scholarly journals The Architectural Engineering Student Experience Of Comprehensive Design Studio

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Homer
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Ciston ◽  
Maria-Isabel Carnasciali ◽  
Viktoria Zelenak ◽  
Michael Hollis

Author(s):  
Sal Alajek ◽  
Alan Ham ◽  
Heather Murdock ◽  
Jonathan Verrett

Engineering student experience is highly influenced by the interplay between curricular and extracurricular learning environments on campus. Bridging between the two spaces, Engineers Without Borders (EWB) Canada builds on curricular content with extracurricular opportunities which not only reinforce leadership and communications skills, but also focus on complexity and systems thinking, globalization trends,and foundational attitudes of service to society. In recent years, EWB has been working collaboratively with specific engineering faculties in an attempt to bring these attributes to the classroom. This paper examines the efficacy of these opportunities, which blur the line between for-credit engineering curricular interactions and not-for-credit extracurricular engineering focused activities. Drawing on examples from institutions that have implemented credit for extracurricular activities andbuilding on the 2013 Global Engineering Symposium’s engineering education focused discussions at the Engineers Without Borders Canada annual national conference in Calgary, Alberta, we highlight the potential for the concept from the perspective of the student and the faculty.


2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Badawi ◽  
M. R. Abdullah

AbstractCollaboration among disciplines is becoming a standard practice in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. However, limited studies have addressed the involvement of interdisciplinarity into architectural undergraduate curricula. The study seeks to expand the literature on this topic, namely by offering an alternative model for teaching an Interdisciplinary Design Course (IDC), mainly in architectural engineering departments, with the participation of engineering departments. The authors hypothesize that by the adoption of the IDC, architecture students would have a better understanding of the nature of AEC interdisciplinary design knowledge. The study aims to highlight the value of the IDC and to test the hypothesis. A qualitative research methodology has been adopted, including the design of an experiment and then the application of a case study comprising four instructors and 24 students from four departments in the Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University. Students’ design process, teamwork attitude, and own experiences on the IDC have been recorded using direct observation, interviews, and surveys. Data have been analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify the effectiveness and challenges of the experiment, in addition to the comparison with the traditional design studio. The results have shown the students’ satisfaction with collaboration with their peers from other disciplines, as it boosted their understanding of the integrated design process and increased their knowledge about each other’s discipline. In addition, architecture students commended the IDC much more than the traditional design studio.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-205
Author(s):  
Lesley Sylvan ◽  
Andrea Perkins ◽  
Carly Truglio

Purpose The purpose of this study is to better understand the experiences faced by students during the application process for master's degree programs in speech-language pathology. Method Data were collected through administering an online survey to 365 volunteers who had applied to master's degree programs in speech-language pathology. Survey questions were designed to gain the student perspective of the application process through exploration of students' deciding factors for top choices of graduate programs, emotional involvement in the application process, biases/rumors heard, student challenges, advice to future applicants, and what students would change about the application process. Results Factors that influenced participants' reasoning for selecting their “top choice” programs were largely consistent with previous studies. Issues that shaped the student experience applying to graduate school for speech-language pathology included financial constraints, concern regarding the prominence of metrics such as Graduate Record Examinations scores in the admissions process, a perceived lack of guidance and advising from faculty, and confusion regarding variation among graduate program requirements. Conclusion Gaining insight into the student experience with the application process for graduate programs in speech-language pathology yields useful information from a perspective not frequently explored in prior literature. While the data presented in this study suggest the process is confusing and challenging to many applicants, the discussion highlights practical solutions and sheds light on key issues that should be considered carefully by individual graduate programs as well as the field as a whole.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document