Impact of near Well-Bore Geology on Hydraulic Fractures Geometry and Well Productivity: A Statistical Look Back at the Utica Play

Author(s):  
Emeric Gourjon ◽  
Antoine Bertoncello
SPE Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (05) ◽  
pp. 1539-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadav Sorek ◽  
Jose A. Moreno ◽  
Ryan N. Rice ◽  
Guofan Luo ◽  
Christine Ehlig-Economides

Summary Hydraulic fractures propagate perpendicular to the horizontal-well axis whenever the drilling direction is parallel to the minimum-principal-stress direction. However, operators frequently drill horizontal wells parallel to lease boundaries, resulting in hydraulic-fracture vertical planes slanted at angles less than 90° from the well axis. The stimulated-rock-volume (SRV) dimensions are defined by fracture height, well length, and fracture length multiplied by the sine of the angle between fracture planes and the horizontal-well axis (fracture angle). The well productivity index (PI) under boundary-dominated flow (BDF) is given by the PI for one fully penetrating fracture multiplied by the number of fractures. An extension of the unified-fracture-design (UFD) approach for rectangular drainage areas enables determination of the unique number of fractures that will maximize well productivity under BDF conditions given the formation permeability, proppant mass, fracture angle, and well spacing. Fracture length and width vary depending on the fracture angle, but the total-propped-fracture volume remains constant. Because the likely reason for drilling at an angle to the minimum-stress direction is to better cover a lease area with north/south and east/west boundaries, the smallest fracture angle will be 45°, corresponding to northwest/southeast or northeast/southwest minimum-stress direction. This results in the need to lengthen fractures by at most 40% to preserve the SRV for a given horizontal-well length and spacing. For the same sufficiently large proppant mass, this will reduce fracture conductivity by the same factor. However, because the flow area has increased, the result will be greater well productivity. This study shows a simple strategy for designing wells to maximize productivity even when not drilled in the minimum-stress direction.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Fokker ◽  
Francesca Verga ◽  
Paul Egberts

Summary Simplified analytical relations derived for homogeneous formations are usually applied to the determination of the productivity of horizontal wells, regardless of the presence of heterogeneities in the reservoir. Furthermore, complex well architectures and the wealth of completion options currently available cannot be taken into account properly because the well trajectory can only be schematized as a single horizontal wellbore. However, the use of numerical reservoir simulators to reliably forecast the productivity of horizontal wells draining heterogeneous reservoirs may be time-prohibitive or not feasible because of a lack of sufficiently detailed information, especially during the appraisal phase or the early stages of production. A new semianalytic technique is proposed in this paper to solve the inflow equations in an approximate yet reliable manner. A solution to 3D problems of single-phase flow into a horizontal well, taking into account friction in the wellbore, is provided for both single-layer reservoirs and reservoirs comprising two interfering layers. The method also has been extended to describe the fluid flow when the well intercepts one or more fractures. The presented technique allows very fast calculation of the well productivity in oil and gas reservoirs, offering great flexibility in the placement and architecture of the wells. The method has been applied to two field cases for which the well productivity under pseudosteady-state conditions was measured. One of these is a 200-m-long horizontal well draining an isotropic carbonatic reservoir and intersected by a natural low-conductivity fracture. The other is a similar well, intercepting a natural high-conductivity fault, but the oil-bearing formation is anisotropic. Good correspondence was found between the actual productivity and the predictions obtained by application of the proposed semianalytic technique. Introduction Horizontal wells are common practice in the present hydrocarbon industry, and smart wells (including multilateral completions and wells with selective access of different zones) are becoming increasingly commonplace. The modeling of such wells is, in many cases, not ideal. Areas in which improvements are welcome are well testing, well models in reservoir simulators, and fast models for quick assessment of many field-development options. Further, the handling of natural or hydraulic fractures is often suboptimal. In reservoir simulation, fine grids need to be selected to properly capture the flow behavior close to the well. Moreover, most reservoir simulators are not equipped with extensive well models, which are required when friction in the well becomes important or when two-phase flow develops in the well. This situation has prompted the development of a number of analytical and semianalytical tools, some of which are intended for implementation in a reservoir simulator. Most of the first models, as well as many of the more recent models, assume either constant influx density along the well or infinite well conductivity in a single homogeneous layer. Dikken introduced the effect of well conductivity for a single horizontal well in a homogeneous formation. He started with the assumption that the flow is mainly perpendicular to the wellbore, which allowed him to reduce the reservoir to a 2D flow domain, coupled to a friction model in the well. Others followed this approach, but 3Dmodels were developed as well. A second kind of extension are the multilayer models. Lee and Milliken and Kuchuk and Habashy used a method of reflection and transmission, while Basquet et al. used a "quadrupole" method relating the pressures between the various layers. The multilayer models are also, however, still limited to constant-influx or infinite-conductivity wells.


2012 ◽  
Vol 616-618 ◽  
pp. 737-743
Author(s):  
Fan Hui Zeng ◽  
Jian Chun Guo

Considering the reservoir seepage, borehole wall inflow, fracture and perforation flow’s process and mutual influence, an unsteady state computation model of fractured horizontal well coupling with reservoir was established based on the source function and superposition principle. Calculation results showed that compared to the production only from the hydraulic fractures, the difference of that both from fractures and perforations was great early and decreased slowly later. Take the perforation production for example, because of mutual interference and well bore flow friction, different location perforations with different output and the central-perforation production was lower than that of the outer-position.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabah Mesdour ◽  
Moemen Abdelrahman ◽  
Abdulbari Alhayaf

Abstract Horizontal drilling and multistage hydraulic fracturing applied in unconventional reservoirs over the past decade to create a large fracture surface area to improve the well productivity. The combination of reservoir quality with perforation cluster spacing and fracture staging are keys to successful hydraulic fracturing treatment for horizontal wells. The objective of this work is to build and calibrate a dynamic model by integrating geologic, hydraulic fracture, and reservoir modeling to optimize the number of clusters and other completion parameters for a horizontal well drilled in the source rock reservoir using simulation and analytical models. The methodology adopted in this study covers the integration of geological, petrophysical, and production data analysis to evaluate reservoir and completion qualities and quantify the heterogeneity and the perforation clusters number required within a frac stage. Assuming all perforation clusters are uniformly distributed within a stage. The hydraulic planer fracture attributes assumed and the surface production measurement together with the production profile were used to calibrate the reservoir model. The properties of the Stimulated Reservoir Volume "SRV" were defined after the final calibration using reservoir model including hydraulic fractures. The calibrated reservoir model was used to carry out sensitivity analyses for cluster spacing optimization and other completion parameters considering the surface and reservoir constraints. An optimum cluster spacing was observed based on the Estimated Ultimate Recovery "EUR" of the subject well by reservoir properties. The final results based on 70% of perforation clusters contribution to production observed from PLT log, and the results of this study were implemented. Afterwards, another study has been undertaken to increasing the stimulation effectiveness and maximizing the number of perforation clusters contributing to productivity as an area for improvement to engineering the completion design. The methodology adopted in this study identifies the most important parameters of completion affecting well productivity for specific unconventional reservoirs. This study will help to engineer completion design, improve cluster efficiency, reduce cost and increase well EUR for the development phase.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (50) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Franklin
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document