Toward Community-Based Practice: The Changing Role of the Registered Nurse in Psychiatry and Mental Health

Author(s):  
KYLIE M. SMITH ◽  
GEERTJE BOSCHMA
Author(s):  
Steve Case ◽  
Phil Johnson ◽  
David Manlow ◽  
Roger Smith ◽  
Kate Williams

This chapter examines punishment as a means of dealing with crime and its implications for justice. It first introduces the key arguments advanced in support of the idea of punishment in general and specific punitive practices in particular. It then considers the historical development of punishment and its changing role in society, along with specific forms of penal sanction such as death penalty, imprisonment, and community based alternatives to the deprivation of liberty. The chapter goes on to discuss the role of the judiciary in administering punishments as well as the consequences of imposing punitive measures. Finally, it evaluates the potential limitations of the use of punishment, including miscarriages of justice and its apparent failure to affect the likelihood of reoffending.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 462-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Madianos ◽  
J. Tsiantis ◽  
C. Zacharakis

SummaryGreece joined the European Community in 1981 and, three years later, the Commission of the European Communities provided financial and technical assistance under EEC Regulation 815/84 for the modernisation of the traditional psychiatric care system, with the emphasis on decentralisation of mental health services and the development of community-based services, as well as on deinstutionalization of long-stay patients and improvement of conditions in public mental hospitals. Over the last 11 years, the implementation of the EEC Reg. 815/84 programme contributed to a significant shift towards extramural care and rehabilitation. The role of the large mental hospitals has gradually been diminished and a large number of long-stay patients have been deinstitutionalised. It is commonly accepted that the EEC-funded psychiatric reform programme, despite inadequacies and constraints, had an impact on the changing mental health scene in Greece.


The Lancet ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 325 (8427) ◽  
pp. 507-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Sturt ◽  
Helena Waters

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Bonhoure ◽  
Anna Cigarini ◽  
Julian Vicens ◽  
Josep Perelló

“Citizen Social Science” is a fast-growing term within Citizen Science world but not many experiences have been shared in the literature to better shape its meaning. This article discusses novel possibilities of these participatory practices through the critical analysis of a concrete community-based project. We here embrace under the “Social” tag of Citizen Social Science both Computational Social Science methodologies and the Social concerns expressed by the mental health community. The interpretation place persons with a mental condition, as well as caregivers and relatives, at the center of the research cycle by taking the role of Competent Experts In-The-Field. A synergetic relation between Citizen Science, Mental Health research and Computational Social Science also imply a conceptual shift in comparison to standard approaches such as the inclusion of research subjects as active co-designers or the consideration of communitarian spaces as most natural experimental spaces. We here describe how these concepts are put into practice during the whole duration of a research project that has studied the social interactions inside the Community Mental Health Care ecosystem. Important steps entail the creation of a Knowledge Coalition, including a diversity of relevant actors with diverse knowledge and expertise, that is later involved in co-designing the research and in embedding experimental settings in communitarian spaces. The experience allows us to open a wider discussion on the possibilities and limitations of Citizen Social Science practices. Having in mind the ethical debate raised by Citizen Science Public Health and Patients’ driven research, we propose a set of values and practices to be agreed on. We also analyse the participation of the scientists in these kind of projects, which forces them to adopt the role of “camaleons” when executing diverse and versatile tasks. We additionally advocate for a more extended collective interpretation of the results in order to produce socially robust knowledge and enhance actions and policies grounded on these results. Exemplified with the experience herein presented, a more horizontal process that include the enhancement of participation and the revision of the notion of experiment offer new opportunities for Social Sciences from a multidisciplinary perspective.


2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (4_Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7011505136p1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tajhma Burroughs ◽  
Kathleen Mathieson ◽  
Catherine V. Belden ◽  
Margo Gross

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
Peter Roy-Byrne ◽  
Robert S. Pynoos ◽  
Ira D. Glick

In response to the changing role of the hospital in the mental health care system, the authors propose a new model for inpatient psychiatric units — that of consultants to outpatient therapists and community and mental health agencies. They discuss key aspects of an inpatient hospitalization that facilitate the tasks of expanded diagnostic evaluation and treatment assessment, and present several cases to illustrate how information and perspectives gleaned from the evaluation can be effectively conveyed to both patient and outpatient therapist, so that it optimizes care of the patient after discharge.


1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard L. Miller ◽  
Stanley L. Brodsky ◽  
John F. Bleechmore

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document