scholarly journals Comparison of albumin-bilirubin grade versus Child-Pugh score in predicting the outcome of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using time-dependent ROC

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 538-538
Author(s):  
Shoujie Zhao ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Huichen Li ◽  
Mengmeng Wang ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Lei Liu ◽  
Enxin Wang ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Dongyu Chen ◽  
Kun Peng ◽  
...  

Background. Combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib (TACE-S) has been proven to be safe and effective for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, this combination therapy is associated with a high incidence of adverse events (AEs). Our study focused on the relationships between AEs and treatment outcomes and aimed to discover AE-based clinical markers that can predict the survival benefits of combination treatment. Methods. From January 2010 to June 2014, a total of 235 HCC patients treated with TACE-S were retrospectively enrolled. Major sorafenib-related AEs were prospectively recorded, and their correlations with overall survival (OS) were analysed using time-dependent covariate Cox regression analyses. Results. The majority of the patients (200, 85.1%) were male, and the median age was 51 years old. After two years of follow-up, the median OS of the study population reached 12.4 months. In all, 218 patients (92.8%) presented at least one AE, and 174 (74.0%) suffered AEs ≥2 grade. Based on time-dependent multivariate analyses, the development of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) ≥2 grade (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.32–0.58, P<0.001) and diarrhoea ≥1 grade (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53–0.97, P=0.029) were identified as independent predictors of prolonged OS. Moreover, patients who developed both HFSR ≥2 grade and diarrhoea ≥1 grade achieved better outcomes than those patients who developed either or neither of these AEs (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.11–2.06, P=0.009). Conclusions. The development of HFSR ≥2 grade or diarrhoea ≥1 grade during TACE-S treatment indicated prolonged OS, and these AEs should be considered important clinical markers for predicting patient prognoses.


Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinhong Jung ◽  
Ji Hyeon Joo ◽  
So Yeon Kim ◽  
Jin Hyoung Kim ◽  
Jonggi Choi ◽  
...  

Introduction: We evaluated the radiologic response rate of combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiotherapy (RT) in treatment-naïve patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) and analyzed its clinical importance in overall survival (OS) outcomes. Methods: Patients who were treated with TACE plus RT as a first-line treatment for HCC with MVI between January 2010 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiologic response was assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 2- and 4-months after completion of RT. Landmark analysis at 2- and 4-months and time-dependent Cox regression analysis using response as a time-dependent covariate were performed for univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: The 2-month landmark analysis included 427 patients, and the 4-month landmark analysis included 355 patients after excluding patients without imaging studies for response evaluation at 4 months. Radiologic responses were observed in 210 (49.2%) patients at 2 months and 181 (51.8%) at 4 months. In multivariable analyses, radiologic response was identified as an independent prognosticator for OS at 2 months (median OS: responders, 23.1 months vs. non-responders, 8.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 3.194; P < 0.001) and 4 months (median OS: responders, 26.5 months vs. non-responders, 9.3 months; HR, 4.534; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Radiologic response assessed by mRECIST was a significant prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced-stage HCC showing MVI treated with combined TACE plus RT.


1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1220
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Kim ◽  
Joon Koo Han ◽  
Jin Wook Chung ◽  
Jae Hyung Park ◽  
Man Chung Han

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Hoon Kim ◽  
Young-Hwa Chung ◽  
Soo Hyun Yang ◽  
Jeong A Kim ◽  
Myoung Kuk Jang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document