scholarly journals Surface Roughness And Colour Stability Of Dental Porcelain Treated With Different Polishing Methods

Author(s):  
Awang RA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lateef Essa Alwan Al-Jourani ◽  
Sabah Sahib Al-Habeeb ◽  
Ola Mohammed Abdullah

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 360-369
Author(s):  
Hideaki Shiono ◽  
Kou Fujii ◽  
Fumihide Watanabe ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kakehashi ◽  
Yukio Kaneko ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jin ◽  
H. Nikawa ◽  
S. Makihira ◽  
T. Hamada ◽  
M. Furukawa ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 755-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Nagpal ◽  
Gaurav Issar

ABSTRACT Introduction In an attempt to minimize wear damage to the enamel of antagonist teeth, new low and medium fusing ceramic materials have been developed. Manufacturers usually claim that these ceramics are wear-friendly because of their lower hardness, lower concentrations of crystal phase, and smaller crystal sizes. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze the wear strength of various commercially available dental porcelain with tooth enamel as well as the surface hardness of these dental porcelain. Materials and methods The basic model was designed as a pin on plate arrangement. The tooth specimens were mounted on the stylus which was centered on the ceramic specimen in a wear testing machine. The dental ceramic specimen was centered in the metal die. A load of 40 N was applied at a rate of 80 cycles/minute for 15 minutes. In the current study, mean wear depth (Ra) value, volumetric loss, and surface hardness were obtained by standard quantification method and were statistically evaluated. Results Ceramco-3 was reported to be most abrasive for enamel; however, Duceram love significantly more abraded itself than the other two, Ceramco-3 and Vita Alpha, and generated the lowest loss of enamel. Also, same abrasive type of wear was revealed for all three variants of tested ceramics. Conclusion Ceramco-3 was the most abrasive for enamel, while surface roughness (mean wear depth) of Duceram love was maximum and for Ceramco-3 it was minimum. The value of surface roughness for Vita Alpha was in between Duceram love and Ceramco-3. Nonetheless, the mean surface hardness of Duceram love was found to be least and maximum for Vita Alpha. Clinical significance In situations of dental wear and wasting tooth disease (Attrition/Abrasion), Duceram can be applied in lieu of Ceramco-3 so as to prevent worsening of existing dentition. However, in younger patients Vita Alpha would offer maximum durability due to its greater surface hardness. How to cite this article Singh A, Nagpal A, Pawah S, Pathak C, Issar G, Sharma P. Qualitative Assessment of Wear Resistance and Surface Hardness of Different Commercially Available Dental Porcelain: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17(9):755-761.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document