scholarly journals Evaluation of results of fracture head and neck of radius managed by varius methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-273
Author(s):  
Sambit Kumar Panda ◽  
Surai Soren ◽  
Ashok Kumar Nayak ◽  
Rabindra Kumar Nayak ◽  
Pravash Ranjan Parida

Radial head fractures are the most frequent fracture type reported around the elbow. Fractures have been documented to occur in isolation or with other associated osseous and soft tissue injuries. However, despite intensive research into these injuries, controversies still exist regarding the role of further imaging modalities, the use of non-operative management, as well as the indication and technique for operative intervention. To analyses the clinical and functional outcome of patients with head and neck fracture of radius managed by conservative method, open reduction and internal fixation, radial head prosthesis and radial head excision. This study “evaluation of results of fracture head and neck of radius managed by various methods” was carried out in M.K.C.G Medical College, Berhampur from September 2017 to October 2019. Eighty patients of radial head and neck fractures were treated and hereby included in our study. We collected records of the patients by asking the patients history and examining the patients. Essential investigations of all the patients were done. The primary outcome measures were the surgeon reported Mayo Elbow Score (MES) and the patient reported Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Current evidence supports open reduction and internal fixation of simple Mason type II fractures. For Mason type III fractures, controversy still exists regarding the optimal treatment. Studies currently show good to excellent results with radial head replacement in the majority of patients with Mason type III fractures with three or more fracture fragments.

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901880250
Author(s):  
Yong-Suk Lee ◽  
Young-Hoon Kang ◽  
Yang-Guk Chung ◽  
Seung-Han Shin

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the outcomes of Mason type III radial head fractures (RHFs) treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were comparable to those of Mason type II RHFs treated by ORIF. Methods: A total of 87 surgically treated RHF patients were reviewed. Their fractures were Mason type II in 39 patients (all treated by ORIF) and Mason type III in 48 patients (40 treated by ORIF, 7 by radial head arthroplasty, and 1 by resection). Although ORIF was preferred for Mason type III RHFs in our series, an arthroplasty was performed when the fracture accompanied severe associated injuries or multiple traumas. Radiological and functional outcomes were evaluated and complications were reviewed. Results: When Mason type II and Mason type III in general were compared, QuickDASH score, a shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and forearm rotation were significantly worse in Mason type III. However, when comparing Mason type II and Mason type III treated by ORIF in which the proportion of associated injuries were not significantly different, there was no significant difference in QuickDASH score, range of extension/flexion, or complication rate. Forearm rotations were significantly more limited in Mason type III treated by ORIF (7° for pronation and 7° for supination), and Mason type had an independent effect on forearm rotations in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: ORIF for Mason type III fractures with low level of associated injury can be as good as that for Mason type II fractures, except for less forearm rotation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1560-1568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ufuk Nalbantoglu ◽  
Baris Kocaoglu ◽  
Arel Gereli ◽  
Seref Aktas ◽  
Osman Guven

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanyi Liu ◽  
Erman Chen ◽  
Dingli Xu ◽  
Weihu Ma ◽  
Leijie Zhou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
ArslanAhmed Abro ◽  
ImranKhan Mangi ◽  
MuhammadNaveed Memon ◽  
Shahjahan Siyal ◽  
Naveed Khan ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. W. King ◽  
Dennis C. Evans ◽  
James F. Kellam

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document