scholarly journals AB167. The appropriate use of plain film abdomen in the acute surgical assessment unit: the experience of a model three Irish hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. AB167-AB167
Author(s):  
Thomas Hefferon ◽  
Natasha Khullar ◽  
Rena Al-Zubaidy ◽  
Frederik Pretorius
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Hefferon ◽  
N Khullar ◽  
R AL-Zubaidy ◽  
F Pretorius

Abstract Introduction A plain film abdomen (PFA) is a useful modality of imaging if used correctly. However, when used inappropriately, it leads to unnecessary cost and increases patients’ exposure to radiation. The aim of this study is to assess the adherence to the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines for PFA use in acute surgical patients. Method A retrospective study was conducted in the Acute Surgical Assessment Unit (ASAU) of a Model 3 Irish Hospital over a 12-day period in October 2019. Data was obtained using a Patient Census Book and the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS). Recorded indications for the PFAs were compared against RCR guidelines. Results A total of 207 patients were reviewed, 113 males and 94 females, with a median age of 45. In 67 out of 207 patients (31.4%) a PFA was performed. A total of 31 (46.3%) were valid indications. A significant finding was present in 6 of the PFAs none related to the presenting complaint. Discussion Based on RCR guidelines regarding the indications for PFA, >50% of the patients had a PFA for reasons not indicated by their presenting complaint. If implemented properly, adherence to guidelines could save cost and more importantly, safeguard our patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (1110) ◽  
pp. 204-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Gillen ◽  
Sue Faye Sharifuddin ◽  
Muireann O’Sullivan ◽  
Alison Gordon ◽  
Eva M Doherty

BackgroundThis explorative study was triggered by the ‘#hellomynameis’ campaign initiated by Dr Kate Granger in the UK. Our objectives were twofold: first, to measure rates of introduction in an Irish hospital setting by both consultant and non-consultant hospital doctors. Second to establish whether such practices were associated with patient perceptions of the doctor/patient interaction.MethodA patient ‘exit’ survey was undertaken following doctor–patient consultations in both acute (surgical and medical assessment units) and elective settings (outpatient clinics). The survey was carried out over a 5-month period by three trained clinical observers.ResultsA total of 353 patients were surveyed. There were 253 outpatients and 100 inpatients surveyed. There were 121 outpatients (47.8%) who attended a surgeon, 73 were medical (28.8%), while 59 (23.3%) were divided between obstetrics, gynaecology and ophthalmology. One hundred acute presentations were surveyed: 52% in the emergency department, 20% to the acute medical assessment unit, 21% attended the acute surgical assessment unit and 7% attended other specialties/departments.ConclusionAccording to the returned forms, 79% of doctors (n=279) introduced themselves to patients. Eleven per cent (39) of doctors did not introduce themselves, and 8.5% of patients (30) were unsure whether the doctor had introduced themselves. Five patients left their response blank.Consultants were significantly more likely (P=0.02) to introduce themselves or shake hands than non-consultant hospital doctors. Gender had no bearing (P=0.43) on introductions or handshakes regardless of grade of doctor.Three hundred and seventeen patients (89.7%) felt that an introduction had made a positive difference to their healthcare visit. Thirty patients (8.5%) felt it did not make a difference and 8 patients (2.2%) were unsure or failed to answer.This study has highlighted the importance of introductions to patients. Definite evidence of an introduction was documented in 79% of patients with 14.5% either not receiving or could not recall whether an introduction had been made on repeat visits. 6.5% stated that they did not receive an introduction.


2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Leon H. Ensalada

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, is available and includes numerous changes that will affect both evaluators who and systems that use the AMA Guides. The Fifth Edition is nearly twice the size of its predecessor (613 pages vs 339 pages) and contains three additional chapters (the musculoskeletal system now is split into three chapters and the cardiovascular system into two). Table 1 shows how chapters in the Fifth Edition were reorganized from the Fourth Edition. In addition, each of the chapters is presented in a consistent format, as shown in Table 2. This article and subsequent issues of The Guides Newsletter will examine these changes, and the present discussion focuses on major revisions, particularly those in the first two chapters. (See Table 3 for a summary of the revisions to the musculoskeletal and pain chapters.) Chapter 1, Philosophy, Purpose, and Appropriate Use of the AMA Guides, emphasizes objective assessment necessitating a medical evaluation. Most impairment percentages in the Fifth Edition are unchanged from the Fourth because the majority of ratings currently are accepted, there is limited scientific data to support changes, and ratings should not be changed arbitrarily. Chapter 2, Practical Application of the AMA Guides, describes how to use the AMA Guides for consistent and reliable acquisition, analysis, communication, and utilization of medical information through a single set of standards.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Raduma-Tomas ◽  
Rhona Flin ◽  
Steven Yule ◽  
Steven Close

1988 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 615
Author(s):  
G H Chung ◽  
Y H Seo ◽  
S W Sohn ◽  
C S Kim ◽  
K C Choi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1042-1046
Author(s):  
Tadeo Armando Barrón López ◽  

The following text will show the different tax forms for a newly created company to become competitive, analyze the subsidies they have in a federal tax (Income Tax), compare the tax incorporation regime (RIF) with The old regime of small taxpayers (REPECO), analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the appropriate use of RIF for start-ups, and finally, the tax incorporation regime is compared with similar ones in Latin America, reflecting on tax contributions Which each government has to raise so that its governments are efficient and effective within a country.


1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-87
Author(s):  
Salah El-Sheikh

This paper seeks to understand the context in which the debates con­cerning Islamic economics are taking place. The author contends that in the absence of a democratic and free environment the discourses on Islamic economics are suffering from free and open discussions about the true essence of Islam and its implications in the socioeconomic arena. After discussing some of the limits of the discourses on Islamic economics, suc.h as a lack of common terminology and appropriate use of Qur'anic terms, the author advances his understanding of the Qur'anic approach to iman. The author argues that 'aql and hikrrui are the cornerstones of Islam and the two faculties that the Qur'an repeat­edly invokes in order that humanity may understand Islamic laws and principles and fulfill its mandate of Allah's vicegerency. The paper con­cludes that the straight path is essentially a rational approach and invites the discourses on Islamic economics to rely more on 'aql and hikrrui in their contemplation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document