scholarly journals Shifting Cultivation: A Cautionary Note

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Falvey Lindsay ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Shifting Cultivation ◽  
Cautionary Note

scholarly journals Shifting Cultivation: A Cautionary Note

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Falvey Lindsay ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Shifting Cultivation ◽  
Cautionary Note

scholarly journals Shifting Cultivation: A Cautionary Note

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Falvey Lindsay ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Shifting Cultivation ◽  
Cautionary Note

Stop Look And listen A cautionary note about curriculum reform

1971 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 677-679
Author(s):  
HM Myers ◽  
J Hancock
Keyword(s):  
Curriculum Reform ◽  
Cautionary Note

Evaluating the Factor Structure of “Self-Concept” in Children: A Cautionary Note

1977 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Drummond ◽  
Walter G. McIntire
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Cautionary Note

A Cautionary Note on Incremental Fit Indices Reported by LISREL

Methodology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan C. Schmukle ◽  
Jochen Hardt
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Structural Equation Models ◽  
Null Model ◽  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Fit Indices ◽  
Cautionary Note ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Abstract. Incremental fit indices (IFIs) are regularly used when assessing the fit of structural equation models. IFIs are based on the comparison of the fit of a target model with that of a null model. For maximum-likelihood estimation, IFIs are usually computed by using the χ2 statistics of the maximum-likelihood fitting function (ML-χ2). However, LISREL recently changed the computation of IFIs. Since version 8.52, IFIs reported by LISREL are based on the χ2 statistics of the reweighted least squares fitting function (RLS-χ2). Although both functions lead to the same maximum-likelihood parameter estimates, the two χ2 statistics reach different values. Because these differences are especially large for null models, IFIs are affected in particular. Consequently, RLS-χ2 based IFIs in combination with conventional cut-off values explored for ML-χ2 based IFIs may lead to a wrong acceptance of models. We demonstrate this point by a confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 2449 subjects.

A cautionary note.

1972 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 777-777
Author(s):  
James M. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Cautionary Note
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document