The Evolution of Academic Journal Publishing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haven Allahar
2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 141-153
Author(s):  
Peter Binfield ◽  
Zachary Rolnik ◽  
Cindy Brown ◽  
Kerry Cole

Author(s):  
Julian McDougall

This article shares experiences from editing an academic journal publishing media practice research, supervising and assessing doctoral media practice research and reviewing media practice research (including elements of my own work) against prescribed external standards for originality, significance and rigour. It offers a set of principles, drawn from the field, for doctoral practice researchers and supervisors, postdoctoral practice researchers thinking about how to present their research for external review and more experienced researchers thinking about practice as a way of moving beyond disciplinary constraints. The article makes suggestions with regard to a) how practice research can best be “signposted” as such; b) how the media practice research community are establishing criteria for this work we do that should be shared and used collegiately from this point, and c) how to talk about the tensions between media practice research as a political project and the desire for legitimation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-30
Author(s):  
Douglas M. Boyle ◽  
James F. Boyle ◽  
Dana R. Hermanson

ABSTRACT The three of us devote a significant portion of our research time to publishing in peer-reviewed practitioner accounting journals, in addition to our focus on traditional academic journal publishing. In this article, we first discuss overall considerations when publishing for practitioners, including finding topics, writing, statistics, and implications. Then, we describe the five types of practitioner papers we typically produce and how we develop each type of paper: small literature reviews, empirical papers, thought pieces, skills papers, and current topic updates. We conclude with discussion of related educational opportunities and issues, including using practitioner articles in class, exposing doctoral students to practitioner publishing, and getting academic credit for practitioner publishing in tenure, promotion, and annual performance reviews. At a time when accounting academia is seeking to enhance the relevance and impact of research, we hope this paper will prompt other academics to begin or increase their contributions to practitioner journals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document