Comparison of Effects of Nonoperative Treatment and Decompression Surgery on Risk of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Falling

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (13) ◽  
pp. e110-1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung Ho Lee ◽  
Tae-Hwan Kim ◽  
Moon-Soo Park ◽  
Suhan Lim ◽  
Jin-Oh Park ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Li ◽  
Yufu Ou ◽  
Furong Xie ◽  
Weiguo Liang ◽  
Gang Tian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is increasingly being used to treat lumbar degenerative disease, the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves considerable uncertainty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PELD for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients aged 65 years or older. Methods In this retrospective review, 136 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent PELD to treat LSS were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups, group A (ages 65–74) and group B (age ≥ 75), and perioperative data were analyzed. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and MacNab classification were used to evaluate postoperative clinical efficacy. Results All patients successfully underwent the operation with satisfactory treatment outcomes. Compared to preoperative scores, the self-reported scores or pain while performing daily activities were significantly improved in both treatment groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest, and postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). The overall postoperative complication rate was similar between the two groups. Moreover, no statistically significant differences in VAS-back pain scores, VAS-leg pain scores, JOA scores, and MacNab classification were found between the groups at the 3-month and 1.5-year follow-up examinations (P > 0.05). Conclusion PELD is safe and effective for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients. Age is not a contraindication for decompressive lumbar spine surgery. PELD has advantages such as reduced trauma, fewer anesthesia-related complications, and a fast postoperative recovery. Elderly patients should be considered good candidates for lumbar decompression surgery using minimally invasive techniques.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 112-115
Author(s):  
Yoji Ogura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Takahashi ◽  
Takahiro Kitagawa ◽  
Yoshiro Yonezawa ◽  
Kodai Yoshida ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 2573-2580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Barz ◽  
Markus Melloh ◽  
Lukas P. Staub ◽  
Sarah J. Lord ◽  
Harry R. Merk ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Yoshida ◽  
Junichi Ohya ◽  
Taiki Yasukawa ◽  
Yuki Onishi ◽  
Junichi Kunogi ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S23-S31
Author(s):  
Sudhir Diwan ◽  
Dawood Sayed ◽  
Timothy R Deer ◽  
Amber Salomons ◽  
Kevin Liang

Abstract Objective Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can lead to compression of the neural and vascular elements and is becoming more common due to degenerative changes that occur because of aging processes. Symptoms may manifest as pain and discomfort that radiates to the lower leg, thigh, and/or buttocks. The traditional treatment algorithm for LSS consists of conservative management (physical therapy, medication, education, exercise), often followed by epidural steroid injections (ESIs), and when nonsurgical treatment has failed, open decompression surgery with or without fusion is considered. In this review, the variables that should be considered during the management of patients with LSS are discussed, and the role of each treatment option to provide optimal care is evaluated. Results This review leads to the creation of an evidence-based practical algorithm to aid clinicians in the management of patients with LSS. Special emphasis is directed at minimally invasive surgery, which should be taken into consideration when conservative management and ESI have failed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru Kuwahara ◽  
Masataka Deie ◽  
Naoto Fujita ◽  
Nobuhiro Tanaka ◽  
Kazuyoshi Nakanishi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2195-2204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Loske ◽  
Corina Nüesch ◽  
Kimberly Sara Byrnes ◽  
Oliver Fiebig ◽  
Stefan Schären ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document