Lung sliding

ASVIDE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Joseph Thachuthara-George
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 6976
Author(s):  
Miroslav Jaščur ◽  
Marek Bundzel ◽  
Marek Malík ◽  
Anton Dzian ◽  
Norbert Ferenčík ◽  
...  

Certain post-thoracic surgery complications are monitored in a standard manner using methods that employ ionising radiation. A need to automatise the diagnostic procedure has now arisen following the clinical trial of a novel lung ultrasound examination procedure that can replace X-rays. Deep learning was used as a powerful tool for lung ultrasound analysis. We present a novel deep-learning method, automated M-mode classification, to detect the absence of lung sliding motion in lung ultrasound. Automated M-mode classification leverages semantic segmentation to select 2D slices across the temporal dimension of the video recording. These 2D slices are the input for a convolutional neural network, and the output of the neural network indicates the presence or absence of lung sliding in the given time slot. We aggregate the partial predictions over the entire video recording to determine whether the subject has developed post-surgery complications. With a 64-frame version of this architecture, we detected lung sliding on average with a balanced accuracy of 89%, sensitivity of 82%, and specificity of 92%. Automated M-mode classification is suitable for lung sliding detection from clinical lung ultrasound videos. Furthermore, in lung ultrasound videos, we recommend using time windows between 0.53 and 2.13 s for the classification of lung sliding motion followed by aggregation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Duclos ◽  
Laurent Muller ◽  
Marc Leone ◽  
Laurent Zieleskiewicz

Critical Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Piette ◽  
R Daoust ◽  
J Lambert ◽  
A Denault
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 2681-2687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Avila ◽  
Ben Smith ◽  
Therese Mead ◽  
Duane Jurma ◽  
Matthew Dawson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Critical Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Daoust ◽  
E Piette ◽  
J Lambert ◽  
A Denault

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. E1079-E1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Shokoohi ◽  
Keith Boniface

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 472
Author(s):  
Umit Kaldirim ◽  
Salim Kemal Tuncer ◽  
Yusuf Emrah Eyi ◽  
Yakup Aksoy

2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 81-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Dori ◽  
Daniel J. Jakobson

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Bianca Emilia Ciurba ◽  
Hédi Katalin Sárközi ◽  
István Adorján Szabó ◽  
Nimród László ◽  
Edith Simona Ianosi ◽  
...  

Abstract Over the last decades, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic period, lung ultrasound (LUS) gained interest due to multiple advantages: radiation-free, repeatable, cost-effective, portable devices with a bedside approach. These advantages can help clinicians in triage, in positive diagnostic, stratification of disease forms according to severity and prognosis, evaluation of mechanically ventilated patients from Intensive Care Units, as well as monitoring the progress of COVID-19 lesions, thus reducing the health care contamination. LUS should be performed by standard protocol examination. The characteristic lesions from COVID-19 pneumonia are the abolished lung sliding, presence of multiple and coalescent B-lines, disruption and thickening of pleural line with subpleural consolidations. LUS is a useful method for post-COVID-19 lesions evaluation, highlight the remaining fibrotic lesions in some patients with moderate or severe forms of pneumonia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document