV iron sucrose (ISC group). Results: The average cumulative dose of iron sucrose was 700 mg, a mean of 5.575 doses (initiated in the third trimester in 38 of 40 patients). The lowest antepartum Hgb was 8.18 g/dl in the ISC group and 9.58 in the oral only group; there was an average Hgb increase of 2.17 vs 1.76 g/dl respectively (p=.107 NS and the 0.41 g/dl difference was considered to be of no clinical consequence). 89% in the ISC group vs 30% in the oral achieved a ferritin >20 (p=0.000015). No adverse events in the IV iron group were reported. There was 1 transfusion in the oral iron group attributable to iron deficiency (2.4%) vs none in the IV iron group (p = 0.107 NS). Two patients were transfused in the antenatal period before IV iron was started and 1 transfused because of post-partum hemorrhage. The total cost of the IV iron therapy would add an average of $1,500 per patient. Thus, and additional cost of $60,000 in IV iron would be required to prevent 1 transfusion [40:1]. Conclusions: ISC corrects ferritin in more patients than oral iron replacement, but did not significantly increase Hgb levels or have a meaningful impact on the transfusion rate. The additional cost and lack of clinically improved outcomes with IV iron argue against its use and in favor of strategies to ensure compliance with oral iron. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Apurva Garg ◽  
Manju Agarwal ◽  
Uma Shankar ◽  
Shrikant Shetty

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of iron sucrose with oral iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia of pregnancy.Methods: An interventional comparative study was conducted at Jhalawar Medical College, Jhalawar involving 80 pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia from March 2016 to August 2016. Inclusion criteria were gestational age between 24-32 weeks with established iron deficiency anemia, with hemoglobin between 7-10g/dl. Target Hemoglobin was 11 g/dl. In intravenous iron sucrose group iron sucrose dose was calculated from following formula: total iron dose required (mg) = 2.4 x body weight in Kg x (target Hb – Patient’s Hb g/dl) + 500. In oral iron, group patient received ferrous-sulphate 335 mg daily BD. Hb level were reviewed at 2, 4, 6 weeks.Results: Change in Hemoglobin level from baseline significantly higher in IV iron group than oral iron group. In IV iron, group mean value of baseline Hb was 8.07±0.610 g/dl and in oral iron group was 8.48±0.741 g/dl. At the end of 6-week mean hemoglobin in IV iron sucrose was 10.66±0.743 g/dl and in oral iron group was 10.08±0.860 g/dl.Conclusions: Intravenous iron sucrose elevates more Hb than oral iron, with less adverse effects.


Author(s):  
Santosh Khajotia ◽  
Shubha Meena ◽  
Deepak Naraniya

Background: Anemia is the commonest major contributing factor in maternal mortality and morbidity in developing countries and according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, it contributes to 20% of maternal deaths. Anemia in pregnancy defined as haemoglobin level <11 gm/dl (7.45 mmol/L) and haematocrit less than 33% (WHO). Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral iron ferrous sulphate therapy with intravenous iron sucrose therapy in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia during postpartum period.Methods: This was a prospective randomized comparative clinical trial single center study conducted on 200 postpartum women aged >18 years (after normal delivery or LSCS) within 10 days of delivery with Hb level more or equal to 6 gm/dl but less than 10 gm/dl were included in the study. This was a one-year study conducted during 1st December 2018 to 30th November 2019.Results: There was a significant increase in the hemoglobin level in both the groups i.e. in IV iron group, from 8.26±1.03 gm/dl on day 1 to 11.62±0.94 gm/dl on day 45 as compared to oral iron group, from 8.24±1.09 gm/dl on day 1 to 11.07±1.14 gm/dl on day 45; and serum ferritin level from 41.69±40.45 ng/ml on day 1 to 77.34±41.60 ng/ml on day 45 in IV iron group as compared to the oral iron group from 22.20±8.82 ng/ml on day 1 to 31.72±9.72 ng/ml on day 45. So, there was a rapid increase in both hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in IV iron group as compared to the oral iron group.Conclusions: Intravenous iron sucrose administration increases the hemoglobin level and serum ferritin more rapidly in compare to the oral intake of ferrous sulphate in women with iron deficiency anemia in postpartum women in our study. 


1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-661
Author(s):  
Helena U Suzuki ◽  
Mauro B Morais ◽  
Jose N Corral ◽  
Ulisses Fagundes-Neto ◽  
Nelson L Machado

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1041-1044
Author(s):  
LOUIS K DIAMOND ◽  
J. LAWRENCE NAIMAN ◽  
DONALD M. ALLEN ◽  
FRANK A. OSKI,

Experience with a new oral iron-carbohydrate complex (Jefron) in the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia shows that the therapeutic results are inferior to those obtainable with ferrous sulfate. Many children showed no response after months of treatment with this drug and when subsequently placed on ferrous sulfate therapy showed a rapid rise in hemoglobin to normal levels. Preliminary studies suggest that poor gastrointestinal absorption may be a factor in the inadequate therapeutic effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document