scholarly journals Big-M-Small-N Temporal-Order Judgment Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-373
Author(s):  
Jan T{"{u}}nnermann ◽  
Ingrid Scharlau
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Small N ◽  
Judgment Data

scholarly journals Big-M-Small-N Temporal-Order Judgment Data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Tünnermann ◽  
Ingrid Scharlau
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Covert Attention ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Model Comparisons ◽  
Precise Data ◽  
Important Concern ◽  
Small N ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments ◽  
Judgment Data

We present a large and precise data set of temporal-order judgments on visual stimuli.Stimulus asynchronies ranged from 0 to 80 ms in steps of 6.67 ms. The data setincludes an attention manipulation driven by one target’s orientation compared tobackground elements (either zero or 90 degrees). Each of 25 stimulus asynchronies wassampled with at least 196 repetitions (and more than 400 times in two participants).Furthermore, fixation, an important concern in studies on covert attention, wasmonitored. Precise data are helpful for answering theoretical questions in psychology.For some questions such as model comparisons, they may even be necessary. Threedifferent exemplary models are fitted to the data.

Time changes: Temporal contexts support event segmentation in associative memory

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent van de Ven ◽  
Moritz Jaeckels ◽  
Peter De Weerd
Keyword(s):  
Associative Memory ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Temporal Context ◽  
Temporal Acuity ◽  
Event Segmentation ◽  
Standard Interval ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Time Changes ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

We tend to mentally segment a series of events according to perceptual contextual changes, such that items from a shared context are more strongly associated in memory than items from different contexts. It is also known that temporal context provides a scaffold to structure experiences in memory, but its role in event segmentation has not been investigated. We adapted a previous paradigm, which was used to investigate event segmentation using visual contexts, to study the effects of changes in temporal contexts on event segmentation in associative memory. We presented lists of items in which the inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) ranged across lists between 0.5 and 4 s in 0.5 s steps. After each set of six lists, participants judged which one of two test items were shown first (temporal order judgment) for items that were either drawn from the same list or from consecutive lists. Further, participants judged from memory whether the ISI associated to an item lasted longer than a standard interval (2.25s) that was not previously shown. Results showed faster responses for temporal order judgments when items were drawn from the same context, as opposed to items drawn from different contexts. Further, we found that participants were well able to provide temporal duration judgments based on recalled durations. Finally, we found temporal acuity, as estimated by psychometric curve fitting parameters of the recalled durations, correlated inversely with within-list temporal order judgments. These findings show that changes in temporal context support event segmentation in associative memory.

scholarly journals Temporal order judgment of auditory stimulus offset

1983 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Pastore
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Stimulus ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Stimulus Offset

scholarly journals Temporal order judgment and simple reaction times: Evidence for a common processing system

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Cardoso-Leite ◽  
Andrei Gorea ◽  
Pascal Mamassian
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Processing System ◽  
Simple Reaction

Visual Simultaneity Judgments Activate a Bilateral Frontoparietal Timing System

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor Hanayik ◽  
Grigori Yourganov ◽  
Roger Newman-Norlund ◽  
Makayla Gibson ◽  
Chris Rorden
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Processing ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Inferior Frontal Gyrus ◽  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Cognitive Networks ◽  
Temporal Perception ◽  
Sequence Of Events

In everyday life, we often make judgments regarding the sequence of events, for example, deciding whether a baseball runner's foot hit the plate before or after the ball hit the glove. Numerous studies have examined the functional correlates of temporal processing using variations of the temporal order judgment and simultaneity judgment (SJ) tasks. To perform temporal order judgment tasks, observers must bind temporal information with identity and/or spatial information relevant to the task itself. SJs, on the other hand, require observers to detect stimulus asynchrony but not the order of stimulus presentation and represent a purer measure of temporal processing. Some previous studies suggest that these temporal decisions rely primarily on right-hemisphere parietal structures, whereas others provide evidence that temporal perception depends on bilateral TPJ or inferior frontal regions (inferior frontal gyrus). Here, we report brain activity elicited by a visual SJ task. Our methods are unique given our use of two orthogonal control conditions, discrimination of spatial orientation and color, which were used to control for brain activation associated with the classic dorsal (“where/how”) and ventral (“what”) visual pathways. Our neuroimaging experiment shows that performing the SJ task selectively activated a bilateral network in the parietal (TPJ) and frontal (inferior frontal gyrus) cortices. We argue that SJ tasks are a purer measure of temporal perception because they do not require observers to process either identity or spatial information, both of which may activate separate cognitive networks.

scholarly journals Spatial and Spectral Auditory Temporal-Order Judgment (TOJ) Tasks in Elderly People Are Performed Using Different Perceptual Strategies

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elzbieta Szelag ◽  
Katarzyna Jablonska ◽  
Magdalena Piotrowska ◽  
Aneta Szymaszek ◽  
Hanna Bednarek
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document