scholarly journals Quality of life after laparoscopic resection of hepatic hemangioma

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Victor Lopez-Lopez ◽  
Juan Jose Ruiz Manzanera ◽  
Asunción Lopez-Conesa ◽  
Roberto Brusadin ◽  
Ricardo Robles Campos
2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (11-12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Vujanović ◽  
Martina Ribič-Pucelj ◽  
Franc Jelenc

Background: Te purpose of the study was to determine the quality of life in patients with bowel endometriosis before and afer laparoscopic bowel resection.Material and methods: In the retrospective study we included 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of the bowel affected by endometriosis at the Unit for Reproduction and the Unit for Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ljubljana, in the period from 2002 to 2011. Te study was retrospective. Te patients were sent a questionnaire regarding the symptoms before surgery and the effect of surgery on bowel symptoms, painful menstruation, painful sexual intercourse, chronic pelvic pain and quality of life before and afer surgery; 76 (83.5 %) patients replied to the questionnaire.Results: Before surgery, 72 (94.7 %) patients reported painful menstruation. Improvement or complete relief afer surgery was registered in 57 (79.1 %). Out of 60 (78.9 %) patients who had painful sexual intercourse before surgery, 49 (81.7 %) reported improvement or complete relief afer surgery. Bowel symptoms, present in 52 (68.4 %) patients before surgery, improved or completely disappeared in 48 (92.4 %) afer surgery. Chronic pelvic pain, present in 53 (69.7 %) before surgery, decreased or did not exist any more in 45 patients (86.5 %). Te quality of life before surgery was very poor in 32 patients (42.1 %), and poor in 21 patients (27.8 %). Afer the operation, the quality of life was reported as improved in 22 (28.9 %) and signifcantly improved in 42 (55.3 %).Conclusions: Laparoscopic bowel resection, indicated in extensive symptomatic endometriosis, signifcantly improves the patients’ quality of life.


Surgery Today ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 917-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Rong Chen ◽  
Yong-Qiang Xu ◽  
Xiao-Chen Wang ◽  
Shu Zheng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adisa Poljo ◽  
Bettina Klugsberger ◽  
Günther Klimbacher ◽  
Wolfgang Schimetta ◽  
Andreas Shamiyeh

Abstract Purpose Laparoscopic resection rectopexy (LRR) is an established procedure for the treatment of rectal prolapse. This study evaluated constipation and gastrointestinal quality of life in patients before and after LRR for rectal prolapse. Methods 30 patients (24 females, 6 males) underwent laparoscopic anterior (n = 14), posterior (n = 8) and suture resection rectopexy (n = 8) for rectal prolapse during 2010–2020. 25 were retrospectively evaluated for constipation and gastrointestinal quality of life using validated Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Results Constipation score was significantly reduced from median 16.0 ± 6.4 to 6.0 ± 4.7 after 68.0 ± 42.8 months (p < 0.001). Constipation was improved in 20 patients (80.0%), unaltered in 2 patients and worse in 3 patients. Prior abdominal surgeries were associated with less improvement for constipation (p < 0,05). Significant improvement in GIQLI score was observed, with median total GIQLI score increasing from 95.0 ± 14.8 to 124.0 ± 18.2 (p < 0.001). Quality of life improved in 21 patients (84.0%). Positive changes were also observed in GIQLI subgroups of gastrointestinal symptoms, emotions, physical status, social dysfunction and effects of medical treatment (p < 0.001). There was no difference in outcome between the three procedures. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse is safe, feasible, and very effective regarding both perioperative results and long-term functional outcome. Our results suggest that LRR significantly improves constipation in patients with outlet obstruction and clearly contributes to a higher quality of life.


Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. e14485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinqin Liu ◽  
Fei Liu ◽  
Jingjing Ding ◽  
Yonggang Wei ◽  
Bo Li

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Kim ◽  
Joachim Reibetanz ◽  
Lars Boenicke ◽  
Christoph-Thomas Germer ◽  
David Jayne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document