scholarly journals Reflecting on mathematics teaching situations: A comparison of pre-service mathematics teachers’ and mathematics teacher educators’ views

Author(s):  
Miriam Liston
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Emily Elrod ◽  
Heather West ◽  
Karen F. Hollebrands, ◽  
Valerie Faulkner

The Mathematics Teacher Educator journal is co-sponsored by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. In June, both organizations released statements that call for mathematics teachers and mathematics teacher educators (MTEs) to “engage in anti-racist and trauma-informed education in our daily practices as processes of learning and adjustments” (NCTM, 2020) and to “actively work to be anti-racist in our acts of teaching, research, and service” (AMTE, 2020). This editorial highlights equity-related interventions and tools that can be implemented by MTEs. We reiterate statements made by NCTM and AMTE, describe key features of interventions and tools, and share equity-related resources published in the journal for MTEs to use with teachers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-74
Author(s):  
Rochelle Gutiérrez

We are in an interesting historical moment in mathematics teacher education. On the one and, there is greater realization within our field of the connections between systems of power and mathematics (O'Neil, 2016). We are starting to acknowledge how mathematics education can be viewed as dehumanizing for both students and teachers as well as what might constitute rehumanizing practices (Gutiérrez, in press). Our professional organizations are calling for teachers to move beyond simplistic notions of equity to understand these power dimensions and challenge the system on behalf of (and in community with) Black,1 Indigenous,2 and Latinx3 students in particular


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-56
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Roller

Teachers and mathematics teacher education scholars have identified field experiences and quality mentoring as influential components of math teacher preparation and development. Yet, quality mentoring is a complex and demanding practice. Providing educative feedback to novices, particularly that which encourages reflection versus evaluation, can be challenging work for mentors. To study the potential of an intervention for providing professional development for mentors, I worked with pairs of mentors and prospective teachers (PSTs) offering Smith's (2009) noticing and wondering language as a way of structuring mentoring conversations that maintain both descriptive and interpretive analytic stances. Analysis of before and after conversations provided evidence of how mentor-PST pairs adopted noticing and wondering language, and in particular illuminated the ways in which the language structure might support interpretive mentoring conversations for studying teaching. The results suggest that mathematics teacher educators may want to consider what makes wondering challenging work and how to best support wondering in educative mentoring conversations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-183
Author(s):  
Tonya Bartell ◽  
Courtney Koestler ◽  
Mary Q. Foote

The Access, Allies, and Agency in Mathematical Systems project team designed a professional development for mathematics teachers positioning equity at the systemic level and activities aimed at supporting mathematics teachers in considering the influence of privilege and oppression on mathematics teaching and learning (Scroggins, 2017). Here, we examine the levels of oppression activity, aimed at supporting mathematics teachers in understanding that oppression operates at multiple levels (i.e., as a system) and that these levels exist and operate in/on mathematics education. Such understanding can support mathematics teachers in disrupting inequities, and how mathematics teachers engage in this activity can support mathematics teacher educators in preparing teachers to do such work. Specifically, we explore the question: How does this activity support mathematics teachers’ understanding of levels of oppression?


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 954-971
Author(s):  
Scott A. Courtney ◽  
Joanne Caniglia

In the U.S., state adopted or developed college- and career-ready mathematics standards, including the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, not only impact districts, students, and their teachers, but also university teacher preparation programs. In order to attain and sustain Common Core’s vision of developing mathematically competent citizens, teacher preparation programs must support pre-service teachers’ development of practical conceptions of the Standards for Mathematical Practice. In this article, we examine the mathematical practices middle grades pre-service teachers (grades 4-9 licensure) and mathematics teacher educators identified as playing a role in attempts to make sense of and work toward solutions to mathematics problems. In addition, we compare the mathematical practices indicated both within and across pre-service teachers and mathematics teacher educators. Results identify pre-service teachers’ potential difficulties operationalizing six specific mathematical habits of mind. Finally, we describe how such comparisons can guide the design of future teacher education and professional learning by describing a process for identifying problems and tasks with the greatest potential to support pre-service teachers’ development of practical conceptions of mathematics or other content-specific habits of mind.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-210
Author(s):  
Marieli Vanessa Rediske de Almeida ◽  
Miguel Ribeiro ◽  
Dario Fiorentini

The knowledge of Mathematics teachers has been a very prominent focus of attention in the last decades. However, it leaves aside one of the dimensions involved in the development of this type of knowledge, specifically the knowledge of Mathematics teacher educators. In this paper, we discuss a mathematics teacher educator’s knowledge in the context of classes on Euclid’s division algorithm theorem in a Number Theory course for prospective secondary teachers. Some indicators of this specialized knowledge of mathematics teacher educators are presented and discussed.


1970 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Hari Prasad Koirala

There is still a shortage of qualified mathematics teachers in schools in developed and developing countries. It may be because of the problems facing mathematics teachers in schools and the problems facing mathematics teacher-educators in colleges of education who are responsible in producing qualified mathematics teachers. Mathematics teachers and educators are more concerned about the former and the latter is usually neglected. This article tries to trace out the problems facing mathematics teacher-educators in both developing and developed countries on the basis of a study carried out in Nepal and a similar study in England. 15 out of 16 and 135 out of 247 mathematical educators in Nepal and England respectively took part in these studies. It was found that lack of books and journals, teaching facilities and aids and negligible grants for research or personal studies are the main problems for mathematics teacher-educators both in Nepal and England. However it was seen that the problems faced by mathematical educators in Nepal were more serious than those of England.Key words: Mathematics teacher; Developing and Developed countries; Nepal and EnglandTribhuvan University JournalVolume XIV, 1991Page: 15-25Uploaded date: 5 October, 2010


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document