scholarly journals TrackFit: Uncertainty Quantification, Optimal Filtering and Interpolation of Tracks for Time-Resolved Lagrangian Particle Tracking

Author(s):  
Sebastian Gesemann

Advanced Lagrangian Particle Tracking methods (such as the STB algorithm (Schanz et al. 2016)) are a very useful tool for uncovering properties of flow. As a measurement technique, the results of such methods are perturbed by different sources of errors and noise. This work addresses the problem of optimal filtering of particle tracks as well as estimating uncertainties of derived quantities such as location, velocity and acceleration of observed particles. The behavior and performance of this new filtering method (“TrackFit”), first introduced at Gesemann et al. (2016) is analyzed and compared to the Savitzky–Golay filter (Savitzky and Golay (1964)) which is commonly used for these purposes. The optimal choice of parameters of this filtering method as well as the uncertainty quantification of the reconstructed tracks can be extracted from a spectral analysis of the recorded raw particle tracking data. This is in contrast to a Savitzky–Golay filter where the choice of parameters might often be driven by experience and gut feeling. Estimating the power spectral density (PSD) of the particle trajectory signals for the purpose of optimal filtering parameter selection represents a challenge due to possibly short trajectory signals. In the following work we will present a method for PSD estimation that is applicable in this scenario. In addition, we show that regardless of the choice of Savitzky–Golay filter parameters, the resulting filter will not approximate the ideal noise reduction filter well unlike the “TrackFit” described in this work.

Author(s):  
Andrea Sciacchitano ◽  
Benjamin Leclaire ◽  
Andreas Schroeder

This work presents the main results of the first Lagrangian Particle Tracking challenge, conducted within the framework of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 project HOMER (Holistic Optical Metrology for Aero-Elastic Research), grant agreement number 769237. The challenge, jointly organised by the research groups of DLR, ONERA and TU Delft, considered a synthetic experiment reproducing the wall-bounded flow in the wake of a cylinder which was simulated by LES. The participants received the calibration images and sets of particle images acquired by four virtual cameras, and were asked to produce as output the particles positions, velocities and accelerations (when possible) at a specific time instant. Four different image acquisition strategies were addressed, namely two-pulse (TP), four-pulse (FP) and time-resolved (TR) acquisitions, each with varying tracer particle concentrations (or number of particles per pixel, ppp). The participants’ outputs were analysed in terms of percentages of correctly reconstructed particles, missed particles, ghost particles, correct tracks and wrong tracks, as well as in terms of position, velocity and acceleration errors, along with their distributions. The analysis of the results showed that the best-performing algorithms allow for a correct reconstruction of more than 99% of the tracer particles with positional errors below 0.1 pixels even at ppp values exceeding 0.15, whereas other algorithms are more prone to the presence of ghost particles already for ppp < 0.1. While the velocity errors remained contained within a small percentage of the bulk velocity, acceleration errors as large as 50% of the actual acceleration magnitude were retrieved.


2021 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 110346
Author(s):  
Peter Manovski ◽  
Matteo Novara ◽  
Nagendra Karthik Depuru Mohan ◽  
Reinhard Geisler ◽  
Daniel Schanz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Novara ◽  
Daniel Schanz ◽  
Reinhard Geisler ◽  
Sebastian Gesemann ◽  
Christina Voss ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document