Confidence in Government, Right-wing Authoritarianism, and South Koreans' Attitudes toward Civil Liberties

Peace Studies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-106
Author(s):  
Bomi Lee ◽  
Shang E. Ha
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Fasce ◽  
Diego Avendaño

Civil liberties and rights such as freedom of expression, press, thought, religion, association, lifestyle, and equality against the law are being subjected to fierce controversies within the socio-political landscape of Western developed countries. Based on a literature review, we develop two working hypotheses aimed at explaining divergent attitudes toward civil liberties among politically charged online communities on each side of the political spectrum. First, a “libertarian attitude” among rightist groups, in which economic conservatism suppresses the illiberal tendencies of social conservatism and right-wing authoritarianism. Second, a “illiberal attitude” among leftist groups, elicited by the rise of authoritarian forms of social justice-seeking within some influential left-wing ideologies. We report a correlational study using a cross-sectional sample (n = 902), whose results support both hypotheses. Lastly, we discuss these results in relation to polarization over civil liberties and perceived power imbalances between conservatives and liberals.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Michael Crowson

The purpose of this study was to test an integrative model in which worldview beliefs were treated as antecedents of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO), and two sets of attitudes related to the War on Terror: endorsement of restrictions on human rights/civil liberties and support for the US military invasion of Iraq in 2003. Dangerous and competitive world beliefs significantly predicted RWA and SDO, respectively, during structural equation modeling. Whereas both RWA and SDO predicted endorsement of human rights/civil liberties attitudes, only RWA predicted support for military aggression against Iraq. Tests of indirect effects suggested that RWA mediated the effects of dangerous world beliefs on attitudes toward human rights/civil liberties and support for military aggression, whereas SDO mediated the effects of competitive world beliefs on attitudes toward human rights/civil liberties only.


2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Christopher Cohrs ◽  
Sven Kielmann ◽  
Jurgen Maes ◽  
Barbara Moschner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document