scholarly journals Effect of small body habitus on peri-operative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy: retrospective analysis of 208 consecutive cases

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1245-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank O. Velez-Cubian ◽  
Wei-Wei Zhang ◽  
Kathryn L. Rodriguez ◽  
Matthew R. Thau ◽  
Emily P. Ng ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn S. Kass ◽  
Frank O. Velez-Cubian ◽  
Wei Wei Zhang ◽  
Kavian Toosi ◽  
Tawee Tanvetyanon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 662
Author(s):  
Kim Huber ◽  
Bernhard Christen ◽  
Sarah Calliess ◽  
Tilman Calliess

Introduction: Image-based robotic assistance appears to be a promising tool for individualizing alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The patient-specific model of the knee enables a preoperative 3D planning of component position. Adjustments to the individual soft-tissue situation can be done intraoperatively. Based on this, we have established a standardized workflow to implement the idea of kinematic alignment (KA) for robotic-assisted TKA. In addition, we have defined limits for its use. If these limits are reached, we switch to a restricted KA (rKA). The aim of the study was to evaluate (1) in what percentage of patients a true KA or an rKA is applicable, (2) whether there were differences regarding knee phenotypes, and (3) what the differences of philosophies in terms of component position, joint stability, and early patient outcome were. Methods: The study included a retrospective analysis of 111 robotic-assisted primary TKAs. Based on preoperative long leg standing radiographs, the patients were categorized into a varus, valgus, or neutral subgroup. Initially, all patients were planned for KA TKA. When the defined safe zone had been exceeded, adjustments to an rKA were made. Intraoperatively, the alignment of the components and joint gaps were recorded by robotic software. Results and conclusion: With our indication for TKA and the defined boundaries, “only” 44% of the patients were suitable for a true KA with no adjustments or soft tissue releases. In the varus group, it was about 70%, whereas it was 0% in the valgus group and 25% in the neutral alignment group. Thus, significant differences with regard to knee morphotypes were evident. In the KA group, a more physiological knee balance reconstructing the trapezoidal flexion gap (+2 mm on average laterally) was seen as well as a closer reconstruction of the surface anatomy and joint line in all dimensions compared to rKA. This resulted in a higher improvement in the collected outcome scores in favor of KA in the very early postoperative phase.


Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 166 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-217
Author(s):  
Pavit S. Deol ◽  
Joseph Sipko ◽  
Ambuj Kumar ◽  
Athanasios Tsalatsanis ◽  
Carla C. Moodie ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. ii21
Author(s):  
S. Reynolds ◽  
J. Glover ◽  
M. Echavarria ◽  
E. Ng ◽  
F. Velez-Cubian ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document