scholarly journals Effect of Femoral Head Size on Metal-on-HXLPE Hip Arthroplasty Outcome in a Combined Analysis of Six National and Regional Registries

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Allepuz ◽  
Leif Havelin ◽  
Thomas Barber ◽  
Art Sedrakyan ◽  
Stephen Graves ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 333 ◽  
pp. 226???233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urban Hedlundh ◽  
Lennart Ahnfelt ◽  
Carl-Henrik Hybbinette ◽  
Lars Wallinder ◽  
Johan Weckstr??m ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wierd P Zijlstra ◽  
Bas De Hartog ◽  
Liza N Van Steenbergen ◽  
B Willem Scheurs ◽  
Rob G H H Nelissen

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inari Kostensalo ◽  
Mika Junnila ◽  
Petri Virolainen ◽  
Ville Remes ◽  
Markus Matilainen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 197-202
Author(s):  
Daniel Pfeufer ◽  
Jeremy Gililland ◽  
Rane Ajinkya ◽  
Ian Duensing ◽  
Mike B. Anderson ◽  
...  

AbstractThere is very little literature on whether a simple radiographic measurement of native femoral head size correlates with implanted acetabular cup size. We hypothesized that there would be a high correlation between the radiographically measured native femoral head and implanted acetabular component size in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a retrospective study of 277 consecutive patients who underwent primary THA. Patients with prior contralateral THA or a history of congenital deformity were excluded (n = 95). We used the postoperative anteroposterior (AP) pelvic view to calibrate the image using known implanted femoral head component size. We then measured the diameter of the contralateral native femoral head under the assumption that femoral heads are generally symmetrical in patients. Two of the authors performed all measurements. To determine if native femoral head size was correlated with acetabular component size we used the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). There was a high correlation between contralateral native femoral head size and acetabular component size (r = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82–0.89). The median difference in radiographically measured native femoral head size and acetabular component size was 7 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 5–8). Our data showed a high correlation between acetabular component size and radiographically measured contralateral native femoral head size, with the difference being 7 mm. In addition to verifying the actual femoral head size with calipers during surgery, this simple radiographic measurement, which could be done on the affected or contralateral hip, may help surgeons to plan better and improve preoperative templating in primary THA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1771-1783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose‐Francisco Del‐Valle‐Mojica ◽  
Teresa Alonso‐Rasgado ◽  
David Jimenez‐Cruz ◽  
Colin G Bailey ◽  
Tim N Board

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin McHugh ◽  
Rajiv Merchant ◽  
Gabrielle E. Kelly ◽  
Karen M. Bergin ◽  
Gerald F. McCoy ◽  
...  

Background The sensitivity of cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion-levels in detecting poorly performing metal-on-metal hip implants is low. This study proposes that serial changes in ion-levels are a more accurate marker of arthroplasties at risk. Methods Serial metal ion-levels and implant data of 285 patients with ASR resurfacing or replacement were studied. Patient and implant characteristics were analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results 111 (39%) had revision surgery. Time since index surgery (p≤0.001), acetabular inclination (p≤0.001), their interaction (p≤0.001) and femoral head size (p = 0.01) were significant variables. Head size (≤51 mm) had lower Co and Cr levels (p = 0.01). Cr/Co showed marginal decrease over time in the unrevised group and no decrease prerevision. Conclusions Repeated measurement of ion-levels were higher in the revision group suggesting that serial measurements rather than absolute values may have a role to play in predicting implant failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document