scholarly journals SPECIES INVASION SHIFTS THE IMPORTANCE OF PREDATOR DEPENDENCE

Ecology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 3012-3021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blaine D. Griffen ◽  
David G. Delaney
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Głowacki ◽  
Andrzej Kruk ◽  
Tadeusz Penczak

AbstractThe knowledge of biotic and abiotic drivers that put non-native invasive fishes at a disadvantage to native ones is necessary for suppressing invasions, but the knowledge is scarce, particularly when abiotic changes are fast. In this study, we increased this knowledge by an analysis of the biomass of most harmful Prussian carp Carassius gibelio in a river reviving from biological degradation. The species' invasion followed by the invasion's reversal occurred over only two decades and were documented by frequent monitoring of fish biomass and water quality. An initial moderate improvement in water quality was an environmental filter that enabled Prussian carp’s invasion but prevented the expansion of other species. A later substantial improvement stimulated native species’ colonization of the river, and made one rheophil, ide Leuciscus idus, a significant Prussian carp’s replacer. The redundancy analysis (RDA) of the dependence of changes in the biomass of fish species on water quality factors indicated that Prussian carp and ide responded in a significantly opposite way to changes in water quality in the river over the study period. However, the dependence of Prussian carp biomass on ide biomass, as indicated by regression analysis and analysis of species traits, suggests that the ecomorphological similarity of both species might have produced interference competition that contributed to Prussian carp’s decline.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel A. Cushman

Ecography ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1031-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Matthews ◽  
Ariane L. Peralta ◽  
Arun Soni ◽  
Patrick Baldwin ◽  
Angela D. Kent ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 661-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc W. Cadotte ◽  
Sara E. Campbell ◽  
Shao-peng Li ◽  
Darwin S. Sodhi ◽  
Nicholas E. Mandrak

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Warren ◽  
Matt Candeias ◽  
Adam Labatore ◽  
Michael Olejniczak ◽  
Lin Yang

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Chen ◽  
Lijun Chen ◽  
Jiatian Li ◽  
Thomas P. Albright ◽  
Qinfeng Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 285 (1871) ◽  
pp. 20171936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobin D. Northfield ◽  
Susan G. W. Laurance ◽  
Margaret M. Mayfield ◽  
Dean R. Paini ◽  
William E. Snyder ◽  
...  

At local scales, native species can resist invasion by feeding on and competing with would-be invasive species. However, this relationship tends to break down or reverse at larger scales. Here, we consider the role of native species as indirect facilitators of invasion and their potential role in this diversity-driven ‘invasion paradox’. We coin the term ‘native turncoats’ to describe native facilitators of non-native species and identify eight ways they may indirectly facilitate species invasion. Some are commonly documented, while others, such as indirect interactions within competitive communities, are largely undocumented in an invasion context. Therefore, we use models to evaluate the likelihood that these competitive interactions influence invasions. We find that native turncoat effects increase with the number of resources and native species. Furthermore, our findings suggest the existence, abundance and effectiveness of native turncoats in a community could greatly influence invasion success at large scales.


2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1848-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calum MacNeil ◽  
Jaimie T. A. Dick ◽  
Mark P. Johnson ◽  
Melanie J. Hatcher ◽  
Alison M. Dunn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document