scholarly journals Changing house staff attitudes toward nurse practitioners during their residency training.

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. 1204-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Weinberger ◽  
J Y Greene ◽  
J J Mamlin
1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
Wendy Levinson ◽  
Karen Kaufman ◽  
Patrick M. Dunn

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. S37
Author(s):  
Andrea Totney ◽  
Michelle Grummisch ◽  
Grainne Lowe ◽  
Melanie Price

1982 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Barnes ◽  
P DeSimone ◽  
S Fosson
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry A. McNearney ◽  
Angela J. Shepherd ◽  
Ajoy Chhabra ◽  
Niti Goel

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. e92-e92
Author(s):  
Zheng Jing Hu ◽  
Gerhard Fusch ◽  
Salhab el Helou ◽  
Thabane Lehana ◽  
Teresa Chan ◽  
...  

Abstract Primary Subject area Physician Wellness Background Physician burnout is a psychological phenomenon with serious and pervasive consequences on physicians’ mental health, patient safety, and quality of care. Burnout is multifactorial, originating from systemic issues, organizational culture and individual coping skills. Burnout is more common in residency training. Residents experience burnout more intensely due to lack of autonomy, self-efficacy and exposure to mistreatment. Residents are also frontline workers and the future healthcare givers. Organization-led interventions mostly focus on building resilience and mindfulness without addressing systems-level issues. In our study, we attempted to shift the paradigm to address system-level concerns first. We aimed to adapt Joy-in-Work: a quality improvement framework developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). This program allows residents to identify system problems that are meaningful to them and empower them to work as a team, taking back their autonomy and self-efficacy. Objectives To demonstrate that Joy-in-Work can be adapted effectively into a residency training program to reduce burnout and improve psychological safety among residents. Design/Methods The four steps of Joy-in-Work were implemented for residents in a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit. Residents engaged in “what matters” conversations through survey and group meetings, and identified impediments to Joy-in-Work. By applying QI methodology, residents identified priority interventions to eliminate impediments. Finally, the effectiveness of interventions was evaluated. Primary outcomes included prevalence of burnout and psychological safety; secondary outcomes assessed control over workload, and organizational culture. An IHI 12-item questionnaire was administered at baseline and after the interventions. To assess sustainability, a survey was also conducted one year after the implementation. We assessed adherence to interventions, nurse practitioners’ satisfaction and residents’ workload indicators. Results Through the implementation of Joy-in-Work, residents identified autonomy and work life integration as priorities. Stakeholders developed two interventions: change call schedule according to residents’ preferences and earlier afternoon handover time. Burnout was 77.8%, 50% and 75% for three survey periods respectively. Psychological safety increased consistently from 16.7% to 37.5% to 43.8%. Lack of control over workload dropped sharply from 72.2% to 12.5%, with a rebound to 56.3%. Most secondary outcomes demonstrated a similar pattern of positive change initially with reversion to baseline. Conclusion We demonstrated that Joy-in-Work is successfully adaptable into a residency setting. Implementation through residents’ engagement and empowerment can decrease burnout and improve psychological safety significantly. The process itself was likely the key driver for achieving positive outcomes rather than the actual interventions. Sustainability remains a key issue that requires systems support.


2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rasminsky ◽  
A. Lomonaco ◽  
E. Auchincloss

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-176
Author(s):  
Javier Cabello ◽  
Krishna Das ◽  
William E. Trick ◽  
Mary N. Gerard ◽  
Marjorie Charles-Damte

We surveyed house staff who had participated in a trial that compared influenza vaccination strategies for inpatients. House staff who were exposed to computer-generated vaccination orders were more likely to report that they recommended vaccination to their inpatients and outpatients, compared with house staff who were not exposed to a vaccination intervention. Also, house staff did not recognize regnant women as a high-priority population for influenza vaccination.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-524
Author(s):  
Brent Pollitt

Mental illness is a serious problem in the United States. Based on “current epidemiological estimates, at least one in five people has a diagnosable mental disorder during the course of a year.” Fortunately, many of these disorders respond positively to psychotropic medications. While psychiatrists write some of the prescriptions for psychotropic medications, primary care physicians write more of them. State legislatures, seeking to expand patient access to pharmacological treatment, granted physician assistants and nurse practitioners prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications. Over the past decade other groups have gained some form of prescriptive authority. Currently, psychologists comprise the primary group seeking prescriptive authority for psychotropic medications.The American Society for the Advancement of Pharmacotherapy (“ASAP”), a division of the American Psychological Association (“APA”), spearheads the drive for psychologists to gain prescriptive authority. The American Psychological Association offers five main reasons why legislatures should grant psychologists this privilege: 1) psychologists’ education and clinical training better qualify them to diagnose and treat mental illness in comparison with primary care physicians; 2) the Department of Defense Psychopharmacology Demonstration Project (“PDP”) demonstrated non-physician psychologists can prescribe psychotropic medications safely; 3) the recommended post-doctoral training requirements adequately prepare psychologists to prescribe safely psychotropic medications; 4) this privilege will increase availability of mental healthcare services, especially in rural areas; and 5) this privilege will result in an overall reduction in medical expenses, because patients will visit only one healthcare provider instead of two–one for psychotherapy and one for medication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document