THE IMPACTS OF THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OFFICES ON THE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS’ INNOVATION AND PATENTS APPLICATION ABILITY: CASE OF TURKEY FROM 2010 TO 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gamze Sart
1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-147
Author(s):  
George F. Reynolds

Conference on How to Internationalize Technology Transfer, Seventh International Annual Conference of the International Association of Consultants in Higher Education Institutions, Twente, The Netherlands, 1–3 July 1987.


Author(s):  
Meenakshi Kanojia ◽  
Balvinder Shukla ◽  
Anil Wali ◽  
Manoj Joshi

This study aims to identify and empirically evaluates the critical factors of successful technology transfer (TT) from higher education institutions (HEI) to industry and to develop a TT model in the Indian context. With the help of questionnaire survey, the perception profile of 318 respondents was collected from PAN-India. Utilizing the survey data, factor analysis identified six constructs representing five critical factors of TT and an outcome factor. The results of multiple regression analysis indicate significant effect of all five critical factors on an outcome factor. The findings of the study validate the TT Model and identify supportive and promotive TT environment factor, market and finance factor and HEI factor to be the most important factors of successful TT. This study may help the policymakers in strategizing future initiatives to improve the rate of successful TT.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1063-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena STANKEVIČIENĖ ◽  
Lidija KRAUJALIENĖ ◽  
Agnė VAICIUKEVIČIŪTĖ

Innovative activities, knowledge exchange, patenting and commercialization of know-how are crucial to the value creation process in higher education institutions and other research organizations. The article analyses the technology transfer performance indicators of value creation. The methodology to identify and assess the technology transfer activities with the highest impact on created value are proposed in the paper. The following research methods were invoked: FARE method, allowed to calculate weights of each technology transfer performance indicator, when TOPSIS method redress all different indicators’ results and rank universities. The application of the proposed methodology was based on empirical data collected from Lithuanian universities. The results of the study reveal the importance of science business partnerships, TTO competence and scientists’ trust of TTO, applying particular technology transfer policy. The obtained results would be beneficial for universities technology transfer policy formation to maximize universities created value.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 607-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Heinzl ◽  
Ah-Lian Kor ◽  
Graham Orange ◽  
Hans Rüdiger Kaufmann

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (32) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Francisco Agramon Mata ◽  
Jorge Isaac Lechuga Cardozo

El objetivo de este artículo es mostrar evidencia sobre las disposiciones en relación a la transferencia de tecnología entre las principales universidades públicas de producción científica de México; la Universidad Autónoma de México (UNAM), el Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP) y la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL). Se definió un estudio de investigación documental de tipo analítico. Se realizaron entrevistas con especialistas de transferencia de tecnología y propiedad industrial; así como con inventores y se revisó la información de los reglamentos internos de Las Universidades objeto de estudio. Las disposiciones reglamentarias en relación a la transferencia de tecnología de las Instituciones de Educación Superior (IES) en México son muy confidenciales y difíciles de encontrar libremente por cualquier usuario. Se concluye que de las Universidades objeto de estudio, la UANL y la UNAM proporcionan las mejores condiciones de incentivos hacia los investigadores para la producción de propiedad industrial y su respectiva comercialización. En la repartición de regalías la UAM provee el porcentaje más alto a los investigadores (50%). En relación a la oferta tecnológica, la BUAP presenta la plataforma con información más completa y atractiva para la visibilidad por parte de los usuarios.Palabras clave: Transferencia de tecnología, innovación tecnológica, propiedad Industrial.


Management ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-84
Author(s):  
Iryna Goncharenko

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. The strategy of innovation development in Ukraine envisages the creation of innovative ecosystem of higher education institutions. Analysis of the current state of interaction between science, business and the state in Ukraine shows that most of the technologies and developments created as a result of scientific and technical activities of higher education institutions have not yet been implemented in the real economy. Communication interaction between representatives of higher school and enterprises involves the initiation of the innovation ecosystem. Practical implementation of conceptual model of Hackathon-ecosystem of technology transfer in higher education institution will allow to move to a new level of innovative development of higher education institution.METHODS. The study used: the DFD method for constructing a context diagram and diagram 1 level of functioning of the Hackathon ecosystem of technology transfer in higher education institution; information and technological approaches to the project management of HETT creation in the university to ensure effective management of project data flow; qualitative and operational communication between the project stakeholders.FINDINGS. The developed conceptual model of Hackathon-ecosystem of technology transfer in higher education institutions allows to take into account the specifics of functioning of higher education. The proposed block diagram of the initialization project of the creation of the Hackathon-ecosystem of technology transfer consists of 7 stages, which allows to take into account the specifics of the university. The optimal composition of stakeholders of the Hackathon-ecosystem of technology transfer in higher education institutions is defined: initiator, manager, team, customer, curator, owner, competitors, sponsor, authorities, community groups, consumers, organizations, suppliers and contractors.CONCLUSION. Practical implementation of the developed conceptual model of Hackathon-ecosystem of technology transfer in higher education institutions allows to generate ideas in accordance with market requirements and implement the most effective; to determine the needs and interests in establishing cooperation between representatives of higher education and business; to determine the compliance of the prototypes created with the needs of stakeholders and will provide feedback regarding the functioning of Hackathon-ecosystem of technology transfer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document