COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR ILIAC CREST BONE GRAFTS IN TERMS OF HARVEST-SITE MORBIDITY AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES

2002 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 716-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELKE AHLMANN ◽  
MICHAEL PATZAKIS ◽  
NIKOLAOS ROIDIS ◽  
LANE SHEPHERD ◽  
PAUL HOLTOM
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward M Reece ◽  
Matthew J Davis ◽  
Ryan D Wagner ◽  
Amjed Abu-Ghname ◽  
Alex Cruz ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Iliac crest autograft has been the gold standard for harvest of fusion materials in spine surgery. The benefits of a vascularized version of this bone graft—including delivery of stem cells, ability to deliver antibiotics to the fusion bed, and relative ease of harvest—make this technique superior to free bone transfer in the achievement of augmented spinal fusion. OBJECTIVE To present a brief summary of similar existing concepts before describing the novel technique of this vascularized posterior iliac crest bone graft. METHODS Vascularized posterior iliac crest bone graft can be harvested from the same midline lumbar incision used for thoracolumbar spinal fusion, through lateral dissection around the paraspinals to the iliac crest. Recipient sites in the posterolateral bony spinal gutters may be as rostral as T12 and caudal as the sacrum. The ability to cover multiple lumbar levels can be achieved with desired lengths of the donor iliac crest. RESULTS Over 14 vascularized iliac crest bone grafts have been performed to augment lumbar fusion for salvage after pseudoarthrosis. Operative time and bleeding are reduced compared to free flap procedures, and no patients have experienced any complications related to these grafts. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography has been utilized in a novel way to ensure the vascularity of the bone graft prior to arthrodesis. CONCLUSION While long-term follow-up will be required to fully characterize fusion rates and patient morbidity, this innovative surgical option augments spinal fusion in patients with, or at increased risk for, pseudoarthrosis.


1998 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 273-281
Author(s):  
Anneliese D. Heiner ◽  
Yongde Zhang ◽  
Douglas R. Pedersen ◽  
Thomas D. Brown

Segments of fibula commonly used as cortical bone grafts need to support functional loading at their host site. Since many such constructs require the fibula to carry appreciable bending loads, we undertook a series of flexural tests to determine how flexural rigidity of the fibula varies with longitudinal (or harvest) site and loading direction. Ten fresh-frozen human fibulas were tested in a 4-point bending fixture. The fibulas were tested at three longitudinal sites (centered at 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 lengths) and in each of four anatomic directions (anterior, posterior, medial and lateral). There were consistent longitudinal and directional variations in flexural rigidity. The central site was about twice as stiff as the proximal and distal sites, for both the A-P and M-L directions (p < 0.05), indicating that the center of the fibula is the optimal site for harvesting grafts that will be subjected to severe bending. The A-P direction was stiffer in bending than the M-L direction, by 43%, 52%, and 86% for the proximal, central, and distal sites (p < 0.05 for the central and distal sites only), indicating that the choice of circumferential orientation of a fibular graft at the host site could have an appreciable influence on construct rigidity.


1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Sawin ◽  
Vincent C. Traynelis ◽  
Arnold H. Menezes

Object. Autogeneic bone graft is often incorporated into posterior cervical stabilization constructs as a fusion substrate. Iliac crest is used frequently, although donor-site morbidity can be substantial. Rib is used rarely, despite its accessibility, expandability, unique curvature, and high bone morphogenetic protein content. The authors present a comparative analysis of autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts, with emphasis on fusion rate and donor-site morbidity. Methods. A review was conducted of records and radiographs from 600 patients who underwent cervical spinal fusion procedures in which autogeneic bone grafts were used. Three hundred patients underwent rib harvest and posterior cervical fusion. The remaining 300 patients underwent iliac crest harvest (248 for an anterior cervical fusion and 52 for posterior fusion). The analysis of fusion focused on the latter subgroup; donor-site morbidity was determined by evaluating the entire group. Fusion criteria included bony trabeculae traversing the donor—recipient interface and long-term stability on flexion—extension radiographs. Graft morbidity was defined as any untoward event attributable to the graft harvest. Statistical comparisons were facilitated by using Fisher's exact test. Conclusions. Demographic data obtained in both groups were comparable. Rib constructs were placed in the following regions: occipitocervical (196 patients), atlantoaxial (35 patients), and subaxial cervical spine (69 patients). Iliac crest grafts were placed in the occipitocervical (28 patients), atlantoaxial (10 patients), and subaxial cervical (14 patients) regions. Fusion occurred in 296 (98.8%) of 300 rib graft and 49 (94.2%) of 52 iliac crest graft constructs (p = 0.056). Graft morbidity was greater with iliac crest than with rib (p < 0.00001). Donor-site morbidity for the rib graft was 3.7% and included pneumonia (eight patients), persistent atelectasis (two patients), and superficial wound dehiscence (one patient). Pneumothorax, intercostal neuralgia, and chronic chest wall pain were not encountered. Iliac crest morbidity occurred in 25.3% of the patients and consisted of chronic donor-site pain (52 patients), wound dehiscence (eight patients), pneumonia (seven patients), meralgia paresthetica (four patients), hematoma requiring evacuation (three patients), and iliac spine fracture (two patients). Even when chronic pain was not considered, morbidity encountered in obtaining iliac crest still exceeded that encountered with rib harvest (p = 0.035). The fusion rate and donor-site morbidity for rib autograft compare favorably with those for iliac crest when used in posterior cervical constructs. To the authors' knowledge, this represents the largest series to date in which the safety and efficacy of using autogeneic bone graft materials in spinal surgery are critically analyzed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document