scholarly journals Constitucionalismo cosmopolita = Cosmopolitan constitutionalism

Author(s):  
Constanza Núñez Donald

 Resumen: El presente artículo tiene por objetivo caracterizar al constitucionalismo cosmopolita como un discurso específico dentro del lenguaje constitucionalista en la esfera internacional y, a la vez, destacar sus principales rasgos como proyecto normativo transformador. Para ello se realiza una reconstrucción de sus fundamentos y se desarrollan sus elementos definitorios.Palabras clave: Constitucionalismo cosmopolita, filosofía del Derecho Internacional, constitucionalismo internacional.Abstract: The article has an objective to characterize cosmopolitan constitutionalism as a specific discourse in the international scenario within constitutional approaches and, at the same time, to highlight its principal features as a transformative and normative project. It is made through a reconstruction of its foundations and by typifying its defining elements. Keywords: Cosmopolitan constitutionalism; international legal philosophy; international constitutionalism.   

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Sergio Schmitz Filho ◽  
Cláudio Brandão
Keyword(s):  

O artigo procura identificar o papel de Tobias Barreto no desenvolvimento de uma filosofia jurídica originalmente brasileira, em meados do século XIX. Barreto, como mostram os estudos que serviram de base para o presente estudo, pode ser apontado como um dos maiores responsáveis pelo despertar filosófico de uma sociedade periférica, ainda muito ligada às ideias dos antigos tempos imperial e colonial.


Author(s):  
Dan Jerker B. Svantesson

This chapter takes us into the domain of legal theory and legal philosophy as it places the questions of Internet jurisdiction in a broader theoretical, and indeed philosophical, context. Indeed, it goes as far as to (1) present a definition of what is law, (2) discuss what are the law’s tools, and (3) to describe the roles of law. In addition, it provides distinctions important for how we understand the role of jurisdictional rules both in private international law and in public international law as traditionally defined. Furthermore, it adds law reform tools by introducing and discussing the concept of ‘market sovereignty’ based on ‘market destroying measures’––an important concept for solving the Internet jurisdiction puzzle.


Author(s):  
Marek Jakubiec

AbstractAlthough much ink has been spilled on different aspects of legal concepts, the approach based on the developments of cognitive science is a still neglected area of study. The “mental” and cognitive aspect of these concepts, i.e., their features as mental constructs and cognitive tools, especially in the light of the developments of the cognitive sciences, is discussed quite rarely. The argument made by this paper is that legal concepts are best understood as mental representations. The piece explains what mental representations are and why this view matters. The explanation of legal concepts, understood as mental representations is one of (at least) three levels of explanation within legal philosophy, but—as will be argued—it is the most fundamental level. This paper analyzes the consequences of such understanding of concepts used in the field of legal philosophy. Special emphasis is put on the current debate on the analogical or amodal nature of concepts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document