scholarly journals Surgical Technique for Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Ankles with Preoperative Coronal Plane Varus Deformity of 10° or Greater

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy R. Daniels
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Mechanical and Anatomical Axis in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0008
Author(s):  
Ali-Asgar Najefi ◽  
Andrew Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Normal Group ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anatomical Axis

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Inadequate correction of alignment in the coronal, sagittal or axial planes will inevitably lead to failure of the Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA). The mechanical axis of the lower limb (MAL), the mechanical axis of the tibia (MAT) and the anatomical axis of the tibia (AAT) are three recognized coronal plane measurements using plain radiography. The relationship between anatomical and mechanical axes depends on the presence of femoral or tibial deformities from trauma or inherited conditions, or previous corrective or replacement surgery. Ankle arthroplasty relies heavily on preoperative radiographs or CT scans and the purpose of this study was to assess whether MAL, MAT and AAT are the same in a cohort of patients upon which placement of TAA is considered. Methods: We analysed 75 patients operated on between 2015 and 2016 at a specialist tertiary centre for elective orthopaedic surgery. All patients had a pre-operative long leg radiograph. They were split into 2 groups. The first group had known deformity proximal to the ankle (such as previous tibial or femoral fracture, severe arthritis, or previous reconstructive surgery) and the second group had no clinically detectable deformity. The MAL, MAT and AAT were assessed and the difference between these values was calculated. Results: There were 54 patients in the normal group, and 21 patients in the deformity group. Overall, 25 patients(33%) had a difference between all three axes of less than 1 degree. In 33 patients(44%), there was a difference in one of the axes of ≥2 degrees. There was no significant difference between MAT and AAT in patients in the normal group(p=0.6). 95% of patients had a difference of <1 degree. There was a significant difference between the MAT and AAT in patients in the deformity group(p<0.01). In the normal group, 39 patients(73%) had a difference of <2 degrees between the AAT and MAL. In the deformity group, only 10 patients (48%) had a difference of <2 degrees.In fact, 24% of patients had a difference ≥3 degrees. Conclusion: Malalignment in the coronal plane in TAA may be an issue that we have not properly addressed. Up to 66% of patients without known deformity may have a TAA that is placed at least 1 degree incorrectly relative to the MAL. We recommend the use of full-length lower limb radiographs when planning a TAA in order to plan the placement of implants. The decision to perform extramedullary referencing, intramedullary referencing, or patient specific Instrumentation must be part of the pre-operative planning process.

scholarly journals Minimum 5 Year Follow-Up Evaluation of a Third Generation Fixed Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty with an Intramedullary Tibial Component and a Central Suclus Talus

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0027
Author(s):  
Evan M. Loewy ◽  
Robert B. Anderson ◽  
Bruce E. Cohen ◽  
Carroll P. Jones ◽  
W. Hodges Davis
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Component ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been shown to be a viable option in the treatment of end stage ankle arthritis (ESAA). Early reports demonstrated good results with intramedullary fixation implants. Third generation implants of this kind added a central sulcus to the talar component. This is a report of clinical follow up data from a prospectively collected database at a single US institution using a third generation fixed bearing total ankle arthroplasty implant with a stemmed tibial component and a talar component with a central sulcus. To our knowledge, this is the first report of 5 year follow up data for this implant. Methods: Patients undergoing primary TAA at a single institution by one of four fellowship trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons with a third generation fixed bearing implant consisting of an intramedullary stemmed tibial component and a sulcus talus that were at least 5 years postoperative were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. These patients were followed at regular intervals with history, physical examination and radiographs; multiple patient reported outcomes (PRO) measures were obtained. Primary outcomes included implant survivability and PRO scores. Secondary outcomes included coronal plane radiographic alignment (Medial distal tibial articular angle (MDTA) and talar tilt angle (TTA)), evaluation for osteolysis, and failure mode when applicable. All reoperation events were recorded using the Canadian Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Reoperations Coding System (CROCS). Results: 121 TAA with this implant were performed in 119 patients between 2010 and 2013; 64 met inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 61.3 ± 10.0 years (range 38.7-84.3). The mean duration of follow up for living patients that retained both initial components at final follow-up was 6.1 ± 0.9 years (range 4.7 – 8.1 years). 26.6% of ankles had a preoperative MDTA and/or TTA greater than 10 degrees. There were 6 (9.4%) failures that occurred at a mean 2.0 ± 1.4 years postoperative. Two failures were due to deep infection. Only one failure was related to tibial component subsidence. One patient is currently scheduled for revision due to talar component subsidence. Conclusion: This cohort of TAA patients with minimum 5 year follow up using a third generation fixed bearing implant demonstrates acceptable implant survival, improved patient reported outcomes scores and maintenance of coronal plane alignment. These data also suggest tolerance of a larger preoperative deformity with improved implant design. To our knowledge, this is the first report with 5 year data on this implant. Continued follow up and reporting is needed to ensure that these favorable outcomes are maintained. Additionally, further investigation on acceptable coronal plane alignment correction with TAA is needed to determine the possible limitations of this procedure.

Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique

2019 ◽  
pp. 151-161
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Moracia-Ochagavía ◽  
Fernando Noriega-Díaz ◽  
E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty

Outcomes of Ankle Arthroplasty with Preoperative Coronal-Plane Varus Deformity of 10º or Greater

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (15) ◽  
pp. 1382-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomce Trajkovski ◽  
Ellie Pinsker ◽  
Anthony Cadden ◽  
Timothy Daniels
Keyword(s):  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty

scholarly journals PROMS and Radiological Outcomes in Mobile Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty for Patients with Varus or Valgus Deformity

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0001
Author(s):  
Jack Allport ◽  
Adam Bennett ◽  
Jayasree Ramaskandhan ◽  
Malik Siddique
Keyword(s):  
Physical Health ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Ap Weight ◽  
Radiological Analysis

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: There is increasing evidence that outcomes for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are not adversely affected by pre-operative varus deformity. There is a sparsity of evidence relating to outcomes in valgus ankle arthritis. We present our outcomes using a mobile bearing prosthesis (Mobility TAA system, DePuy, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA) with a comparison of neutral, varus and valgus ankles. Methods: This is a single surgeon, retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases. Cases were identified from a locally held joint registry which routinely records PROMS data pre-operatively and at annual intervals. Patients undergoing primary TAA between March 2006 and June 2014 were included. Rrevision procedures along with those with inadequate radiographic images for deformity analysis were excluded. Patients with inadequate PROMS data were included in the radiological analysis but not the PROMS analysis. Data collected included FAOS (Womac Pain, Function and Stiffness), SF-36 scores and patient satisfaction. Radiological data was gathered from routinely taken AP weight bearing radiographs pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively and at final follow up. Pre-operative deformity was measured between the tibial anatomical axis and a line perpendicular to the talus. Patients were classified as neutral, varus (≥10 degrees varus) or valgus (≥10 degrees valgus). Results: 230 cases (see image) underwent radiological classification (152 neutral, 60 varus, 18 valgus) and were included in the radiological analysis (mean follow-up 55.9 months). 164 cases were included in the PROMS analysis (mean follow-up 61.6 months). The groups were similar with regards to BMI and length of follow-up but neutral ankles were younger (P<0.001). Baseline scores were equal except physical health with valgus ankles scoring lowest (P=0.045). Valgus ankles had statistically better post-operative pain (P=0.0247) and function (P=0.012) than neutral ankles. Pre to post-operative change did not reach statistical significance except physical health where valgus outperformed neutral and varus (p=0.039). Mean post-operative angle was 3.1 and final angle 3.7 with no significant differences. There was no significant differences in revision rates. Conclusion: Our study confirms previous evidence that varus deformity does not affect outcome in TAA. Contrary to this, valgus ankles in our cohort performed better post-operatively than neutral ankles. Post-operative coronal radiological alignment was not affected by pre-operative deformity and was maintained over a number of years. Coronal plane deformity does not negatively impact either radiological or clinical outcomes in TAA should not be considered an absolute contra-indication.

scholarly journals Mid-Term (4-10 year) Outcomes of INBONE I Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Deformity Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Andrew Harston ◽  
James Nunley ◽  
Mark Easley ◽  
James DeOrio ◽  
Samuel Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Plane Deformity

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Concerns for limited coronal plane stability prompted the manufacturer and designers of the INBONE total ankle arthroplasty system to replace the original saddle-shaped talar component (INBONE I) with a sulcus-shaped talar component (INBONE II). Prior to the availability of the INBONE II talar component, numerous INBONE I total ankle replacements were performed. To our knowledge mid-term outcomes of INBONE I total ankle arthroplasty have not been reported. This study compares the mid-term outcomes of patients with and without preoperative coronal plane deformity who underwent total ankle replacement with the INBONE I prosthesis. In our opinion, the longer-term outcomes of the INBONE I prosthesis are important for patient and surgeon education. Methods: A consecutive series of patients, from May, 2007 to September, 2011, at a single institution who underwent total ankle arthroplasty with the INBONE I Total Ankle Arthroplasty (Wright Medical) were prospectively enrolled. Pain and patient- reported function were assessed preoperatively and at yearly follow-ups with use of a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle- hindfoot score, the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. We analyzed the data for complications, reoperations, and failures (defined as undergoing revision for exchange or removal of the metallic components for any reason). Patients were grouped according to coronal plane tibiotalar alignment (preoperative coronal plane malalignment of >10 degrees and <10 degrees deformity) and outcomes compared. Results: One-hundred fifty-five INBONE I prostheses were implanted in 151 patients, with minimum 4 year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Follow-up ranged from 48-113 months with an average of 67 months. There was significant (p<0.05) improvement in the VAS, AOFAS, SMFA, and SF-36 scores at most recent follow-up. Forty-five patients (29%) had 49 additional surgeries for impingement, loosening/subsidence, malalignment, ligament instability, polyethylene exchange, and/or infection. There were 14 implant failures with overall survivorship of 90.3%. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between patients with coronal plane deformity >10 degrees (47.7%) and <10 degrees (52.3%). Patients with >10 degrees had fewer reoperations (19 vs. 30) and fewer revisions (5 vs. 9) when compared to patients with <10 degrees deformity. Conclusion: Patients who underwent INBONE I total ankle arthroplasty demonstrated significant improvement in pain and patient-reported outcomes at a mean of 5.7 years post-operatively. The patients with preoperative coronal plane tibiotalar deformity had similar pain relief, function, and need for additional surgeries and revisions. Despite the presumed shortcomings of the INBONE I’s saddle-shaped talar design, this operation shows promising results, with or without deformity, at mid-term follow- up with survivorship of 90.3%.

