scholarly journals Psychodynamic Understanding of Repetitive Self-Mutilation

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
Sumin Hong ◽  
Jee Hyun Ha
Author(s):  
Kenneth L Robey ◽  
John F Reck ◽  
Karen D Giacomini ◽  
Gabor Barabas ◽  
Gary E Eddey
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (09) ◽  
pp. 636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Dabrowski ◽  
Sarah A Smathers ◽  
Curt S Ralstrom ◽  
Michael A Nigro ◽  
Jimmie P Leleszi

2003 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bolognini ◽  
B. Plancherel ◽  
J. Laget ◽  
P. Stéphan ◽  
O. Halfon

The aim of this study, which was carried out in the French-speacking part of Switzerland, was to examine the relationship between suicide attempts and self-mutilation by adolescents and young adults. The population, aged 14-25 years (N = 308), included a clinical sample of dependent subjects (drug abuse and eating disorders) compared to a control sample. On the basis of the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview ( Sheehan et al., 1998 ), DSM-IV criteria were used for the inclusion of the clinical population. The results concerning the occurrence of suicide attempts as well as on self-mutilation confirm most of the hypotheses postulated: suicidal attempts and self-mutilation were more common in the clinical group compared to the control group, and there was a correlation between suicide attempts and self-mutilation. However, there was only a partial overlap, attesting that suicide and self-harm might correspond to two different types of behaviour.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-284
Author(s):  
Joseph Westermeyer
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 198 (11) ◽  
pp. 1207-1207
Author(s):  
K. M. Halprin
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
R. Gournellis ◽  
I. Michopoulos ◽  
M. Papadopoulou ◽  
D. Plachouras ◽  
K. Tournikioti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 135050762110097
Author(s):  
Amy L Fraher

This article aims to advance the psychodynamic understanding of imagination failures by studying lessons learned in the US government’s public inquiry into September 11th, 2001 (9/11). Analyzing the findings of The 9/11 Report, I theorize that two forms of macro-level hubris—America’s “hubris of empire-building” and Al Qaeda’s “hubris-nemesis complex”—amalgamated in a uniquely generative manner leading to events on 9/11. Previous studies of public inquiries often demonstrate that inquiry reports are monological story-telling performances used to create sense-making narratives that function hegemonically to impose a simplified version of reality to assign blame and depoliticize events in order to facilitate closure after shocking events. In contrast, findings here suggest that by constructing a critical narrative, The 9/11 Report may serve as a new type of public inquiry report that invites learning about the complex factors that underpin crisis. The article concludes by identifying fruitful areas of future research and ways to theorize further about the collective psychodynamics of macro-level hubris and the psychodynamic factors that hinder learning and contribute to imagination failures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document