TOBIAS BARRETO, A ESCOLA DO RECIFE E O PIONEIRISMO NA ELABORAÇÃO DE UMA FILOSOFIA JURÍDICA BRASILEIRATOBIAS BARRETO, THE SCHOOL OF RECIFE AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ORIGINAL BRAZILIAN LEGAL PHILOSOPHY

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Sergio Schmitz Filho ◽  
Cláudio Brandão
Keyword(s):  

O artigo procura identificar o papel de Tobias Barreto no desenvolvimento de uma filosofia jurídica originalmente brasileira, em meados do século XIX. Barreto, como mostram os estudos que serviram de base para o presente estudo, pode ser apontado como um dos maiores responsáveis pelo despertar filosófico de uma sociedade periférica, ainda muito ligada às ideias dos antigos tempos imperial e colonial.

Author(s):  
Dan Jerker B. Svantesson

This chapter takes us into the domain of legal theory and legal philosophy as it places the questions of Internet jurisdiction in a broader theoretical, and indeed philosophical, context. Indeed, it goes as far as to (1) present a definition of what is law, (2) discuss what are the law’s tools, and (3) to describe the roles of law. In addition, it provides distinctions important for how we understand the role of jurisdictional rules both in private international law and in public international law as traditionally defined. Furthermore, it adds law reform tools by introducing and discussing the concept of ‘market sovereignty’ based on ‘market destroying measures’––an important concept for solving the Internet jurisdiction puzzle.


Author(s):  
Marek Jakubiec

AbstractAlthough much ink has been spilled on different aspects of legal concepts, the approach based on the developments of cognitive science is a still neglected area of study. The “mental” and cognitive aspect of these concepts, i.e., their features as mental constructs and cognitive tools, especially in the light of the developments of the cognitive sciences, is discussed quite rarely. The argument made by this paper is that legal concepts are best understood as mental representations. The piece explains what mental representations are and why this view matters. The explanation of legal concepts, understood as mental representations is one of (at least) three levels of explanation within legal philosophy, but—as will be argued—it is the most fundamental level. This paper analyzes the consequences of such understanding of concepts used in the field of legal philosophy. Special emphasis is put on the current debate on the analogical or amodal nature of concepts.


Kant Yearbook ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-56
Author(s):  
Dustin Garlitz

AbstractThis article presents Durkheim as a Neo-Kantian social thinker and a source of the theory of emotional contagion. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life is examined as Durkheim’s paradigm case of Neo-Kantianism. He is first considered among the intellectual context of French Neo-Kantianism and its figures Charles Renouvier, Émile Boutroux, and Octave Hamelin, all whom were influential in his formative years. Durkheim’s Neo-Kantianism in The Elementary Forms of Religious Life is then juxtaposed to the Neo-Kantian legal philosophy of Emil Lask and Hans Kelsen. Agued is that Durkheim’s notions of distortion and emotional contagion are his leading contributions to Neo-Kantianism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document