Hindfoot Alignment Change After Total Ankle Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072097093
Author(s):  
Hyuck Sung Son ◽  
Jung Gyu Choi ◽  
Jungtae Ahn ◽  
Bi O Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Hindfoot Alignment ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Surface Angle

Background: In patients with end-stage varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA), hindfoot varus malalignment resulting from the varus deformity of the ankle joint is common. Although total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) performed to correct varus deformity of the ankle joint has the effect of correcting hindfoot alignment, no reports to date have described how much hindfoot alignment correction can be achieved. The purpose of this study was to identify correlation between ankle deformity correction and hindfoot alignment change after performing TAA in patients with end-stage varus ankle OA. Methods: A total of 61 cases that underwent TAA for end-stage varus ankle OA and followed up for at least 1 year were enrolled for this study. Correlation between changes of tibial-ankle surface angle (TAS), talar tilt (TT), and tibiotalar surface angle (TTS) and changes of hindfoot alignment angle (HA), hindfoot alignment ratio (HR), and hindfoot alignment distance (HD) measured preoperatively and at postoperative year 1 was analyzed. Results: TAS, TT, and TTS changed from 83.9 ± 4.1 degrees, 5.8 ± 5.0 degrees, and 78.1 ± 5.9 degrees, respectively, before operation to 89.2 ± 2.1 degrees, 0.4 ± 0.5 degrees, and 88.7 ± 2.3 degrees, respectively, after operation. HA, HR, and HD also changed from −9.2 ± 4.6 degrees, 0.66 ± 0.18, and −11.2 ± 6.9 mm to −3.7 ± 4.1 degrees, 0.48 ± 0.14, and −5.0 ± 5.3 mm. All the changes were statistically significant ( P < .001, respectively). The regression slope of correlation was 0.390 ( R2 = 0.654) between TTS and HA; 0.017 ( R2 = 0.617) between TTS and HR; and 0.560 ( R2 = 0.703) between TTS and HD. Conclusion: In patients with end-stage varus ankle OA, changes of hindfoot alignment could be predicted based on degree of ankle deformity corrected with TAA. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Comparison of Preoperative Bone Density in Patients With and Without Periprosthetic Osteolysis Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072097609
Author(s):  
Gun-Woo Lee ◽  
Hyoung-Yeon Seo ◽  
Dong-Min Jung ◽  
Keun-Bae Lee
Keyword(s):  
Bone Density ◽  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Bone Ingrowth ◽  
Distal Tibia ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Coronal Plane ◽  
Periprosthetic Osteolysis ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Press Fit

Background: Modern total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) prostheses are uncemented press-fit designs whose stability is dependent on bone ingrowth. Preoperative insufficient bone density reduces initial local stability at the bone-implant interface, and we hypothesized that this may play a role in periprosthetic osteolysis. We aimed to investigate the preoperative bone density of the distal tibia and talus and compare these in patients with and without osteolysis. Methods: We enrolled 209 patients (218 ankles) who underwent primary TAA using the HINTEGRA prosthesis. The overall mean follow-up duration was 66 (range, 24-161) months. The patients were allocated into 2 groups according to the presence of periprosthetic osteolysis: the osteolysis group (64 patients, 65 ankles) and nonosteolysis group (145 patients, 153 ankles). Between the 2 groups, we investigated and compared the radiographic outcomes, including the Hounsfield unit (HU) value around the ankle joint and the coronal plane alignment. Results: HU values of the tibia and talus measured at 5 mm from the reference points were higher than those at 10 mm in each group. However, comparing the osteolysis and nonosteolysis groups, we found no significant intergroup difference in HU value at every measured level in the tibia and talus ( P > .05). Concerning the coronal plane alignment, there were no significant between-group differences in the tibiotalar and talar tilt angles ( P > .05). Conclusions: Patients with osteolysis showed similar preoperative bone density of the distal tibia and talus compared with patients without osteolysis. Our results suggest that low bone density around the ankle joint may not be associated with increased development of osteolysis. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document