Antagonism between Formulations of Different Bacillus thuringiensis Subspecies in Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Ameen ◽  
J. R. Fuxa ◽  
A. R. Richter
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Thuringiensis ◽  
Heliothis Virescens ◽  
Helicoverpa Zea ◽  
Insect Species ◽  
Median Lethal Concentrations ◽  
Lepidoptera Noctuidae

Interactions between formulations of the aizawai and kurstaki subspecies of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner were evaluated by bioassay in Heliothis virescens (F.) and Helicoverpa zea (Boddie). In preliminary experiments, a formulation of subspecies aizawai, Xentari AS®, had significantly (P < 0.05) higher median lethal concentrations (LC50s) in both insect species than formulations based on subspecies kurstaki. Helicoverpa zea was significantly (P < 0.05) more susceptible than H. virescens to one formulation of subspecies kurstaki (Dipel ES®), but the two insects did not differ in susceptibility to Xentari AS® or to a second formulation of subspecies kurstaki (Dipel 6AF®). In H. virescens, Xentari AS® was additive with Dipel 6AF® and significantly (P< 0.05) antagonistic with Dipel ES® and with a third formulation of subspecies kurstaki, Dipel 48A®. In H. zea, Xentari AS® was significantly antagonistic with all three formulations of subspecies kurstaki. This suggests that certain toxin combinations from B. thuringiensis subspecies might not be effective for managing H. virescens and H. zea populations.

Relative Activity of Commercial Formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis Against Selected Noctuid Larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Luttrell ◽  
Abbas Ali ◽  
S. Y. Young ◽  
Kathy Knighten
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Thuringiensis ◽  
Helicoverpa Zea ◽  
Crop Protection ◽  
Relative Activity ◽  
Insect Species ◽  
Unit Weight ◽  
Base Line ◽  
Spray Chamber ◽  
Median Lethal Concentrations ◽  
Chamber Studies

Diet incorporation and spray chamber assays compared the activity of three commercial formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner against Heliothis virescens (F.), Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), Pseudoplusia includens (Walker), and Spodoptera exigua (Hübner). The commercial products evaluated were Condor OF® (Ecogen Inc., Langhorne, PA), Dipel ES® (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL), and Javelin WG® (Sandoz Crop Protection Corp., Des Plaines, IL). Variation in results of the diet incorporation studies illustrated the importance of including a standard reference formulation in the design of the studies and suggested that some standardization of insect strains used in such assays may be important also. Overall results of the diet incorporation studies were similar to those obtained in the spray chamber studies where insects were assayed on sprayed cotton and soybean. Dose-mortality regressions were developed for each B. thuringiensis formulation applied against each insect species on cotton and soybean over a 28-day observation period. These regressions may be helpful in the development of recommendations for the use of B. thuringiensis on cotton and soybean. They may also have value in establishing base-line levels of susceptibility for future resistance monitoring efforts. Median lethal concentrations (LC50s) tended to be slightly higher on cotton than on soybean. The most susceptible insect species was H. virescens, and the least susceptible was S. exigua. LC50s for H. zea and P. includens were similar and intermediate between those of H. virescens and S. exigua. Javelin WG tended to exhibit the highest activity per unit weight of commercial product, but the relative differences among the commercial formulations were influenced by insect species.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document